Tuesday, May 5, 2026

Digital ID comment - today by twelve thirty BST

Make your Comment here ASAP Thanks. Use my answers or sentences thereof if you want!

What do you think the main benefits will be, if any, for the government’s new national digital ID system?


 It will be a vast and inexcusable expansion of the birth certificate fraud, by corporate government, the next unprecedented wealth extraction from the living population, as livestock for trade. So the benefits will only be to government, their shadow directors and the eugenicists Tony Blair's son who you gave the contract too to manage this data, despite his incompetence and lack of expertise in managing anything as his training company was in debt until his worth skyrocketed with sponsorship from Gates Musk, who will benefit inordinately from this data theft.

What do you think the main drawbacks will be, if any, for the government’s new national digital ID system?

The government has no right to surveil and track the people, claim their information. All the birds that were tracked in the Kingdom of Hawaii, with this digital interface died immediately. The frequency of the network is contrary to biological function/survival. You do not have consent and you intend to coerce the population again to accept this dangerous technology and bio-technology, without oversight or accountability.  There will be no one and no way to correct breaches of private information, and mistakes People themselves will be shut out of their own lives, wrongly attributed criminal records, for normal activities that were not illegal the day before, will be impossible to take off the system. It will give public servants and private interests, an inappropriate and despicable remote power over the people that employ them to provide services.

One of the government’s aims for the new national digital ID system is to make it easier for people to prove who they are. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposed system could help achieve this aim, and why?  

We simply do not believe that the government aim  to make it easier for people to prove who they are. Already there are two part verifications to authorising a payment, all dependent on technology. It is absurd to talk about easier when the biggest market it data. Governments have given all our intellectual property away already and ability to claim royalties or make a living. You have allowed the contamination of food and medicines with technology and this new market, using biological assets plays into the World Health Organisation's 'Pathogen Sharing and Benefits strategy', where diseases can be identified, rightly or wrongly, they must be disclosed, like Ragwort or other invasive species, if discovered, and dysfunctions will be created specifically to justify the roll out of whatever pharmaceutical companies and governments have a stock pile of. Consider the Post Office Scandal, where honest, competent men and women were held responsible for mistakes and glitches in a new technology that didn't work and people were bankrupted and their reputations and lives ruined. 

The government proposes to use the digital ID system to enable more modern, efficient and personalised public services. Which public services would you want the government to prioritise making faster or more efficient using the system?


I think the clue is in the words 'public services'. Government should abandon digital ID, disable the foreign military technology and network, which has been erected across the country, with no planning permission and with fraudulent supporting studies from companies that were dissolved 15 years earlier and redirect the contract money to the services, paying people to provide for each other. The digital ID will only be efficient in hiding the accountability of service providers as people will never be able to prove what happened, and how we were treated and what money we had in our accounts, what doctors advised us to take, what lawyers and court systems took from our estates and evidence they took as verbatim, without any truth testing possible. 


The national digital ID will be issued as a credential (or digital document) for storage on a compatible device, similar to how people already store payment cards and tickets on their smartphones. Are there technical issuance standards, beyond those already used by the GOV.UK Wallet, that we should be building the national digital ID to?

Yes

Please explain your answer and provide examples of the technical standards that should be used.


Institute For Responsible Technology would tell you in a heart beat. The government lie as to the objective of the digital ID is at the heart of the problem for building it and regulating it. There has been no interest shown  to date, in rigorous standards or debate in regard to safety or efficiency. Look at the mobile phone and wifi mast safety studies. There has been only one done, 30 years ago that showed that exposure to wifi for 15 minutes created an adrenalin emergency response for 10 constant days. That study was buried and old and young carry phones now that are disrupting their ability to grow, think, recover, breathe and other functions.  Government's unfounded and assumed right to 'create legislation' and cherry pick 'technical standards', while simultaneously indemnifying all corporations from adhering to regulations, let alone compensating people for damages and deaths, combine to make this government's most sinister project yet.  Government has already put into legislation in April 2020 that digital health records and refusal to take experimental technology into their body, can serve as offences that can lead to inprisonment and seizure of property. The government plan is one hundred percent against the law and against international law, and the Nuremburg Code, and we reject digital ID in its entirety.

Do you think one area will be more affected than another? Yes, England.



I use the example of farmers to describe the impact of government's changing policies and positive discrimination. Government bodies and the industry giants that direct them, like Glasgow Finance for Net Zero, change each year and fund the uptake of different agricultural biotechnologies and chemicals and systems in Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, England etc. There is no continuity of funding and no saying whether what is done this year may be against new legislation brought in next year. People will be penalised, The farmer's unions say that England is being particularly targeted with these changing goal posts and with digital ID, government will not need to justify any decision just implement it. Only a few years ago, there was a policy of a 'just transition' towards the biodiversity objectives. Now you want to regulate people and deregulate the destructive corporations, for your profit.  

 In Malaysia, the CBDC digital currency, closely related to proving who they were by digital ID, 80 million bank accounts and all that was in them were lost. The government has weaponised the remaining values of the population, and is intentionally setting groups against each other on every pretext and ideology.In Indonesia, over a million votes were not accepted, even with a wet ink signature because of reliance on digital ID, clearly set to reject votes from people voting for the candidate the government did not want. The ID will exacerbate all these things. 

Are there any ethical factors government should consider that relate to an individual deleting their digital ID?

The government cannot guarantee the safety of our data. The government has already enlisted foreign technology by an international group who have made their fortunes by selling data and conducting 'gains of function' to interface, with the human body, designing and selling the devices that will store the information, essentially recording man, woman and child's movements in real time, and giving them and the government an opportunity to block interactions, purchases, movements, however urgent, for whatever reason, from the central control, manned only by artificial intelligence, programmed for an undisclosed objective.    

Are there any ethical factors government should consider that relate to revoking (i.e. cancelling) an individual’s digital ID?


It is one thing cancelling people's platforms for expression, like Facebook, but cancelling someone's ID is known to be 100% disempowering in every sense of the word. Consider all the displaced people from wars and drought, who have not been able to bring their passports or do not have one. People will not be able to live, if you claim the arbitrary power to dismantle their ability to access their independent means.  Government has no 'robust' processes. The food, medicines, education, politics, everything is intentionally corrupted in order to position governments to implement a nanny state, and then a police state. It is a lie to call it an application for a digital ID, when you know very well that companies, insurance, loans, funding and job applications will all start to require the ID, under the heading One ID or something that sounds reasonable but is inextricable. Even if you do cancel someone's ID or a man or woman deletes their own, the result is the same, that all their information is still in circulation and on record, with massive unconscionable impacts. All of which government politicians know so personal liability must be considered and please consider stopping the ID before it is too late.