Opt Out of Leaving Our Bodies To Biotech

 A priority as Global Ambassador Disaspora for Social Justice is to help people identify where the “silence procedure” is being used to introduce legislation that violates the Nuremburg Code on human experimentation. People need to know how to opt out and advocate for your children in schools and parents in care. Power of attorney? Agency? We have to use it or lose it.

The Cheek of It. Covertly claiming our lungs and ever other part of our bodies, using an image of rainbow-coloured ribbon lungs. Read the article and formally write and OPT OUT.

Things are happening faster than we thought: Simon Harris was openly announced a Young World Economic Forum Leader just last week (although I wrote about his WEF appointment and training before the pandemic). Already we have new ‘laws’ being dished out. I use the word ‘laws’ loosely because legislation by people in public office while involved in commercial activity is fraud, extortion & misconduct. The narrative that policies are for our benefit is insulting, when they are nothing more than a money-making venture with intention to control people’s lives or disable us to maintain a market for pharmaceutical products, and kill the rest of us. 

We are not even safe when we die now: ‘Following a change in law, after the 17th June everyone will be considered an organ donor after they die’. Organ donations have been a massive illegal trade for decades but now biotechnology companies want it formalized. But everyone has a say now, in when we are going to die. No one should get comfortable with deciding when someone else dies, especially if there’s a competitive market for our body parts. We are not part of the meat industry … yet. Think about it: What with unknowable policies in hospitals, where people are taken after accidents; ‘assisted dying’ being somehow acceptable (and recently I have seen articles saying that people in critical conditions are a financial burden, so we can see where that is going; a financial decision as to when lives have to be finished off. Add to that, the premature consent from relatives, with no doubt emotional pressure of being told the injured party’s organs could 'save another life. What with the multiple unregulated laboratories and foreign direct investment. Who is going to be able to say no to this mutilation of the dead? They don’t only want functioning organs. 

They want to be able to play with, modify, clone, edit, and patent our cells and blood and own our gene sequence. 

Remember when the cervical smear samples were not tested for cervical cancer indicators? The cells in our cervix are the most fertile - obviously - and they were valuable to replicate and use for dual use research, now understood to be the publicly funded proliferation of biological weapons. Pharmaceutical companies hide test results with intellectual property rights, military protect the disclosure of results on ‘security’ grounds. This is the ‘pathogen-sharing’ disgrace that the WHA can’t agree on. Our physical bodies are up for grabs.

New Law 17th June Assuming we are organ donors