You won't believe what is being said on the BBC and such like.
Some general has been told to introduce the idea of conscription for real actual men to go and kill other semi-obliterated-already men, women and children in places like Palestine, Yemen and Iran. It's just sick and the men and women of Great Britain want you to know we are not behind any of this violence.
Put the drones down, turn the artificial intelligence off, and have a little think!
My Peace Declaration!
They want to take mothers and women from the Constitution.
Until now, the mother was the matriarch of the home and it clearly states in 41.2 that’ social order’ cannot be achieved without the mother.
If that’s the case, then why are they taking the mother out? They, in this instance, are the Irish government and there are multiple reasons they are promoting this amendment and none of those reasons are anything to do with respecting LGBTQ..
It is to appease the lgbtq community because the rights of gay men and other genders recognised now are not solidified within the constitution.
"The State recognises the family as the natural primary and fundamental unit group of society, and as a moral institution possessing inalienable, inprescriptable rights and antecedent and superior to all positive law."
In reality there are a lot of words in this article that have power. The woman is protected above acts, statutes, legislation - which
Positive law includes all mandates, acts, statutes and legislation. Because the woman’s rights are superior to all positive law that is the real reason they want to remove it.
Interestingly, the man is not mentioned in the Bunreact. What everyone needs to understand is that man and woman are words of natural law, more fundamental than positive law. in the Constitution the authority sequence is God, men and women then government as public servants. The government are trying to switch it and say there's God, government, then us. We the people are all on the same side and we need men and women and family with authorities and roles in the Constitution to maintain this lawful power structure.
41.11 The state guarantees to protect the Constitution and authority of the family as the necessary basis to social order.
In reality, the words here are 'guarantees', 'protect' and 'authority'.
Please think in terms of Social Protection, which is in this case a financial and housing obligation to facilitate the period of a woman’s life in the home, Currently, in the Constitution, the government accepts responsibility of that guarantee.
The changing of these words takes away the responsibility from the government. This is especially by replacing the word ‘guarantees ‘to ‘strive’. Striving has no consequences if they fail to achieve supporting the people and children.
If the government remove, from themselves, their guarantee and obligation to the woman in the home so that children can be raised (and we'll talk about the carers' bill in another post), all types of social welfare payments that go to single mothers, widows, wives of army men, children’s allowance, back-to-school payments will be gone. Women will be put on to jobseekers allowance, where all members of the family will be forced to find a job and your child will be indoctrinated into creches and new institutions, from infancy. rather than the bonding development period, one to one relationships that all pedagogies in the National Forum confirm are crucial to successful stable emotional, physical and mental development. The creches have already been advertised on E-Tenders which is a government public contract website where huge amounts of money exchange hands and all experienced people and organizations will not be considered as the government will not award contracts to anyone who has not managed an equal sized contract before, leaving mercenary incompetent companies in charge of infants between 6 months and 3 years.
Instead of taking away rights, they should be rushing to implement at last the 49 recommendations for improving women’s rights in eire that were agreed in the 1970s.
For example: The Anti-Discrimination (Pay) Act 1974, the Employment Equality Act 1977, the removal of the marriage bar in the Civil Service in 1973, and the Maternity Protection of Employees Act 1981 which introduced maternity leave are examples of related changes in Irish legislation.
The very opposite is being proposed here.
short interview with emer, on why to vote no at the referendum
“Unrecoverable Error”
Why are the International Atomic Energy Agency part of the Health Regulations? Article 6 (in one of the drafts treaties that are the moving target that member states are to decide on) dedicate an article to the IAEA.
In another article the WHO claims that nuclear submarines are central to their logistics supply chain. I suppose if they are dropping off the experimental gene therapies, no one is going to send them packing…however much damage they did the last time (17 million dead from Covid 19 vaccine injuries I gather. They stopped the roll out of the swine flu universal vaccine after 20 died but hey that was 10 years ago and life held value back then).
We need to explore the risk that Indonesia may lose control of their nuclear resources.
According to BRIN's Awaludin, Indonesia has uranium reserves of some 90,000 tonnes and thorium reserves of around 140,000 tonnes - enough to power 10 1,000MWe nuclear for 30 years. Both the Sustainability Goals and Health Treaties require that member states report their resources, which means that the WHO can take control of them on climate action or health emergency grounds, declared by themselves.
English Comedy:
Yes Prime Minister Discussing The Trident Submarine Purchase
It is hard to remember what the public used to to be told about nuclear power. We knew nuclear reactors were dangerous because the processes of fission and fusion require extreme compression and extreme heat; temperatures twice as hot as the core of the sun. Sometimes nuclear power stations would “melt-down”, releasing radioactive waste. We were told that nuclear waste never degrades. Hundreds of millions of cubic metres, of the toxic waste, sit in each country, including Indonesia, while ways to store it ‘for longer than expected’ (Brin) are explored. Sometimes nuclear waste was piped to other countries, or dumped little-by-little into the sea. More recently, the nuclear industry were in negotiations with gas and oil companies to bury the waste in empty wells. In the past, most men and women associated nuclear power with war and inevitable mass destruction, by accident or by design.
Then there was the danger of “a maniac” “pressing the button”, detonating a nuclear bomb. We hoped leaders would know of the “nuclear winter” that would follow, where nothing will grow and so much radiation in the air would make our hair fall out, and quickly humans, along with the other animal and plant life would wither and die.
People imagined that military personnel would wait nervously for the leader of their country to give the command to fire. We hoped the threat of nuclear war would only ever escalate following many months and years of peace negotiations, and efforts to find other resolutions. If we had thought about using nuclear weapons logically, we would have remembered that there is only ever a “4-minute warning”. Four minutes is not enough time to ring the President, or even discuss with a colleague, so whoever is on duty must rely on the notification from that computer system and follow protocol. Military protocol requires immediate retaliation.
This procedure, upon which the safety of the whole world rests, was eventually tested: A transmission came in, to an Early Warning data centre, that the US had launched six nuclear missiles on Russia. By great chance, a man by the name of Stanislav Petrov was on duty. Feeling the responsibility for the action he had to take, he recognised he still had a choice. “An erroneous retaliatory nuclear attack on the United States and its NATO allies could have wiped out half of the population”. But what else did he have, in addition to the computer reports and protocol? He had the depth of his experience; his reasoning; his observations of the political landscape; his care for life and trust in his own inner authority. Petrov made “a judgement call” and decided the reports must be a false alarm. “An investigation later confirmed that the satellite warning system had indeed malfunctioned”.
In the upcoming election debate, candidates should discuss their understanding and stance on commercial and military nuclear power and how they will lead with discernment and concern for the cost to life. The cost to life is not just if there’s a war or disaster. The replacement Trident nuclear submarine for the UK cost the same as providing an upgraded National Health Service for free, for the whole population, for 45 years. Somehow the decision to finance the submarine instead of the National Health Service, got passed in their parliament.
Thankfully, President Joko Widodo already sent a clear message to the world that “the possession and use of nuclear weapons cannot be justified for any reason”, when he ratified the Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) in November 2023. But was Indonesia informed by its “Plenipotentiary ambassadors” abroad (These are delegates to foreign countries who have independent, executive powers to act on behalf of Indonesia) about the AUKUS Partnership between the UK, US and Australia; to arm Australia with eight nuclear submarines? China have called the plan “a return to a Cold War mentality”. France are calling it a “stab in the back”, as a French company was going to manufacture the submarines and Australia had to pay France 555 million euro compensation, just to get out of the deal. With that level of international bad feeling about the Arkus partnership, only formed in 2021, ministerial candidates must ask whether the submarines could make Indonesia more of a military target, than act as a ‘deterrent’ - which is what some governments are calling nuclear weapons now - or serve on the Pandemic Preparedness fast-response supply chain to international health and security crises, where the UN say they would like to maximise the use of nuclear submarines.
Following recent agreements with the US and the upcoming WHO Pandemic Treaty, already signed, can Indonesia put the brakes on and say ‘No’ to nuclear weapons in Indonesian waters or the use of Indonesian resources to fuel and arm them? The submarines, like the other smart technologies are to use artificial intelligence extensively in their operation.
Gladiator Bangsa have also been considering, when did competent authorities, regulators and decision-makers start trusting technology and being digitally-assisted, more than trusting our own experience and knowledge and trusting each other?
Most people have sat in front of a computer screen for a lot longer than four minutes, in frustration and powerlessness, unable to even verify their own identity to access their own accounts. In the past, a computer screen would often read ‘Unrecoverable Error”. Imagine the artificial intelligence in these nuclear submarines, executing their programmed protocols without hesitation, while the Naval Commander frantically tries to get clearance to stop the ballistic missiles being fired. The computer may require a retina scan; facial recognition; a finger print, and may an OTP - a One Time Password. Picture all these being asked for at once in order to return the computer system to manual controls. Too late. “Unrecoverable error”.
The Equalizer by Urgent Rougherendum
References
AUSMIN meeting in July 2023, AUKUS members strengthened their military ties to counter superpower China.
Screenshot says: Arkus members must maintain warm ties with Indonesia regardless of who wins the Presidential election!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AUKUS - partnership between UK, US to help Australia get nuclear submarines.
I think the next meeting could discuss if this is treason, to commit Indonesia to a treaty that will mean it is forced to exploit its resources at its own expense to provide fuel and weapons for Australia's nuclear submarines - that sail 365 a year regardless of war or peace as its too dangerous to turn them on or off. They want Indonesia's resources and force their extraction on climate action grounds. (The UN sustainability goals deadline is November 2024 Roguski says) Hence all the military involvement are token characters (as Richard found), not the senior officials who actually care or understand biosafety and protecting Indonesia from misuse. Ref Military involvement with the WHO.
This is the plan that biden made with the president: The Semi-conductor eco system!
https://id.usembassy.gov/fact-sheet-president-joseph-r-biden-and-president-joko-widodo-announce-the-u-s-indonesia-comprehensive-strategic-partnership/
This is the mining that I believe Biden wants to help Indonesia with:
https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/deep_sea_mining_norway_lec/?blSGXab&v=152819&cl=20989821612&_checksum=b2c0223f58b57533a516514dcb08003401c1d68bca32c9a89839993977fb2ca8
This is the WHO's own review of the financing of the Treaty and UN Climate action being finalized at COP28 this week. All of which your planning minister would like to know about I'm sure!!
https://www.who.int/news/item/02-12-2023-41-funders--partners-endorse-new-guiding-principles-for-financing-climate-and-health-solutions-to-protect-health
I was looking at the United Nations who are based in New York and found this ambassador for Indonesia who is in charge of the seabed authority. I also shared the UN ambassador's list to ask Nicola if they were the same ambassadors as we appealed to, to encourage their countries to exit the WHO! I don't know yet.
Indonesia's ambassador is on the Rulers List !!!!
https://rulers.org/indexn1.html
List of current permanent representatives to the United Nations - Wikipedia
List of current permanent representatives to the United Nations - Wikipedia
This is a list of the current permanent representatives to the United Nations at United Nations Headquarters, Ne...
List of current permanent representatives to the United Nations - Wikipedia
This is a list of the current permanent representatives to the United Nations at United Nations Headquarters, Ne...
All the different UN bodies behind the initiatives
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/main-bodies
This may explain why biosurveillance, regulation and marine biotech are already in place for Indonesia.
Is the geothermal a resource they might be after, I asked google:
https://www.thinkgeoenergy.com/indonesia-behind-in-exploiting-its-geothermal-resources/
Oxitec/WHO WMP are connected:
13 years. in Oxford University and Vietnam on Mosquitoes - Wolbachia. Director of Global Implementation.
https://www.worldmosquitoprogram.org/en/work/about-us/team/cameron-simmons
Katie Anders epidemiologist and doctoral scholar at the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit in Vietnam - WMP Director Impact Assessment
https://www.worldmosquitoprogram.org/en/work/about-us/team/katie-anders
Scott O'Neill - genetic engineering work
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=DNv_re0AAAAJ&hl=en -
Sir Jeremy Farrar - head scientist at the WHO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Farrar
He was at Oxitec GM Mosquitoes / Wellcome Trust Annual Report
https://cms.wellcome.org/sites/default/files/2023-01/Wellcome-Trust-Annual-Report-and-Financial-Statements-2022.pdf
Attached screenshots: : Nasir (Plenipotentiary Indonesian UN Diplomat in charge of Seabed), UN and Microsoft accept legal costs for AI Privacy infringements (and the same AI is being used to map bombing sites for Israel to bomb Palestine too at the moment - which makes sense of the Indonesian hospital being bombed the day we interrupted their deployment in Bali.
Article showing how military have shown enthusiasm for policing health.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673618328381?fr=RR-2&ref=pdf_download&rr=83223e8ffee62db8
https://ccfe.ukaea.uk/uk-takes-major-step-towards-near-limitless-low-carbon-energy/ https://healingbyfranc.blogspot.com/2021/05/civil-nuclear-in-military-service.html https://healingbyfranc.blogspot.com/2015/10/they-are-trying-to-militarize-space.html
https://www.icanw.org/indonesia
https://ccfe.ukaea.uk/uk-takes-major-step-towards-near-limitless-low-carbon-energy/
https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/how-nuclear-weapons-work
https://www.iaea.org/bulletin/what-is-fusion-and-why-is-it-so-difficult-to-achieve
http://factorgmo.com/public-board/
Lots of love and hope life is good for you, well done on the lawsuit!
https://www.rfsafe.com/will-elon-musk-engulf-planet-with-cancer-causing-microwave-radiation/
Weapons of Mass Destruction
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senjata_pemusnah_massal
This is the abbreviation for Nusantara but it is a common abbreviation for 'I know not'
So the president was in America talking about I know not what!
But he has said that Indonesia will only pay for 20% of the new capital. Hes encouraging others to invest like Thailand but Microsoft is the biggest contibutor.
APEC builders for Nusantara
PUPR says ministerial and security forces houses are 42% finished
Gates 47 months fintech funding for jakarta is just finished
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2019/10/inv001331
The REDD Incentives for governments to not cut down forests. Could it be used. Has it been misused by new Magrove plantations for Biotech use?
Ministers of public works and marine
https://southeastasiaglobe.com/indonesias-new-capital-covid19/
BandungmSuicide bmber criticizing new criminal code
The President also thought the criminal code needed more 'Socialization'
https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/12/08/indonesia-new-criminal-code-disastrous-rights
Trade meeting
They plan to exploit Rattan and Mangrove roots - INBAR Transfer of Technology United nations Model for Kilmantan
Rattan
https://www.fao.org/3/y2783e/y2783e.pdf
https://www.fao.org/3/x5860e/x5860e04.htm
Monkeypox cae in Bandung in October - https://jabarprov.go.id/en/berita/kasus-cacar-monyet-muncul-di-kota-bandung-pemkot-imbau-masyarakat-perhatikan-ini-11179
Mangrove BIotech
https://annalsmicrobiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s13213-012-0442-7
modified method is efficient in obtaining high-quality RNA from mangrove roots and is suitable for downstream experiments such as cDNA synthesis, real-time quantitative PCR and next-generation sequencing.
Conservation, medicine etc
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37288480/
50,000 mangrove trees
Inappropriate use of government incentives to stop de-forestation
Phytoremediation -soil remediation a terrible soil microbiome Gree Technology to clean pollute soil.
According to the Rome Statute, it is the duty of every State to exercise its criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes. The International Criminal Court can only intervene where a State is unable or unwilling to genuinely carry out the investigation and prosecute the perpetrators
just sending our email to all the kodim and came across this. It's a new UN brigade I only found a 622 in Sri lanka so far
Kodim Whistleblowing system
https://www.asabri.co.id/pengaduan
A UN Army exercise?
This head of Java Field Police ran an Avian Flu Pandemic Preparedness Project (with Sir Jeremy Farrah head scientist of WHO discovered that H5N1 had emerged in nature again - that's what they studied in Vietnam.
Tubagus Arie ("Kak Arie") Rukmantara
The nickel is used for very exploited battery components
what is indoniesia's nickel used for
Oh no mining uranium working party.
ARKUS news they will get the australian nuclear submarines as soon as possilble but rigorously avoid proliferation of weapons of mass destruction!
The Committee roster can be found here.
Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic - United States House Co...
United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
Questions could profitably be asked about the following:
1. The WHO is not an honest broker.
a. Its Director-General has repeatedly lied about the WHO's 2 proposed treaties: the pandemic treaty/agreement, and International Health Regulation (IHR) amendments, claiming they do not seize sovereignty, when there is no doubt they do precisely that. See Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States' Sovereignty? by David Bell, MD, PhD and attorney Thi Thuy Van Dinh, PhD.
b. The WHO appears to have deceived the public about whether the amendments "approved" in May 2022 followed the legally required procedure of a full WHA vote. Twelve members of the European Parliament wrote to the WHO on November 28, 2023 asking for evidence that the WHO actually conducted a vote of the entire World Health Assembly to pass several new amendments in May 2022, with a 48 hour deadline. The WHO did not respond, and the twelve European parliament members declared the May 2022 amendments null and void last week.
c. The WHO's principal legal office, Steven Solomon, stated in early October that the IHR working group did not have to follow the required procedure (found in the existing 2005 version of the International Health Regulations) to make public the draft of new proposed amendments 4 months in advance of a vote. Thus, we may not see the new amendments until after the WHO members have voted on them. https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-who-will-ignore-its-own-rules
2. The WHO's proposed treaties are unconstitutional
a. They demand that nations perform surveillance of their citizens' social media footprints and censor them to prevent 'infodemics' (too much information, according to the WHO's definition), misinformation and disinformation, surveil
b. They say that nations should give up the intellectual property rights of their citizens.
c. There is no due process for the declaring or ending of public health emergencies of international concern, for which no standards exist.
3. In the Oct. 30 draft of the treaty, A new WHO Secretariat and Conference of Parties for pandemics are to be established in the future and will make their own rules. Thus, agreeing to this means providing a blank check to the WHO to do whatever it wants at some later date.
4. The 2 proposed treaties ignore existing internal law prohibiting the proliferation of biological warfare agents (the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention and the 2004 Security Council Memorandum 1540) and demand that nations search out new agents (a.k.a. "potential pandemic pathogens") and share them with the WHO, which will "share them globally." The WHO has already established a BioHub for this purpose and a Pathogen Access and Benefits System.
5. The proposed treaty and amendments also demand that nations perform 2 additional forms of surveillance of their citizens: microbiological surveillance of their populations, animals and ecosystems for pathogens, and surveillance and sharing of medical and hospital records, both of which violate privacy protections.
6. The proposed amendments remove the guarantee of "Human rights, dignity and freedom of persons" that are found in the current international health regulations.
7. The two proposed treaties are both binding, whereas the earlier IHR were recommendations only, apart from minor requirements for notification of certain outbreaks to the WHO. The two proposed documents would give the WHO and particularly its Director-General vast authority to manage healthcare globally. The current Director-General is not a medical practitioner and instead has a PhD in Community Health.
8. The WHO lacks the personnel and expertise to manage international pandemics and other health concerns. Any developed nation has within it much more capacity to understand and manage medical events within its borders, and likely international events as well.
9. The proposed treaty calls for rapidly produced vaccines and for nations to implement domestic legislation to permit the use of unlicensed medical products without manufacturer liability, instead "managing" the liability issues using existing models, such as the US' Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, which has so far compensated 8 Americans for injuries related to EUA COVID products (primarily vaccines) from the 12,358 claims filed. https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data
Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) Data | HRSA
HRSA’s CICP aggregate data for countermeasure injury claims for fiscal years 2010 – 2023.
10. It is apparent that in the process of developing the “Pandemic Accord” and amendments to the IHR, WHO/WHA positioned itself in a combined law-making/executive/expert/censorship role, which is a well-known path to usurpation of unrestrained power. It should not be surprising, therefore, that the proposed Amendments grant expressly such power to the WHO.
11. The WHO receives 85% of its funding from voluntary contributions, and only 15% from dues paid by its 194 member nations. Most of the voluntary contributions are earmarked for special projects that the WHO carries out. When President Trump withheld US funding in 2020, Bill Gates became the WHO's top funder. The (unelected) WHO serves many private masters, yet seeks to govern the world's population.
12. Virtually every recommendation the WHO made for managing the COVID pandemic was counterproductive. Why would we give the WHO the power to enforce the same bad advice on the US and world?
Meryl Nass, MD
December 11, 2023
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10811-019-02020-3
Slovakia not entering treaty
https://expose-news.com/2023/11/25/slovakia-will-not-be-entering-into/
Estonia Not entering treaty
https://expose-news.com/2023/11/25/estonia-notifies-who-that-it-rejects-pandemic-treaty/
Microsoft sacks AI Ethics team
Indonesia’s Defence Policy
I read this sentence below, I realized that Indonesia's Defence focus on free and active foreign policy as a way to peace may have led to foreign abuse -
I was shocked by Biden's body language this week, where he looked down at his knees the whole time he was deliberately lying about how the secuirty he promised for our marine resources actually meant that he planned to seize them, basically.
"In the context of international relations, Indonesia has been prioritized free and active foreign policy, and is guided by the principle of peace and a passion for independence and sovereignty."
Treaty on prohibition of nuclear weapons Images:
Images: 1) Living Sentinel and Living Pharmacy
2) Atomic Agency Relationship with the WHO and 3) Arkus relationship with Indonesia.
Treaty on prohibition of nuclear weapons
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Prohibition_of_Nuclear_Weapons
Nuclear in Health Supply Chain
