Thursday, February 3, 2022

Why was there no referendum or consent asked for 5G

So last week, I wrote to the members of NPHET and this week I am writing to Connect, the lesser known group of lunatics (including the minister for the environment) who are approving and implementing new technologies like they are going out of fashion - regardless if they might mean the destruction of all nature and, yes, that includes us. 

Wifi Masts Ireland -1000s of them despite cancer clusters and the end of biodiversity

The letters go something like this: 

I am writing to you in a personal capacity, to say that I am holding you personally responsible and accountable for your oversight of, participation in, and contribution to the Connect group who have allowed new technology to inundate Ireland (Map attached), with no health or environmental research or independent health studies conducted or reviewed by different bodies here. There were no risk assessments, public health studies, or cautionary principle-staggering of implementation. This meant effects could not be monitored or the roll-out stopped if there were unforeseen adverse events (as documented in the "Resonance, Beings of Frequency" documentary at this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFR5EtO_zdM, which I would hope you are familiar with. Nor was there a control group established (wifi-free area and population) for the experiment. You approved the rollout during the lockdowns of the pandemic, making it impossible to distinguish which health issues related to which contamination or stressor. 


Now there is evidence mounting that the technology can interact with the bodies of the people who have had the genetically engineered vaccines. I witnessed my own father's life turned off and on again 7 times over 24 hours before his final death. His health was destroyed after the Oxford vaccine - so called to appeal to the imagined authority of Oxford University, to suggest safety and rigorous research. This matches Ireland's own 'Garnering Public Consent For The Covid Vaccines' policy

Ireland's Covid Vaccine Public Consent Pollicy (I'll link this when I find it again!)
which states that 1) people are "used to" vaccines and 2) they "trust doctors", so 3) they should be administered by GPs to encourage uptake. 4) The public should only be "told what they need to know"; ie. that it is a vaccine and recommended by their doctor. The sequence of injuries in my father's case were Reversed Myelitis; chronic fatigue with weakened bones, and inability to lift his legs. Then MDS or IPT which is a sort of anaemia; radical loss of red blood cells and inability for the bone marrow to make the new cells, but no shortage of iron, so previous treatments for anaemia could not be used, as they would add a heavy metals poisoning. There were over 800 cases of MDS in the UK. Doctors in Ireland are not helping patients record adverse events. Indeed they are hostile and deny any correlation regardless of how blatant. I don't know where the Hippocratic Oath went, starting 'Do no harm'. Now they have been actively recruited to push a narrative that is extremely profitable to pharmaceutical companies and justifies emergency measures and control by government.

But now they have children being lined up for a clot shot by their parents



There is already a criminal case for misconduct in public office, gross negligence and manslaughter, that has been accepted by the International Criminal Court: Ref 6029679/21. I have an outline of the 12 points made in their response to claims from other Irish citizens, if you would like me to forward it.

 

A complaint of assisted suicide applies to the vaccine technology, NPHET and Europe's Gain of Function council (also based in Ireland - probably as we are the animal testing capital of the EU with zero adherence to animal welfare compliance), but the stronger complaint of manslaughter is founded for the infrastructure and turning on of 5G, as well as earlier electromagnetic Eirgrid, Esb and Broadband radiating infrastructure. And most likely Ecocide too. 

We have not consented via referendum to the roll out of 5G, and there was a lot of opposition that was over-ridden. Co. Clare was one county who fought a hard legal battle to remain free of 5G, as we did here in Kilkenny. There was no chance of informed consent as no information has been circulated about the pros and cons of the new technology. The manufactured consent was achieved by coupling dangerous advances in technology with terms like 'Green Technology', 'Smart Farms', 'Health' and 'Wellness' and 'Connectivity'. And most appallingly, attaching Environmental objectives and Green Deal money to technology, when it works one hundred percent against nature.  

I take this opportunity to say that if you allow gene edited seeds unlabelled as GMO (merely because lobbyists argue no second species was added in the engineering) or you allow the genetic engineering of algae "for carbon capture", which could disturb the gene pool and with it our oxygen supply, there may be questions asked too, like why was it allowed and what made you think it was safe. I sent you, myself in July 2021 a white paper about the dangers of genetically modified microbes - GMO 2.0s.

I also wrote to you personally many times in 2020 about establishing a public bank with a new golden peg - Ireland's precious fresh water resource. You did not even make a statement or murmur when Varadker and Donohoe met with a bank in private and rumours suggest that Ireland's water exchanged hands for a miesly 8 billion. It was not covered or refuted in the news either. Furthermore, I am well aware that you would not even meet with the International Cooperative arm of the Sparkassen public bank, who extended their offer to help with the implementation of public banking for a second time. So, billions have still passed through Ireland inc. via foreign direct investment, contributing nothing to the Irish economy or state, through taxes.   Adding gross negligence to extreme hardship for the people you are supposedly a public servant for, Brexit should mean that the new Import Duty and VAT (on everything even under 20 euros now) but I have paid amounts of 850 and 300 - both of which had to be queried, found to be wrong and reduced - would be a marked income for Ireland. But  no. Every cent is paid to Barclays, not even an Irish bank. An English bank.  

In May 2020, I shared the article below following contacting 'Connect' to talk to their health and safety department to request information on what 5G studies, risk assessments were available and to offer to put a control group together at my own organic farm and include the many other locations from the Stop 5G contingent. I was told there were no medical doctors, let alone department committed to investigating the short/medium and long term effects of wifi, of different strengths, the masts and the satellite deployment, or to offer a control group, not exposed to electromagnetic frequencies, and monitor the health, productivity and biodiversity of participants and their protected land. 

I also applied to manage the National Biodiversity Data Centre to recruit citizen scientists in all universities to conduct 'before and after' data around the multitude of short-range 5G masts, to make sure that there would be evidence to stop the rollout if it was killing the wildlife or contaminating/changing the structure of water/food or air. That tender submission was circulated and sent to you, so there is no excuse that you didn't know. Indeed, a lawyer in the above case has stated categorically that not knowing the dangers will not count as a defence in court. 

You may think that you will never have to formulate an answer about the Covid 19 virus, in the context of the new technology. Some studies explain how viruses emerge from poisoning, rather than transmit like bacteria between people, and how the widespread die-off of our kind, as we have seen in the last two years, is directly connected to the introduction of dangerously unhealthy frequencies and toxins that degrade our ability to survive and care for each other. They draw a parallel with historical outbreaks and give evidence for a correlation with the new technologies of those times. 

I was told by one politician in writing 'WHO says it's safe' but imagine if you were asked in court about any of the above points and you could not prove there were dangers you had intentionally overlooked. This is your responsibility, even if only in part.

The vaccines are the first drugs to ever come on the market, let alone be widely administered, where their active ingredients are not in the public domain. Even under Freedom Of Information requests, they were protected for ‘commercial reasons’. Gain of Function research results are guarded as a matter of national security, while their 'benefits to society' are simultaneously upheld as their main justification for permits and funding. 

5G, bioengineered microbes and high voltage technologies are all protected by GDPR for commercial reasons while crossing every indefensible boundary of our privacy; even our DNA and bodily integrity. Moving us, unbeknownst to many, from human to transhuman and mainly sick and dying.

This all means that we cannot test drinking water to make sure we haven’t contaminated not only our blood but also the future health of all generations (and, of course, only the company producing them can test for and vouch for their safety, while simultaneously profiting and all with no risk). It does not matter how you re-write the Consent Process for the Vaccination Programme, our right to maintain our Bodily Integrity must still be in the Constitution - if it is not, the point was not deleted following a referendum. We do not consent and those that have could not have informed consent. 

 

Ignorance of what the adverse effects including death and ecosystem collapse will not reduce your liability. The international criminal court confirms in their final point that “If you believe you are a victim of crime and there is no evidence to the contrary a crime must be recorded.” It is virtually impossible to report an adverse reaction to the vaccines, let alone the dangers of living close to high voltage pylons. I have recorded both in my personal experience, as a citizen and as a legal advocate. 

You may or may not know that only individuals can be held responsible; corporations and pharmaceutical companies, manufacturers and governments are beyond liability. Although industry know that all the swine flu vaccine injuries are having to be paid out and the HPV vaccine injury as well had to be paid by the State, as the manufacturers have some law supporting exemption. Please consider all these matters and how you would defend your actions. I have lost family and friends to financial destitution suicide and vaccine injury, yet none to the pandemic. The NPHET meeting minutes confirm in their 'Matters Arising' that there was no data circulated on which to make those decisions they made; to kill the livelihoods, muzzle us, allow the power grab of our food and water resources and ability to sustain ourselves or manage our own health, and coerce people into invasive and dangerous testing and medical procedures.