People love, only Bills Hate

Everyone hates bills. They're stressful, disproportionate, and in recent years we've found out they're fraudulent. Not that we can do anything about that..or can we? 

Last week I went to Geneva to file an Appeal against the World Economic Forum, amongst others, and asked for the whole central bank, credit, usury enslavement system to be challenged, national and personal debts wiped, their assets seized and paid into public banks in each country for return to the people.

So to keep our eyes on the prize, and our expectations high and bright, I thought I'd start sharing the lyrics to our love songs.  

If you want to know more about the case, and for a chance to participate - evidence has gone in from both jurisdictions: from living men and women and also professional, the lawyers and doctors.

 Instinct by Urgent Rougherendum

Instinct Lyrics

Can you? Will you?

Can you really be here now? Not lay claim to all the years to come?

Don't freak out about when and how\

It will be a summer of love, you'll see

What you don't know can hurt you very uch

But if you're true ,t here's a part of you that they can't touch

Skies are clear after the downpour

W'e're right here, its not like before

Showers o lemmings have run their course

Leaving us, who've found our true north

We've been betrayed. We've been waylaid

You will follow your heart

I will act in honour

But most of all I'll follow my instinct 

because my instinct tells me who you really are

and what I'm really for.

The heart can tether can blurt the lines

The mind can tell us lies

But inclination is as good as divination, 

as a guide.

If you wanna be here, be here.

If you wanna go, then go.

But this is the time to act on your hunches.

Time to have some fun.

Open your mind to change,

and change will come.

Can you be here now?

This is the time we've got.

Be here, because I'm here.

Farm Protest Report: Plants not Panels English and French

 It Is Not The Farmers Crippling Factories.  Let’s do some joined up thinking on the meat industry while we have the chance.

Well done to the farmers for protesting. This sort of demonstration is the only way that change has been affected down the years. I think particularly of slavery; the farmers being the slaves and the traders being the meat factory bosses.

For years these big players have actually been crippling Irish farmers by meeting every Friday to decide how little they are going to pay for animals. Then by taking only one or two animals at a time so farmers have to keep and feed their animals longer than is economically viable. Also, by endless non-compliance in factory machinery – adjusting their weighing and grading machines to give farmers even less again. 

All that is even before the meat plants brought the meat industry into disgrace with their food safety practices, including horse meat contamination, BSE, samples of meat containing 5 species – including rodent. 

So, farmers and all of us have to continue to be brave and let the factories close. But not let the owners slip away with their winnings, without paying redundancy to workers and fines to farmers. We must make sure as well that they don’t monopolize some other profitable and sensitive area next, like live export or water.

I mention water because these meat plants are in charge of some of Ireland’s fresh water aquifers too. They are not managing those well either, hence the recall of the contaminated ‘spring water’. At one stage, a water plant, belonging to a meat plant, was filling their bottles straight from the mains. When they were sent a bill, they got diggers in, created a massive leak, covered it over and refused to pay, claiming it was water lost not water used and sold again by them. 

The point of focusing on the bad practice of meat factories is that in this time of crisis, we can hold them accountable. They can be fined and called upon to sponsor those who have suffered as a result of their dealings.

There is a relationship between meat industry, including the IFA, the chemical giants and pharmaceutical companies who have also taken advantage of farmers, via veterinary and farm spray costs. I have worked with and know of many farmers who have not yet fully paid for feed costs from two winters ago. Also every conventional farmer (and only under 2% in Ireland are organically farmed so that is most farmers), will receive all their bills in the same week that their European grant payment comes in. It only nearly covers their bills. 

Ireland has declared a climate emergency and agreed we need to make radical changes. We need to actually reverse the process of global warming with practices that cool and draw carbon emissions out of the atmosphere. Fining the factories and agriculture chemical companies for damages to farmers would sponsor the farmers in the changes they need to make. 

The power the farmers still have is that they own a lot of land. I suggest they are heralded as heroes and guided to lead the environmental changes. This would be instead of the minister’s idea, which is to leave farmers on income support. That is, without money to even maintain their land or deal with their waste properly or fulfil their responsibility to their animals.

The Department of Agriculture has a great chance here. They can iron out the contradictions in government policy. 

It was not current ministers who negotiated the bright idea of increasing the national herd by 50% by 2020 and agreed to meeting environmental targets simultaneously. It was not current ministers who hid the first whistle blowing case, which was against a meat group. So, with their heads held high and in the light of the current climate, the agriculture department can dip into their records and find ample justification to close the meat and chemical companies down and fine them for damages to farmers and their land. These fines would make a new injection of money, from central players, rather than tax payers who, surprisingly enough, have never made a buck off the exploitation of animals or farmers or Europe. 

It can be paid directly to farmers to support an immediate ceasing of chemical use and to start projects that re-vision the use of their land. Community Supported Agriculture involves families paying a small weekly sum to a farmer, year round, in exchange for goods when they’re in season. And revision the role of animals – Their manure, for example, will be crucial in building soil and the fertility of the land. Bio-digesters can produce free electricity and energy for whole towns. 

Urgent Rougherendum Logo 

Ignorantia juris non excusat

A referendum can be run or poll done on what people are prepared to do and change and eat, to lighten their carbon and water footprint. I have composed such a survey/possible referendum questionnaire and will forward it on request. There is also the 300 pages of evidence against one meat group. However, I will not forward that as a duplicate file is already in the Department of Agriculture. It can now be used, alongside evidence already in the public domain, against the other main players in the meat and agri chemical companies. 

Closing the slaughterhouses might have led to a return to the kinder way of killing animals - on the farm, where they lived. Sadly, our version of a mobile slaughter service, in Ireland, are the ACS, the Animal Collection Service. They are an equally massive organization. Incredibly, they are in receipt of huge public contracts to run our dog and horse pounds. Funded by Irish tax payers’ money, the ACS business is actually registered in Riga, Latvia – the home of the biggest animal body parts factory in Europe. I mention that to flag up the risk of an increased black market in animals, alive and at the carcass stage.

Therefore, I suggest new roles and subsidies for animal care. Stop breeding would be the first. Yet, incentivize the keep and five freedoms of farm animals. Pigs for example are good at aerating the soil and preparing land for new uses. Get them out of the crates. Chicken litter and every other natural woody-waste can be used to make biochar – an old skill and natural charcoal is being utilized in other countries, recognized as capable of permanently drawing out and sealing greenhouse emissions from the atmosphere, improving the condition of animals in feed, fertilizing soil in an accumulative way for nutrient density and natural water filtration. 

Eliminate the contradictions in policy. The farmers lose revenue and their livelihoods at every turn. They are not allowed to sell an animal or eat it, if it has lost an ear tag. If the hay and feed are expensive, due to climate chaos and failed crops, they bear the cost of that. If one in the herd is identified as having TB, however pre-symptomatic, they have to pay for it to be taken away when its carcass is then treated exactly the same when it reaches the factory, as healthy cows. If sheep are killed by dogs, the farmers are not allowed to keep the lamb for their own freezer. They have no recourse to compensation if there is any attack on their animals or even if the factory weighing machines are found to be non-compliant to ‘outside the tolerance level’. 

Compare this to the meat plants who duplicate pallet labels and disrupt traceability. They can lay off staff without notice. They can decide an unfair price for animals that does not cover the cost of rearing them. They can make trades with other countries to profit and somehow are allowed to represent Ireland. This cannot be right. 

When helping raise the food safety issues, it became apparent that that the legal system, policy and big business all exploit the farmers. There is also a strong desire in the meat industry to push the boundaries of what they can get away with. As one farmer announced; ‘The farmers did not cause the horse meat contamination crisis! When we drop our cattle to the factory they are definitely only bovine. After they hit the factory floor, that’s when there is no saying what happens.’

So, I suggest a solution for farmers protesting, is take their side, free them from the control of meat and chemical companies. Use the power of governance and public opinion to support the farmers in protecting their livelihoods, our climate, biodiversity, land, animal welfare and public health. 

Stipulate that farmers unanimously stop using chemicals, antibiotics and enlarging their herd and inevitably their financial/environmental burden. Sponsor them to take up environmentally-guided projects, which will directly and instantly benefit and inform everyone. Let those who have profited too long, from destructive practices and products, bear the cost of the transition phase.

Oh yes and it is obviously a good idea to refuse the Brazil beef deal. No animal products should be allowed into Ireland or indeed Europe that have un-traceable welfare and conditioning practices. 

Meat plants should also not be allowed to kill animals using ‘Halal-approved’ methods. That is just a license for poor slaughter practices, bleeding out and to kill without the cost of stunning them first. 

The import bans should support tillage farmers too. They should not have to compete with imported produce from countries that use chemicals banned for use here. It is not fair. Especially as those countries using recognized toxic chemicals often have warmer weather and earlier, more consistent harvests anyway.

Take the side of farmers and the environment. This is your chance to make Ireland healthy and food independent.

 

En Francais - Machine-translated for the realisation of the vision, via the Federal Supreme Court in Switzerland who accepted our Appeal by hand last week. 

Ce ne sont pas les agriculteurs qui paralysent les usines. Menons une réflexion commune sur l'industrie de la viande pendant que nous en avons l'occasion.

Bravo aux agriculteurs pour leur protestation. Ce type de démonstration est la seule façon dont le changement s’est produit au fil des années. Je pense particulièrement à l'esclavage ; les agriculteurs étant les esclaves et les commerçants les patrons des usines de viande.

Depuis des années, ces grands acteurs paralysent les agriculteurs irlandais en se réunissant tous les vendredis pour décider du montant qu'ils vont accorder à l'achat d'animaux. Ensuite, en ne prenant qu'un ou deux animaux à la fois, de sorte que les agriculteurs doivent garder et nourrir leurs animaux plus

longtemps que ce qui est économiquement viable. En outre, par la non­conformité sans fin des machines des usines – en ajustant leurs machines de pesée et de classement pour donner encore moins aux agriculteurs.

Tout cela se passait avant même que les usines de transformation de la viande ne déshonorent l’industrie de la viande avec leurs pratiques en matière de sécurité alimentaire, y compris celle de la viande de cheval

contamination, ESB, échantillons de viande contenant 5 espèces – dont rongeurs.

Les agriculteurs et nous tous devons donc continuer à faire
preuve de courage et laisser les usines fermer. Mais ne laissez pas le

les propriétaires s'enfuient avec leurs gains, sans licencier les travailleurs ni payer d'amendes aux agriculteurs. Nous devons également nous assurer qu'ils ne monopolisent pas un autre domaine rentable et sensible, comme l'exportation

d'animaux vivants ou l'eau.

Je mentionne l'eau parce que ces usines de viande sont également en charge de certains des aquifères d'eau

douce de l'Irlande. Ils ne les gèrent pas bien non plus, d'où le rappel de « l'eau de source » contaminée. À un moment

donné, une usine d’eau, appartenant à une usine de transformation de viande, remplissait ses bouteilles directement sur le réseau. Lorsqu'ils ont reçu une facture, ils ont fait venir des creuseurs, ont créé une fuite massive, l'ont recouverte et ont refusé de payer, affirmant qu'il s'agissait d'eau perdue et non d'eau utilisée et revendue par eux.

L’intérêt de se concentrer sur les mauvaises pratiques des usines de viande est qu’en cette période de crise, nous

peut les tenir responsables. Ils peuvent être condamnés à une amende et être appelés à parrainer ceux qui ont souffert du fait de leurs
actes.

Il existe une relation entre l'industrie de la viande, y compris l'IFA, les géants de la chimie et les sociétés pharmaceutiques qui ont
également profité des agriculteurs, via les coûts des vétérinaires
et des pulvérisations agricoles. J'ai travaillé avec de nombreux agriculteurs et je connais de nombreux agriculteurs qui n'ont pas encore

entièrement payé leurs coûts d'alimentation animale il y a deux hivers. De plus, tous les agriculteurs conventionnels (et seulement moins de 2 % en Irlande sont issus de l'agriculture biologique, c'est­à­dire la plupart des agriculteurs) recevront toutes leurs factures la même semaine que
le paiement de leur subvention européenne. Celle­ci ne couvre que

presque leurs factures.

L’Irlande a déclaré l’urgence climatique et a convenu que nous devions apporter des changements radicaux. Nous devons réellement inverser le processus de réchauffement climatique grâce à des pratiques qui refroidissent et éliminent les émissions de carbone de l’atmosphère.

Imposer des amendes aux usines et aux entreprises de produits
chimiques agricoles pour les dommages causés aux agriculteurs encouragerait les agriculteurs à apporter les changements dont ils ont besoin.

faire.

Le pouvoir dont disposent encore les agriculteurs réside

dans le fait qu’ils possèdent de grandes quantités de terres.

Je suggère qu’ils soient présentés comme des héros et guidés

pour diriger les changements environnementaux.

Cela irait à l'encontre de l'idée du ministre, qui est de laisser

les agriculteurs bénéficier d'un soutien au revenu. C’est­ à­dire sans argent pour même entretenir leurs terres,

gérer correctement leurs déchets ou assumer leurs responsabilités envers leurs animaux.

Le ministère de l’Agriculture a ici une grande chance.
Ils peuvent aplanir les contradictions de la
politique gouvernementale.
Ce ne sont pas les ministres actuels qui ont négocié l’idée brillante d’augmenter le cheptel national de 50 % d’ici 2020 et qui ont convenu d’atteindre simultanément les objectifs environnementaux. Ce ne

sont pas les ministres actuels qui ont caché le premier coup de sifflet

affaire explosive, qui concernait un groupe de viande. Ainsi, la tête haute et à la lumière du climat actuel, le ministère de l'Agriculture peut puiser dans ses dossiers et trouver de nombreuses justifications pour fermer le magasin de viande et de viande. les entreprises chimiques et leur imposent des amendes pour les dommages causés aux agriculteurs et à leurs terres. Ces amendes constitueraient une nouvelle injection d’argent, provenant d’acteurs centraux, plutôt que des contribuables qui, étonnamment, n’ont jamais gagné d’argent grâce à l’exploitation des animaux, des agriculteurs ou de l’Europe.

Il peut être versé directement aux agriculteurs pour les aider à cesser immédiatement l'utilisation de produits chimiques et à lancer des projets visant à réviser l'utilisation de leurs terres. L'agriculture soutenue par la communauté implique que les familles paient une petite somme hebdomadaire à un agriculteur, toute l'année, en échange de marchandises

en saison. Et revoir le rôle des animaux – Leur fumier, par exemple, sera crucial dans la construction des sols et la fertilité des terres. Les biodigesteurs peuvent produire gratuitement de l’électricité et de l’énergie pour des

villes entières.

Un référendum peut être organisé ou un sondage sur ce que les gens sont prêts à faire, à changer et à manger, afin de réduire leur empreinte carbone et eau. J'ai rédigé un tel questionnaire d'enquête/référendum éventuel et je

le transmettrai sur demande. Il y a aussi les 300 pages de preuves contre

un groupe de viande. Cependant, je ne le transmettrai pas, car un dossier en double se trouve déjà au ministère de l'Agriculture. Elle peut désormais être utilisée, aux côtés de preuves déjà tombées dans le domaine public, contre les autres principaux acteurs des secteurs de la viande et de l’agrochimie.

La fermeture des abattoirs aurait pu conduire à un retour à une manière plus douce d'abattre les animaux : à la ferme, là où ils vivaient. Malheureusement, notre version d'un service d'abattage mobile, en Irlande, est l'ACS, l'Animal

Collection Service. Il s’agit d’une organisation tout aussi massive. Étonnamment, ils reçoivent d’énormes
contrats publics pour gérer nos enclos à chiens et à chevaux. Financée par l'argent des contribuables irlandais, l'entreprise ACS est en fait enregistrée à Riga, en Lettonie – qui abrite la plus grande usine de parties de corps d'animaux en

Europe. Je mentionne cela pour signaler le risque d'une augmentation du marché noir des animaux, vivants et carcasses.

Par conséquent, je suggère de nouveaux rôles et subventions pour le soin des animaux. Arrêter la reproduction serait la

première. Pourtant, encouragez le maintien et les cinq

libertés des animaux de ferme. Les porcs, par exemple, sont

doués pour aérer le sol et préparer les terres à de nouveaux usages. Sortez­les des caisses.

La litière de poulet et tous les autres déchets ligneux naturels peuvent être utilisés pour fabriquer du biocharbon – un vieux

Le savoir­faire et le charbon de bois naturel sont utilisés dans d'autres pays, reconnus comme capables d'extraire et de sceller en permanence les émissions de gaz à effet
de serre de l'atmosphère, d'améliorer la condition des animaux nourris, de fertiliser le sol de manière cumulative pour la densité nutritionnelle et la filtration naturelle de l'eau.

Éliminer les contradictions politiques. Les agriculteurs perdent à chaque instant leurs revenus et leurs moyens de subsistance.

Ils ne sont pas autorisés à vendre un animal ou à le manger
s'il a perdu son étiquette auriculaire. Si le foin et les aliments sont chers, en raison du chaos climatique et des mauvaises récoltes, ils en supportent le coût. Si un membre du troupeau est identifié comme atteint de tuberculose, même présymptomatique, il doit payer pour qu'il soit enlevé lorsque
sa carcasse est ensuite traitée exactement de la même manière lorsqu'elle atteint

l'usine, comme des vaches en bonne santé. Si des moutons sont tués par des chiens, les agriculteurs ne sont pas autorisés à conserver l'agneau dans leur propre congélateur. Ils n'ont
aucun recours à une indemnisation en cas d'attaque sur leurs animaux ou même si les balances d'usine s'avèrent

non conformes « en dehors du niveau de tolérance ».

Comparez cela aux usines de viande qui dupliquent les étiquettes des palettes et perturbent la traçabilité. Ils peuvent licencier du personnel sans préavis. Ils peuvent décider d’un prix injuste pour les animaux, qui ne couvre pas le coût de leur élevage. Ils peuvent faire des échanges commerciaux avec d’autres pays pour

en tirer profit et sont autorisés d’une manière ou d’une autre à représenter l’Irlande. Cela ne peut pas être vrai.

En contribuant à soulever les questions de sécurité alimentaire, il est devenu évident que le système juridique, la politique et les grandes entreprises exploitent tous les agriculteurs.
Il existe également une forte volonté dansl’industrie de la viande de repousser les limites de ce qu’elle peut faire. Comme l’a annoncé un agriculteur : "Les agriculteurs n'ont pas causé la viande de cheval crise de contamination ! Quand nous laissons tomber notre bétailà l'usine, ils ne sont définitivement que des bovins.

Une fois qu’ils ont atteint l’usine, on ne peut plus dire ce qui se passe.

Je propose donc une solution aux agriculteurs qui protestent : prendre leur parti, les libérer du contrôle des entreprises de

viande et de produits chimiques. Utiliser le pouvoir de la gouvernance et de l’opinion publique pour soutenir les agriculteurs dans la protection de leurs moyens de subsistance, de notre climat, de la biodiversité, des terres, du bien­être animal et de la santé publique.

Stipuler que les agriculteurs cessent à l’unanimité d’utiliser des produits chimiques, des antibiotiques et d’agrandir leur cheptel et inévitablement leur charge financière/ environnementale. Parrainez­les pour qu'ils

se lancent dans des projets respectueux de l'environnement, qui bénéficieront et informeront directement et instantanément tout le monde. Que ceux qui ont profité
trop longtemps de pratiques et de produits destructeurs supportent le coût de la phase de transition.

Oh oui, et c’est évidemment une bonne idée de refuser l’accord sur la viande bovine brésilienne. Aucun

produit animal ne devrait être autorisé en Irlande ou en fait, l’Europe a des pratiques de bien­être et de conditionnement introuvables.

Les usines de viande ne devraient pas non plus être autorisées à tuer des animaux en utilisant des méthodes « approuvées par Halal ». Il s’agit simplement d’une autorisation pour de mauvaises pratiques d’abattage, de saignée et de mise à

mort sans avoir à les étourdir au préalable.

Les interdictions d’importation devraient également soutenir les agriculteurs qui cultivent le sol. Ils ne devraient pas avoir à

concurrencer les produits importés de pays qui utilisent des produits chimiques interdits ici. Ce n'est pas juste.

D’autant plus que les pays utilisant des produits chimiques toxiques reconnus ont souvent des températures plus chaudes et des

récoltes plus précoces et plus régulières.

Prenez le parti des agriculteurs et de l’environnement.

C’est votre chance de rendre l’Irlande saine et indépendante sur le plan alimentaire.

How to Ensure Peace-makers become law-makers

Why the Swiss Federal Supreme Court Could  Accept Our Appeal: 

There is an admissibility clause that an 

“Appellant must have participated in the proceedings before the previous instance, or not have been given the opportunity to participate and show to be particularly affected by the appealed decision and have an interest worthy of protection in its annulment or amendment.”

I confirm that the appellants, in all the cases attached, were not given the opportunity for a hearing, and many lost their lives and livelihoods in the process. Official reservations and objections were made by  groups of nations, and these relevant considerations were ignored. 

Approaching the Majestic Federal Supreme Court

I also confirmed that the appellant (me) was “particularly affected by the appealed decision as all men and women are depending on this appeal coming before your honourable court. It has fallen to me, to provide you with the precedents you need, and witnesses, to stop the defendants’ self-promotion to a one world government and becoming international law-makers at the end of May 2024. 

The defendants' sphere of influence and resources must be reduced to nil. The defendants must not have the power to engineer the pathogens, call a pandemic, implement lockdowns or other measure, or mandate their own patented vaccines, or the deployment of engineered vectors or vaccines that they have a financial interest in. They must be arrested and the organizations dismantled.

All life on the planet; people, places and animals will be affected and we all have an interest worthy of protection, in your annulment or amendment.

What happened in the Federal Supreme Court

The Court Can Look at Criminal Ministerial Responsibility (by which I mean Wrong-doing by officials and their personal liability for their actions, decisions and their consequences). 

An Appeal would usually only look at how the law was applied in earlier cases, and not the actual claims of the case. The Federal Supreme Court make an exception in the case of Manifest arbitrariness.

Manifest arbitrariness is where: 

1) "Decisions were made capriciously, irrationally and/or without determining principle". 

I referred them to the decisions made by the defendants to not even acknowledge official correspondence from member states. This can be the only reason why earlier refusals of the Treaty and IHR in civil, administrative and criminal contexts have been ignored. 

2. "The legislature fails to make a classification by recognizing the degrees of harm" 

I referred them to how the WHO, nor any of their delegates or implementers,  do not recognise any of the high degree of harm from deploying their technologies and accept no liability for any harm. 

3. "The purpose ... (of the IHR Amendments, Pandemic Dis-Agreement or the Sustainable financing of the WHO's Treaty and UN Treaty) ... is not in consonance with constitutional values" - national and personal sovereignty and freedoms are values that are under direct threat. 

To give the court an idea of the scale of the treason, terrorism and stripping of sovereignty, I included the in the evidence that Pfizer got governments to sign contracts that put up the nation's natural resources, reserve banks and military bases as guarantees for payments.

4. When “Decisions were based on irrelevant facts, while ignoring relevant considerations, such actions reflect “arbitrariness”. 

Worse than ignoring relevant considerations, these international organizations and their funders, have been able to conduct a reign of terror, and contrive justifications such as health, to kill and extract wealth with impunity.

These are some of the reasons why I asked Switzerland to retain international jurisdiction to examine the merits of the case.

Excerpt from the Appeal

The Power of Three Witnesses To The Excess Deaths

 As we practice articulating the law from a new perspective, where we recognise ourselves as free men and women, we run into problems. It is not that we are breaking the law, quite the opposite. We are just seeing through the illegal and fraudulent systems that have had us bound. We are bound to clash with the egos of those who are wrongly empowered, like the guardi and police, who want to throw their weight around. They are not acting under their oath to keep the peace. They are glorified mercenaries, collecting fines and penalties.  We are also bound to meet resistance when it comes to unraveling the systemic enslavement of taxes, and enforcement by councils and other debt collectors.

We are at the forefront of a movement but someone has to be. If we can get our heads around this fundamental truth that we are the rightful beneficiaries of our lives, not debtors and not prepared to be demoted to collateral damage in wars, and reserve stock for governments to trade on...only then can our children enjoy this change as a reality that is respected and apparent in the quality of their lives. But we don't want to be martyrs, so in the meantime, every time you speak up, try and have at least 2 witnesses.

I don't know exactly what the power of three actually amounts to but I have experienced it for myself. Two months ago, three of us, in a firm but friendly way, directly spoke to some trespassing tenants, and got them to leave.

Who better to travel to travel to Geneva with to pose an obstacle to the evil of the one world government, The UN with the their Health body, the World Health Organization are planning an occupation so big that if it goes ahead, we're going to think the nazi concentration camps, the current Chinese Yugur camps and even North Korea's austere dictatorship start to look like a tea party, a walk in the park and a golden age of just basic oppression.  We have got to stop this. 

Everyone has this last chance to say no. A friend, Karen, wrote a brilliant 'copy and paste' job, in a group this morning, which I will type in here, so anyone reading this can use it. 

"Hello Justin" - add your public representative's name

As you probably know, Andrew Bridgen MP is leading a debate on “Covid 19 Pandemic Response and Trends in Excess Deaths" in the House of Commons on Thursday 18 April, 2pm start.  As my public representative, I would like you to attend" or host something similar in this country if you're not in GB.

"If you still believe this to be a conspiracy, despite all the evidence, as this is a debate, you will be able to put your evidence across to prove him wrong.

This is very serious and it needs to be discussed, therefore, I hope you will attend."

In Australia, Slovakia and the Philippines there are investigations going on, into the excess deaths from the shots and handling of the last pandemic. If we don't act now, there will be another pandemic called and remember that 'scientist' Jeremy Farrar OBE, is head scientist at the WHO now but he is also the patent holder for a universal avian flu vaccine. Give a thought to how profitable a bird flu pandemic would be for him personally, mandating away to his heart's content his GMO mosquitoes (yes he was the inventor of those in some Godforsaken tropical diseases unit in Vietnam, financed by Oxford university). And he's already prescribed 20 years of GMO insects (around 810 billion in total) to be released in the kingdom of Hawaii. "save 6 endangered species of birds from Bird malaria".

 If he's managed to justify that incongruent pretext for 6 birds, imagine  how long a protracted crises of lockdowns, mandated mRNA technology, and surveillance he will think he can justify for a world pandemic? Cash-cow-arama.  Talking of surveillance, they tried this track and trace system on those birds at first and guess what! hooking them up to the internet of things to watch their movements killed them stone dead. Instantly. This is what they have in mind for us.

Case Made To The Highest Court in Switzerland

What has this to do with Common Law or a hopeful bright future? Everything! We are waking up to the truth of our freedom and the authority of our jurisdiction as men and women above governments and corporations. The powers that be (but not for long) are doing everything they can to block this long-awaited correction,  to recognise the superior jurisdiction of all living beings.

If you're thinking of letting patents be held in France, don't! 1) Apart from the complete extraction of wealth generated from the energy and creativity of the Irish people, consider how 2) In France, animals share a category with furniture: No sentience, no duty of care, no value except to their owners as private property., no self determination. Oh, that could never happen to us....could it? 

Governments are only the puppets of the people here in Geneva but still they are personally liable. Why do you think Leo Varadka and Simon Coveney have stepped down in Ireland? They have realized their personal liability. Actually, the Constitution says that if a Taoiseach steps down, the whole cabinet must step down. So so-called Simon Harris, Taoiseach in waiting must step down too. Indeed, he's an ex health minister, so completely complicit in the covid crimes - and cannot be Taoiseach. They must all step down.

Anyway, good riddance to Simon Coveney in particular.  He has done too much damage as the meat industry's Agriculture minister, as Defence minister, foreign minister, perpetrator of the current destitution of the Irish people and drug pusher and public money launderer for the corporate Ireland Inc. And don't get me started on Leo Varadkar responsible for selling Ireland's water to central bank for peanuts.  They are stepping down but they all have to "go down".

We've come to Geneva to make a Statement of Claim, about these criminal charges, in the Federal criminal, patent and civil Supreme Court.

Is Geneva Sound-Proofed? We came to find out.

Thanks to my two friends in Bali who gave us enough money to get here and do this. What a considerate act of faith and empathy. May they get the recognition and reward in the not too distant future for changing the trajectory of the world. Where there will be no more United Nations with their double agency and war-mongering. 

Email to my Mum from 2010 describing the UN-facilitated round up and killing of women and children in Palestine. and the American Phosphorous re-igniting scatter bombs to make it the most excruciating death for them. Don't let them take over the world. 

Biological Scatterbomb by Urgent Rougherendum

Wearing our own merchandise today! @exitthewho

There will be no more WHO and therefore no more silent biological attacks. There will be no more national or personal debts being alleged, and repayments of high value (but not bank notes made of blood By Product by Urgent Rougherendum) will be made to the people. I suppose we collectively reckoned that peace on earth will be totally worth it!!But thanks again, you helped me just when I needed it most!

Appeal To Swiss Federal Supreme Court

 

Klaus Schwab, Jeremy Farrar et al vs Frances 

Supreme Federal Court 

Lausanne

Switzerland

11th April 2024

A. Injunction against WHA Voting: WHO Treaty / IHR 2005 Amendments

B. Prosecution for Terrorism and Violations of International Treaties

Procedure

This case originated in hundreds of applications made against the World Health Organization and the defendants, filed (or binned, we’ll never know) over the last four years. I file this application to Appeal in the Federal Supreme Court, as I am contesting multiple cases that meet the following conditions:

The court’s decision pertains to a Legislature: “A deliberative assembly with the legal authority to make laws for a political entity such as a country, nation or city”.

The Circumstances of the Case

In this case, de facto shadow directors of the WHO, United Nations, World Economic Forum, GAVI et al are already assuming legal authority to legislate for 194 United Nations Member States, despite over 160 of the member states having formally contested their authority and submitted evidence of crimes by these organizations, of genocide, terrorism, torture, experimentation without consent, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, conflicts of interest, artificial intelligence and other wireless technology with a military, retaliatory protocol,  fraudulent misrepresentation as health and climate crises, protracted enslavement of people and animals, and posing an existential threat with genetic engineering and the patenting of information which it is critical should be in the public domain. These are all charges for which the men and women at the conference of the parties are yet to answer, and which are all in violation of existing International Treaties.

At the end of May 2024 the World Health Assembly intend to meet and pretend that there is consensus to adopt Amendments to the International Health Amendments, the WHO’s Pandemic Preparedness, Prevention and Response Treaty, the continued fraudulent  extraction of wealth from nations, and men and women, in payment of alleged debt. 

I am making this appeal on behalf of all men and women of all nations and regarding all the notices, formal statements, letters, and legal proceedings as cases that have been neither acknowledged nor replied to, which shows that there is no consensus. Unelected officials of the international organizations based in Geneva are seen as criminals, who believe they have diplomatic immunity. By filing this Statement of Claim, I request that personal liability is assigned by the law of your court, and all assets, Pandemic Funds, and other monies and property are seized and returned to the people by way of public banks. As this decision should mark the end of usury, all property and territories should pass to the full ownership and other bonds made on each life returned to the people. This men and women who should be stewards of this process are ready.   

Application to the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland

I understand that “a ‘leapfrog’ appeal can be permitted if the judge in the High Court certifies (immediately after judgment or on an application within 14 days) that the “relevant conditions” are satisfied, that a sufficient case has been made out to justify an application for permission to appeal to The Supreme Court” 

Application for a ‘leapfrog’ appeal should be permitted in this instance, I believe, as the application is within 14 days of my last personal liability notice to the defendants and there is the urgency of the upcoming World Health Assembly. I hope that submitting evidence from so many member states desperate to stop the defendants before unrecoverable damage is done, that a sufficient case has been made to justify an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. The appeal meets the condition that it  is “a point of general public importance and it relates wholly or mainly to the construction of an enactment or of a statutory instrument”.

1. This honourable court’s jurisdiction is chosen in accordance with international law and is sought due to serious charges such as crimes against humanity, inter alia.

2. As we are under pressure time-wise, given the impending World Health Assembly in May 2024, I am seeking a summary judgment in an expedited manner without trial.

3. Original criminal charges and civil claims were filed in Indonesia, attached. The fee schedule and remedy to this case involve the immediate arrest of the other parties.

4. The addresses of the defendants cannot be established and the court’s assistance will be required herein as we are seeking an urgent interim interdict/injunction.

5. The defendants’ participation in international organizations does not provide immunity where ongoing crimes and commercial activity are involved.

I understand that Swiss civil procedure law is strongly oriented towards written procedure, and this is particularly true in appeal proceedings.  I also understand that an Appeal would usually only look at how the law was applied in earlier cases, and not the claims of the case. The exception in this case is Manifest arbitrariness, where 1) Decisions were made capriciously, irrationally and/or without determining principle. I refer to the decisions made by the defendants to not even acknowledge official correspondence from member states. This can be the only reason why earlier proceedings in civil, administrative and criminal contexts have been ignored. 2. The legislature fails to make a classification by recognizing the degrees of harm - or accepting liability for any harm 3. The purpose is not in consonance with constitutional values - national and personal sovereignty and freedoms are values that are under direct threat. 

Because the decision-making process and the “decisions were based on irrelevant facts, while ignoring relevant considerations, such actions reflect “arbitrariness”. This is why I ask Switzerland to retain international jurisdiction to examine the merits of the case.

Appellant

I acknowledge your admissibility clause that an “Appellant must have participated in the proceedings before the previous instance, or not have been given the opportunity to participate and show to be particularly affected by the appealed decision and have an interest worthy of protection in its annulment or amendment.”

Participation: Notices to the defendants of 1) Conditional Acceptance Pending Due Diligence, 2) Cease and Desist Military Retaliatory Protocols, 3) Personal Liability and Intention to Prosecute are attached. Plus 25 counts of criminal charges, and civil claims made by  other member states, and those we filed in Indonesia are attached.

Opportunity to participate: “or not have been given the opportunity to participate” relates to all the attached cases. This is of legal relevance because the United Nations and the World Health Organization have provided no opportunity to participate. The has been no due process, and no recourse to address reservations, whether they are immediate or planned. It has been impossible to bring criminal charges or even record a personal adverse event following a vaccine. Whether it is to a court, or police station, public representative or to inquire about liability, or create an avenue or forum for informed consent or rebuttal. This is due to censorship and often a flat denial of any question raised. 

All the attached cases required a significant amount of courage and clarity to complete. Many have had to leave their jobs to avoid complicity. Even inter-governmental negotiations and challenges have been dismissed by the WHO as misinformation.

That is the main reason I am making this appeal. To make the work, losses, conflict and struggle for agency, which humanity has experienced, actually count and go on record as making history, in the Law library of the Supreme Federal Court. 

The resistance that concerned experts have met, justifies the claim that the WHO, WMP, BRIN, DARPA et al, do not want to monitor or regulate the safety and efficacy of its recommendations, or share its research findings in the public. The coercion has been widespread.

I am an international ambassador of peace and de jure woman: frances. I am the authorised representative of the corporate entity Frances Micklem. As part of the Indonesian leadership group Gladiator Bangsa, I participated in the criminal proceedings against Save The Children Fund and World Mosquito Program, and the civil proceedings against the Health Minister of Indonesia. I confirm that the appellants, in all the cases attached, were not given the opportunity for a hearing, and many lost their lives and livelihoods in the process. 

I also confirm that I am “particularly affected by the appealed decision as everyone is relying on me to get this appeal before your honourable court, provide you with the precedents you need, and witnesses, to stop the defendants’ self-promotion to a one world government and becoming international law-makers. Their sphere of influence and resources must be reduced to nil. The defendants must not have the power to engineer the pathogens, call a pandemic, implement lockdowns or other measure, or mandate their own patented vaccines, or the deployment of engineered vectors or vaccines, they have a financial interest in. They must be arrested and the organizations dismantled. 

All life on the planet; people, places and animals will be affected and we all have an interest worthy of protection, in your annulment or amendment. 

Defendants

The man, António Guterres sometimes acting as Secretary General to the United Nations

The man, Klaus Schwab sometimes acting as Chairman of the World Economic Forum

The man, Tedros Ghebreyesus sometimes acting as Secretary General of the World Health Organization

The man, Jeremy Farrar sometimes acting as Head Scientist at the World Health Association

The man, Scott O’Neill sometimes acting as Wolbachia IP Technology patent holder and CEO of World Mosquito Program

The man, Adam Berthoud sometimes acting as Executive Director of Global Programmes, Save The Children Fund UK

The man, Blake Bedtime sometimes acting as DARPA’S Insect Allies Director 

The woman Lesley, and her husband, Gillespie sometimes acting as a Baker and sometimes Funder of Biological Weapons Program in Indonesia 

To all men and women acting as agents, involved in funding and implementing pandemic preparedness, on the pretext of Public Health, while facilitiating a protracted biological attack.

To men and women in the Yayasan Tahija Foundation

To men and women in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

To men and women acting without an oath of office, in Governments, Police and the Military 

To all men and women contributing to the World Economic Forum, the WHO Pandemic Treaty, The IHR Amendments, The Logistics Supply Chain, including AUKUS and Microsoft’s and Elon Musk’s Artificial Intelligence.  

The man Budi Gunadi Sadikin acting as Minister for Health for Indonesia

The man, Prabowo Subianto Djojohadikusumo acting as Defence Minister for Indonesia

The man, Wieded TrisnadI  Chairman of Save The Children Fund 

The woman, Bekti Andari Vice Chairman of Save The Children Fund

All men and women who are complicit in the excess deaths and systemic fraud.

There is also compensation due, and penalties for the proliferation of biological weapons, be they Wolbachia-infected Mosquitoes or genetically-engineered therapeutics, coupled with Artificial Intelligence, remotely operated and fully funded by a foreign agent. 

There had been no operational or financial due diligence done. Permissions and exemptions from regulation are usually granted, following fraudulent claims of benefits and bribery. 

The defendants are all de facto shadow directors. For a definition of a shadow director: “On a regular basis and over a period time, the majority of the directors of these organizations must perform positive acts in accordance with the alleged shadow director's instructions. If that test is met, the person is likely to be found to be a shadow director”. This will inevitably include Anthony Fauci as the man who assigns funding for medical research and other research within and beyond third level education.

In time: 

This Appeal has been made in time 

1) as the defendants have been given every opportunity to respond 2) There is no ambiguity in the 25 earlier instances, attached: The covid vaccines, masks, lockdowns, PCR tests, IHR Amendments and Political Declaration were all formally rejected in time in a myriad of formats. However, not one reservation, rejection, withdrawal or other written notice has been acknowledged by the defendants. The date for voting on the IHR Amendments and Treaty runs between the 1st April and the 26th May 2024. 

This appeal is urgent but it is in time to stop the contravening of the WHO’s own Constitution, the WEF’s own Manifesto and the UN’s own Charter, by a small conference of the parties pushing these treaties through. Finally, I wrote to the court in time - before the Treaty on the 5th April - alerting the court to the dire threat, to the jurisdiction for men and women, that the proposed treaty posed. Therefore, if that Treaty was passed, however illegitimately, I still entered this application for an appeal before my jurisdiction came into question. 

I reiterate here that Articificial Intelligence must be stopped as, due to that treaty. Whether it passed or not, AI will already have been programmed to recognise the claim to being a biological man or woman as a possible crime against humanity. Such is the extent of the madness that we have been enduring. In addition the AI will be connecting the Decision of the Supreme Court in America that the vaccinated are no longer human but ‘trans human’. The connection of these two legislative developments could remove the jurisdiction of all people and place it below governments and corporations - One of the cases I attach is the resignation letter of the UN Human Rights Commissioner, on this matter, where no one is afforded human rights. 

Cost

I would like to enquire as to the cost of this appeal, as it is a public interest case brought by one individual, spanning criminal, administrative, civil and patent law.

I note that “the decisions of the last cantonal instance and the Federal Patent Court can be appealed before the Federal Supreme Court (article 72 of the FCA). The appeal in civil matters before the Federal Supreme Court is subject to certain conditions. Generally, a minimum value of the claim is required (15,000 Swiss francs in employment and tenancy law cases; 30,000 Swiss francs in any other cases). I hope that “this minimum value of the claim is not required. Although the value of the claim is indeed infinite, if we can reinstate our standing as beneficiaries in our own lives, create peace and safety, in every nation and reclaim our freedom and dignity, and that of our fellow animals.

 Furthermore, another condition is met:

• The Federal Supreme Court may accept that a fundamental point of law is at stake.

• The settlement will be a return of the monies extracted through fraudulent debt collection, both national and individual.

Can the costs of this Appeal be waived as it is in the public interest?

I am appealing before the Federal Supreme Court, against the decision by the UN to empower themselves, through the WHO as legislators of International Law. This must take place before the World Health Assembly at the end of May 2024.

We enclose earlier cases that would bring peace for definite, if the instances were counted and collectively succeed in prosecuting the defendants. This is a chance to return the course of history to the conscious evolution we should all be enjoying at the moment. 

We’re appealing against the decision by the defendants to empower themselves, as legislators of International Law and claiming they are acting with intent to harm. 

1) Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, North Korea, Eritrea, Iran, Nicaragua, Russia, Syria, Venezuela, and Zimbabwes reject unilateral coercive measures. Instead of unanimous adoption of the Political Declaration on 26th September 2023, the United Nations General Assembly UNGA just announced after receiving the letter that they would have to approve the Declaration using a vote count instead of a unanimous agreement - Changing their own process. 

2) Group of Friends in Defense of the UN Charter: Algeria, Angola, Belarus, Bolivia, Cambodia, China, Cuba, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Iran, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Nicaragua, the State of Palestine, the Russian Federation, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Syria, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe. https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2022/11/05/2799414/group-of-friends-in-defense-of-charter-of-united-nations-releases-statement

3) G77 which is now a group of 134 developing countries who contested the legal standing of the meetings of the SDGs Summit and the High-Level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention.

designed to promote its members' collective economic interests and create an enhanced joint negotiating capacity in the United Nation expanded to 134 member countries. G77

4) Netherlands - Medicines Agency early personal liability notice 2021 of vaccine deaths 

5) Slovakia - Prime MInister Robert Fico

6) Indonesia - a) Senate b) Precedent  2008 Case c) Dr Widya Murni World Council For Health Vote to Exit The WHO

7) America - Dr Peter McCullogh 

8) Fahrie Hassan - Conflict of Interests World and Africa-Specific

9. Hawaii Unites - 20 years of GMO insects, no monitoring and no environmental impact report

10. Singapore accidental 3 female GM Mosquitoes replace a whole population (Gene Drive)

11. 2008 Indonesia Refuses Material Transfer of Viruses (now called pathogen-sharing)

12 Bill Bates versus the US - Manufactures consent in developing countries by funding universities.

13. Elon Musk, 180-day experimental permit to radiate people and deliver  genetic modifications using electrical-pulses, plus data collection without consent.

14. George Soros vs France. Insider trading and alleged responsibility for forced migration. 

15. Central bank challenge for printing bank notes using pigs blood, and losing the ‘Right to Rescue’ animals in court.

16. AUKUS nuclear partnership and UN’s

17. WEF’s Pascal Najadi case: Filed charges against the President, to remove diplomatic immunity for WEF & WHO, for Covid Crimes.

18. Director of the New York Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Craig Mokhibe  Resignation Letter - the UN is party to Genocide 

19. Estonia’s Parliament reject the WHO

20. Ireland’s Crotty vs the government - Won the case that there should be no International Agreements without a Referendum

21 Stopping AI because of its always-active military protocols: Deployment & Retaliation

22. Vaccine Deaths and Warnings: Pfizer Found Guilty in UK Cases

23. South African Contracts - Pfizer payment Guarantee Required, including natural resources, reserve banks and military bases.  

24. Concealment of Data Case: Thailand 

25. Private .. Banking is illegal and CBDCs are a tool of surveillance, control and continued fraudulent debt enslavement. Professor Richard Werner International Public Banking Alliance

Establishing direct lines of liability for the defendants and their corporate entities are our only chances at creating peace and mutual respect, with land healthy enough for subsistence with organic measures and not one bi lab, or child down a mine to supply components for batteries. And not one solar panel on land that could be productive, and when roof space is available.  

We are relying on the honourable Court to hold the Geneva-based defendants accountable for deploying bioweapons and using patent laws to protect dual use research and thereby preventing independent testing or risk assessment of engineered products. I hope that this case will then become the precedent so that parallel agencies and corporations around the world, still perpetuating crimes against humanity, can be successfully challenged. 

 In an attempt to sidestep the serious reservations, the WHO responded by entering an additional Article into the proposed Treaty that reads: ‘No observations will be permitted’.   A cursory look at any other International Treaties show that observations make up the most important instrument of sovereign states granting exemptions from adhering to parts of an agreement that are not in alignment with their constitution. The defendants are not in alignment with human values and we do not consent.

We have precedents and law ready. There are many groups of lawyers and doctors who would be grateful to support this appeal and find out their efforts have not gone to waste. However, I believe their time would be much better spent if they were given new responsibilities and opportunities to guide people in taking responsibility for their own health. 

I made a commitment to myself twenty five years ago that I would end animal suffering and wake people up from the cognitive dissonance around loving animals on the one hand and still allowing them to live absolutely unendurable lives, on the other. Later, I made a commitment to my father - who was a High Court judge and who wrote some of the Unfair Dismissal law and many books reflecting on what makes a life worth living) that I would stop the production of agricultural chemicals and patenting of seeds. It never occurred to me that it would be our lives and our freedom that are gone. Surveillance; microchip implants; the theft, pooling and corruption of our blood and water. The deployment of diseased organisms into us, using mosquitoes and forced medical procedures. And the wild megalomania of genetic engineering, spending public money on the research and then patenting the results. And building nuclear submarines and modular reactors and telling us they’re green, and economical and a deterrent. And the realisation that we’re each running up fraudulent, but still insurmountable, debts while funding the whole lot. I mean really, the audacity of the defendants and the passive aggression of their ignorance and their deadly agenda. They have given themselves away though now and I am so grateful to have an 11th-hour opportunity to lodge this appeal. My grandfather was recognised for his contribution to the arts as a Companion of Honour; a medal that reads “In action faithful and In honour clear”.  

Please honour the people in your decision, and suspend the IHR Amendments and Treaty immediately and permanently. Thank you.

Frances of the Micklem family

All rights reserved

Witness 1: Emer:Marie of the Kelly family                       

All rights reserved

Witness 2 

Darren:Anthony  of the Fahy Family

All rights reserved