| people on all 196 so-called ‘un member states‘ reject the ihr and amendments |
|
it is now confirmed formally, on and for the record as of this day, the seventeenth day in july, in the year two thousand and twenty five (17/7/25) that we reject the international health regulations and all amendments, as a fraudulent document and a declaration of war against all life. |
|
commercial activity voids diplomatic immunity from investigation and prosecution |
|
we do not recognize your authority and are currently in the process of removing your diplomatic immunity from accountability, investigation and prosecution. i imagine you are following the case against bill gates, pfizer’s ceo and the other 18 men and women in the netherlands currently for the intentional contamination of mrna injections with lethal poisons and technologies. it would be absurd to empower governments with these shadow directors further and the time has come to answer and provide remedy for your many evil acts, by way of fraud, impersonation, incorporation, human trafficking and other unconscionable and abhorrent actions, despite being tasked with the protection of the people. |
|
why this formal rejection is from unincorporated men and women assembling to govern, not from the corporate entities ‘heads of state’ |
|
the superior authority of the living jurisdiction has been eroded, diminished and replaced with corporate entities and persons, such as you, in such a way as to deceive people and convey us into jurisdictions outside of those applicable to the flesh and blood of our being. therefore, you will have to accept this formal notification from the last men and women standing on land and soil, rather than wait for a rejection from a ‘head of state’, whose legitimacy must also be decided by our grand juries, peaceably and lawfully assembling for the purpose of self- governance and reparation. |
|
your tacit agreement with the charges of covid crimes and continued proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. |
|
your tacit agreement has been agreed by way of un-rebutted affidavit and statements of fact, that genocide has already been committed with the deployment of biological and radiological weapons. your refusal to seek consent violates all international treaties and national laws but your silence has created a lasting tacit and binding agreement through acquiescence and royal assent by default. this renders all past and future contracts void. we do not stand under any corporate authority.and we did not grant you any authority to govern. therefore, you should prepare to be considered personally liable and only remaining in office to answer for your actions, help decommission dangerous technologies and departments, and coordinate remedy and compensation. |
|
corporations are not a lawful administration |
|
the united nations, wef and all related incorporated bodies have no legitimate authority and we instruct you that this be noted too. even courts, all operating under admiralty law now, have only made the presumption of law. a presumption is nothing of material substance and any presumption can be dismissed by a formal challenge. consider this a formal challenge and look up for yourselves the presumptions of law. this is especially in reference to the office of the judiciary, including the administrative, criminal, civil and patent courts at the federal supreme court, lausanne, switzerland. all are nothing more than a sub office of a commercial body and the status and standing of any judge or magistrate currently on this land has no greater status or standing or authority than a manager of a shop. we do not intend to let these captured incorporated bodies have any control over the superior jurisdiction of the living men and women. all executable orders and documents, surely especially international treaties must be autographed by human hand and in wet ink by a named authoritative living being who takes full responsibility. none of this has happened. |
|
the ihr and all the world health organization, assembly, un and wef business comprise criminal offences, detrimental to the people on this planet. from this day forward as of the 17th july, 2025, let it be known that any transgression onto this sanctuary other than by invitation, is a recognised act of war and aggression. we have the right by the very fact that we live to protect our life, the life of our loved ones and other living creatures. these are the long standing law and traditions of the land. |
|
nations who have already rejected the international health regulations amendments |
|
argentina, israel, iran, russia, netherlands and the czech republic have already rejected the ihr and the us has already exited the world health organization altogether. some have made simple statements such as ‘there hasn’t been time to read the ihr amendments’ and ‘the who omitted to highlight some of the important changes in bold’. they have rejected them in full until a proper study, democratic debate and consultation can take place. there has been financial negotiation in the background of these decisions too. |
|
financial negotiations with member states prior to rejecting the ihr amendments, proves the IHR are only instruments to expand and control financial markets. |
|
- in israel, the only successful 2-day ceasefire was negotiated with the who, allegedly to inoculate against ‘vaccine-induced polio’ with a novel (enigneered) oral solution, containing god knows what, to any surviving palestinian children, despite no food or water or medical supplies had been allowed in for months and since. that may have satisfied the who’s determination to proliferate biological agents directly into as many populations as possible.
- the perpetual war and weapons trade by israel may have satisfied the wef and central bank.
- irael’s partnership with microsoft ai to target and approve and guide all strikes with no human oversight might have satisfied bill gates. perhaps he doesn’t feel the need to force further biotech on israel itself.
- for the us, the ihr amendments have not yet been directly rejected yet, leaving the population vulnerable to any and all experimental and emergency mandates.
- bill gates has made up the financial shortfall 1.6 billion dollars, from the us withdrawing its funding from the who. this has led to this one man having an inappropriate level of financial leverage in other countries. populations have found themselves unable to refuse the products he is invested in;
- experiments involving all people in indonesia, require that they take an experimental tuberculosis injection and live gene-edited malaria parasites, eat foods made from genetically engineered maggot flour and accept gmo seeds known to destroy human and habitat health.
- in britain, after denying geo-engineering was even being done by toxic aerosol depositis, the government are now promoting it as a national strategy backed by bill gates to ‘dim the sun’ despite already destroying food security and health there and around the world.
- after his visit to brazil, police were empowered to go door to door forcing injection on babies whose parents cannot prove that they’ve had a whole range of vaccinations.
- in africa, thousands of women and girls received tetanus injections, only to find that they had received a sterility drug instead.
even people in incorporated national governments cannot contract with or work for these racketeers without being liable for claims of gross misconduct in public office. - across europe tissues and organs are harvested without consent, through smear campaigns, fraudulent pcr test and other unnecessary blood tests, as well as if you are unconscious or found dead.
millions of excess deaths have lead to millions of life insurance policies having to be paid out. the ihr amendments would commit member states to open funding for the who, so the same big investors can make back their losses |
|
have you made a note yet that the ihr regulations and amendments have been rejected?
we require an acknowledgement and receipt for this affidavit. |
|
the u.s. health insurance sector lost $55.72 billion in market value from july 1–8, 2025 vast losses like that only happen after a catastrophe like a world war. this time the excess deaths correlate with the fast-tracked gene therapy injections and boosters, on who advice. |
|
financial conflicts of interest: |
|
- bill & melinda gates foundation investments: the bill & melinda gates foundation, with assets of approximately $46.8 billion as reported in its 2018 financial statements, holds significant investments in pharmaceutical and agribusiness companies. notably, the foundation increased its holdings in monsanto to over $23 million by 2010, as reported by democracy now (source: democracy now, "gates foundation criticized for increasing monsanto investment,"
- 2010). it also holds stakes in vaccine manufacturers like glaxosmithkline and merck, creating potential conflicts as the foundation’s grants align with these companies’ profitability. for example, the foundation committed $4.1 billion to gavi, the vaccine alliance, including $750 million in seed funding in 1999, and $1.5 billion in 2007 for an advanced market commitment to incentivize vaccine production (source: gates foundation annual report, 2018; gavi.org, "bill & melinda gates foundation pledges"). these grants promote vaccine markets, benefiting the foundation’s investment portfolio.
- influence on global health organizations: the foundation is the who’s second-largest donor, contributing over $4.84 billion between 2000 and 2020, surpassing contributions from nations like australia ($381 million), canada ($1.3 billion), france ($1.6 billion), germany ($1.9 billion), russia ($73 million), and the uk ($2.1 billion) combined (source: who donor report, 2020). this funding grants significant influence over who policies, including vaccine prioritization. the foundation also provided $100 million in 2017 to the coalition for epidemic preparedness innovations (cepi) for vaccine development against emerging diseases and $275 million in 2015 to the global financing facility for women, children, and adolescents (source: cepi annual report, 2017; world bank, "global financing facility launched," 2015). additionally, the foundation’s $1.5 billion contribution to the global fund to fight aids, tuberculosis, and malaria since 2002 further cements its influence (source: global fund, "donor contributions," 2020).
- media sponsorship: the foundation allocates approximately $250 million annually to media partnerships, including $3.5 million to pbs newshour in 2010 for global health reporting, funding for the guardian’s global development website, npr’s global health coverage, bbc media action, and abc news’ world health coverage (source: gates foundation grants database, 2010-2020). a 2011 report by the center for media and democracy noted that these partnerships create a “gates-funded media ecosystem” that may bias reporting toward foundation initiatives (source: center for media and democracy, "gates foundation and media," 2011). for example, our world in data, which tracks covid-19 statistics, received $5 million from the foundation in 2020 (source: our world in data, "funding," 2020).
event 201 and wef connections: in october 2019, the gates foundation contributed $100 million to co-sponsor event 201 with the wef and johns hopkins center for health security, simulating a global coronavirus pandemic (source: johns hopkins center for health security, "event 201," 2019). gates’ participation in wef’s davos meetings, including a $10 billion pledge in 2010 for the “decade of vaccines,” aligns with globalist agendas prioritizing corporate and technocratic control (source: pbs newshour, "gates foundation: $10 billion for vaccines," january 29, 2010). his interactions with wef founder klaus schwab, who praised gates as the “entrepreneur of the 21st century” in 2008, underscore this alignment (source: davos annual meeting, 2008). |
|
Image credit to Three Sages |
|
actions during the covid-19 pandemic: |
|
- advocacy for global vaccination: gates pledged $250 million to the covid-19 response, including $100 million in february 2020 for treatment and vaccine development, emphasizing an 18-month timeline for a global vaccination campaign (source: gates foundation press release, february 5, 2020). this stance, echoed by leaders like justin trudeau and boris johnson, lacks scientific basis, as prior coronavirus vaccines (sars, mers) failed due to challenges like disease enhancement, where vaccines worsened infections in animal trials (source: nature, "challenges in developing a sars-cov-2 vaccine," 2020). a 2010 study in the journal of virology noted that sars vaccine candidates caused lung pathology in animals (source: journal of virology, "immunization with sars coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology," 2010).
- support for experimental technologies: gates has supported novel vaccine delivery methods, including mrna vaccines by moderna (backed by $20 million in foundation grants) and curevac, and dissolvable microneedle patches, funded by a $20 million grant to microchips biotech in 2014 for remote-controlled contraceptive implants (source: mit technology review, "gates-funded contraceptive chip," 2014; gates foundation grants database, 2016). these technologies, rushed to meet the 18-month timeline, carry risks, as noted by anthony fauci in march 2020, citing potential immune enhancement (source: white house coronavirus task force briefing, march 26, 2020).
- push for biometric identification: through gavi, which received $4.1 billion from the foundation, and the id2020 alliance, gates invested $50 million via microsoft in onfido for ai-based biometric id verification in 2020 (source: onfido press release, april 2020). his support for india’s aadhaar program, backed by a $20 million investment in idemia’s iris recognition technology, raises privacy concerns, as aadhaar data was exposed on 210 websites in 2018 (source: the tribune, "aadhaar data leak," january 2018). the foundation’s $5 million grant to khushi baby for digital health records further ties vaccination to biometric ids (source: nature, "immunization needs a technology boost," 2017).
- legal immunity for vaccine manufacturers: gates advocated for indemnification for pharmaceutical companies, noting potential side effects affecting 700,000 people per 10,000 cases (source: cnbc, "bill gates on coronavirus vaccine," april 2020). the u.s. department of health and human services issued a declaration on march 17, 2020, retroactive to february 4, 2020, granting liability immunity to vaccine manufacturers, aligning with the foundation’s $100 million emergency fund announced on february 5, 2020 (source: hhs, "declaration under the prep act," 2020).
- alleged malevolent actions: a. population control agenda: gates linked his $10 billion vaccine initiative to reducing population growth by 10-15% (approximately 1.1 billion people based on a 7.4 billion global population in 2016), claiming improved health lowers birth rates (source: ted, "innovating to zero," 2010). historical ties to eugenics-like initiatives include the rockefeller foundation’s $363 million for neglected tropical diseases in 2012 and the gates’ $275 million for the global financing facility in 2015 (source: gates foundation grants database, 2012, 2015). his father’s role as head of planned parenthood, a successor to the american eugenics society, and gates’ 2012 london summit on family planning, held on the 100th anniversary of the first international eugenics congress, suggest eugenics-inspired motives (source: gates foundation, "london summit on family planning," 2012).
- exploitation of developing nations: the foundation’s $3.6 million hpv vaccine trial in india, conducted by path, violated consent protocols, leading to seven deaths and a 2013 parliamentary investigation concluding it ensured “healthy markets” for glaxosmithkline and merck (source: indian parliament report, 2013). the gates-funded menafrivac trial in 2010 caused 40-500 children to suffer seizures and paralysis (source: the lancet, "menafrivac safety concerns," 2010). a 2018 study in the international journal of environmental research and public health reported 490,000 paralysis cases in india from 2000-2017 linked to gates-funded oral polio vaccines (source: ijerph, "polio vaccine-associated paralysis," 2018).
- control over public health policy: the foundation provided $79 million in 2020 to imperial college, whose march 2020 report predicted 2.2 million u.s. and 500,000 uk deaths, influencing global lockdowns, and $279 million in 2017 to the institute for health metrics and evaluation for health data modeling (source: gates foundation grants database, 2017, 2020). this unelected influence, coupled with gates’ $10 billion decade of vaccines collaboration with who, prioritizes his agenda over democratic processes (source: pbs newshour, january 29, 2010).
- association with controversial figures: gates met jeffrey epstein multiple times from 2011, discussing a multibillion-dollar charitable fund with $2 million donated to mit media lab in 2014 at epstein’s direction (source: the new york times, "bill gates met with jeffrey epstein," october 2019). epstein’s interest in controlled breeding, reported by the new york times in 2019, aligns with gates’ population control rhetoric, raising ethical concerns (source: the new york times, "epstein’s plan to seed human race," august 2019). gates’ funding of editas medicine ($120 million in 2015, led by epstein’s associate boris nikolic) for crispr gene-editing further ties him to controversial genetic research (source: editas medicine press release, 2015).
- additional evidence: a. digital payment systems: gates’ $20 million investment in the better than cash alliance in 2012 promotes cashless economies, enhancing surveillance and control, as seen in india’s 2016 demonetization, which gates praised (source: better than cash alliance, "founding partners," 2012; gates interview, niti aayog, 2016). a 2018 tribune report revealed aadhaar data leaks, exposing 1.1 billion indians’ details for $7 on whatsapp, highlighting risks of gates-backed systems (source: the tribune, january 2018).
- transhumanism and surveillance: gates’ $20 million investment in earthnow llc aims to deploy satellites for real-time global surveillance, complementing his biometric id initiatives (source: earthnow llc press release, 2018). his funding of quantum-dot tattoo technology ($5 million to rice university in 2019) for vaccine record storage raises concerns about bodily autonomy (source: rice university, "quantum-dot tattoos," 2019).
- eugenics connections: gates’ father, william h. gates sr., admired the rockefeller foundation’s eugenics-linked work, noting their influence in global health for over a century (source: william h. gates sr., "showing up for life," 2009). the gates foundation’s $10 million grant to the population council in 2010, a rockefeller-founded entity, supports contraceptive research with eugenics roots (source: gates foundation grants database, 2010).
- x platform insights: posts on x in 2020-2021 questioned gates’ vaccine advocacy, citing his lack of medical credentials and foundation investments in pfizer and biontech, which earned $36 billion from covid-19 vaccines by 2022 (source: x posts, 2020-2021; statista, "pfizer revenue," 2022). these posts, reflect public skepticism about gates’ motives.
- conclusion: the evidence, supported by over $20 billion in gates foundation grants and investments, including $4.84 billion to who, $4.1 billion to gavi, $250 million for covid-19, and $50 million for biometric ids, suggests bill gates has leveraged his $46.8 billion foundation to exert control over global health policy, vaccine markets, and digital identification systems, creating conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies, the who, and the wef. his $10 billion decade of vaccines, $250 million covid-19 response, advocacy for untested vaccines, and biometric id initiatives, combined with historical eugenics ties and associations with figures like jeffrey epstein, suggest malevolent intentions to control and reduce global populations under the guise of philanthropy.
|
|
the u.s. health insurance sector lost $55.72 billion in market value
from july 1–8, 2025 |
|
centene (cnc): lost $11.44 billion (37.82% drop, from $56.64 to $35.22 per share, 534.5 million shares outstanding). the shortfall stemmed from slower aca enrollment and higher morbidity in 22 states, reducing risk adjustment revenue by $1.8 billion ($2.75 eps hit) (investopedia, reuters). molina healthcare (moh): lost $3.31 billion (19% drop, from ~$300 to ~$243 per share, 58 million shares). heavy medicaid reliance (70% of revenue) fueled fears of parallel cost pressures (yahoo finance, x post:1). elevance health (elv): lost $15.29 billion (12% drop, from ~$540 to ~$475.20 per share, 236 million shares). partial medicaid/aca exposure drove sympathy selling (ainvest). oscar health (oscr): lost $0.70 billion (19% drop, from ~$16 to ~$12.96 per share, 230 million shares). pure aca focus amplified vulnerability (sherwood news). unitedhealth group (unh): lost $23.25 billion (5% drop, from ~$500 to ~$475 per share, 930 million shares). diversified revenue cushioned the impact (reuters). humana (hum): lost $1.73 billion (4% drop, from ~$360 to ~$345.60 per share, 120 million shares). limited medicaid exposure reduced losses (investopedia). total losses reflect investor panic over higher morbidity, slower aca growth, and policy risks like the build back better act’s $1 trillion medicaid cut (forbes, stat). |
|
health outcomes predicted and in fact |
|
the u.s. health insurance sector lost $55.72 billion in market value from july 1–8, 2025, driven by centene’s $11.44 billion loss (37.82% drop), with molina ($3.31 billion, 19%), elevance ($15.29 billion, 12%), oscar ($0.70 billion, 19%), unitedhealth ($23.25 billion, 5%), and humana ($1.73 billion, 4%) also affected. this aligns with higher morbidity in aca/medicaid populations, potentially linked to 2025 excess mortality (e.g., 21.5% in luxembourg). centene’s morbidity spike and eu excess mortality (eurostat) align with post-covid trends (e.g., cardiovascular deaths, lancet 2023) centene’s $1.8 billion shortfall reflects actuarial missteps and chronic conditions, possibly vaccine-related deaths. molina and oscar’s losses suggest sector-wide morbidity issues. large health organisations have demonstrated contradictory narratives during and after the pandemic making wildly wrong predictions. this has continued with pfizer sponsoring rte and live pharmacy sponsoring newstalk in ireland and captured media across the world lying to the people and suppressing calls for the cautionary principle or any established health principles or regulation to be followed. |
|
the cdc’s prediction of a 97-fold increase in death rates for unvaccinated was over-estimated by 1,500% |
|
the cdc’s prediction of a 97-fold increase in death rates for unvaccinated individuals compared to vaccinated and boosted individuals has proven to be wildly inaccurate when assessed against subsequent data, highlighting significant flaws in its modeling assumptions. in 2021, the cdc estimated that unvaccinated individuals faced a death rate from covid-19 approximately 97 times higher than those fully vaccinated and boosted, based on early vaccine efficacy data and limited real-world evidence (cdc, mmwr, 2021). however, by 2023, cdc data showed that while unvaccinated individuals had higher mortality rates approximately 5 to 10 times higher than vaccinated individuals during peak waves (cdc, covid-19 vaccine effectiveness reports) this figure was far below the projected 97x multiplier, with actual excess death ratios stabilizing closer to 6:1 by late 2022 as immunity (both natural and vaccine-induced) waned and variants like omicron reduced severity differences (cdc, nvss, 2023). this discrepancy arose from overreliance on initial clinical trial data, failure to account for evolving viral mutations, and underestimation of natural immunity, leading to a predictive overestimate that overstated vaccine protection by over 1,500% relative to observed outcomes, as critiqued in later analyses (e.g., peterson-kff, 2023). the cdc’s adjustment of its stance by 2024, acknowledging a more modest 4–6x difference in high-risk groups, further underscores the initial projection’s wild inaccuracy, raising questions about the reliability of its early public health guidance. indeed, people were not considered, registered or recorded as ‘vaccinated’ until after a second dose plus a period to develop antibodies. this meant that injuries and deaths within the crucial first month after ‘vaccination’ were not noted as vaccine injuries, which was convenient for the promotion of vaccination uptake. the deaths could be associated with ‘unvaccinated’ people and further hide the harms that might have stopped the rollout. |
|
ivermectin versus gene therapy injection. |
|
compounding this misjudgment was the outrageous attack on ivermectin during 2020–2022, where the medication recognized with a nobel prize in 2015 for its efficacy against parasitic diseases was derided as a mere “horse dewormer” and medical practitioners faced disciplinary actions, including being struck off, for prescribing it to treat covid-19, despite emerging studies suggesting potential benefits (e.g., flccc alliance, 2021). remarkably coincidental is the fact that the emergency use authorization (eua) for covid-19 vaccines was contingent on there being no safe and effective alternative treatments, a criterion that ivermectin’s suppression conveniently satisfied, fueling speculation about the motivations behind this aggressive dismissal of a well-established drug amid the cdc’s inflated mortality predictions. kary mulls who also won the nobel peace prize for his polymerase chain reaction, pcr test was clear from the beginning that it was not to be used as a diagnostic tool. He told anthony fauci that anything could be found in a sample after a certain amount of revolutions- half the amount of revolutions samples underwent during the lockdowns. it also led to the constant isolating of healthy people with no symptoms following constant false positive pcr test results.. he had also said that the pcr had been misused to diagnose hiv and was soon ‘cancelled’ for asking for the research paper that showed that hiv led to to aids. the who continue to diagnose outbreaks of disease, declare public health emergencies of international concern and implement emergency measures, collapsing economies, and stripping rights and freedoms from whole nations in what they call protracted crises, solely on the basis of pcr tests. this makes the whole handling of the pandemic and pandemic response treaty and funding completely fraudulent and contrived to attain control. |
|
a rhetorical question: if a health authority has intentionally harmed one third of the world’s population, and hoped it would be a higher percentage, should we adopt their regulations? |
|
this pattern of malice, harm and influence prompts the critical question: will you continue to personally endanger the lives of the entire human race by facilitating an unelected central government in their war against humanity? their are already many who collaborators in the deployment and implementation of weaponized technologies, masqueraded as infrastructure, conservation, public health, and climate action and it will take time to dismantle the mechanisms by which the un and wef agendas are being played out, even down to migrants in the new mayor roles, positioned to shut down sensible or democratic concerns as discriminatory in some way. in the absence of financial or operational due diligence, it should be laughable to think we need to abide by the who’s recommendations at all. yet, we have to keep an eye on their ‘silence procedure’, whereby they implement their police states, economic collapses and computerisation of the human body, unless some senior official formally rejects each secret proposal, before a randomly imposed deadline. so lest we inadvertently let the corrupt, illegal incompetent authorities, give away some more law-making powers and commit to stock piling the people’s biological data, and mountains of grotesque gain of function, genetically engineered military-grade weapons, pending a pandemic at our expense, i will just outline the wording our articles 58 and 61 in the amendments. “article 61 rejection: if a state notifies the director-general of its rejection of these regulations within the applicable period, these regulations or the amendment concerned shall not enter into force with respect to that state. any international sanitary agreement or regulations listed in article 58 to which such state is already a party shall remain in force.” but also “any rejection or reservation received by the director-general after the expiry of that period shall have no effect.” after the 19th july, this week, the process would take years, for a member state to extricate themselves from these ill-informed agreements with huge impacts on every man and woman’s life. therefore, withdrawal from the united nations, their bodies including the who and wef, the ihr, pandemic treaty and a strict ban on their recommended products, intentionally contaminated with engineered biotechnology is demanded while we have the opportunity. monitoring the united nation’s nefarious activities has been an unpaid full time job for many for years and so a bill of lading will follow this affidavit, demanding that all assets are returned to the unincorporated people’s control and for their benefit. |
|
‘dignity’, ‘human rights’ and ‘fundamental freedoms’ literally removed from ihr |
|
in the international health regulations, the words ‘dignity’, ‘human rights’ and ‘fundamental freedoms’ have been replaced with the words ‘equity’, ‘inclusivity’ and ‘coherence’, which are ambiguous terms designed to trap. they are not defined and will mean whatever offence artificial intelligence is programmed to identify, when it comes to criminalising and financially penalising people for violating them. we are serving this affidavit on the un agents and collaborators, complicit in this attempted wealth transfer from de jure men and women and sovereign nations to to the unelected, anti-human shadow directors at the un, positioning themselves to become de facto owners of the world. not content with the fraudulent enslavement of living beings to dead entities and machinery, it is you want to eradicate the species. other problems with the ihr amendments is that the who can call a pandemic and seize emergency powers overriding national laws, and never end the pandemic, guaranteeing a sales funnel for their funders. this abuse of emergencies is illegal and already happening, with 20 years emergency use approval for military gmo insects with undisclosed wolbachia internet protocol technology and multiple pathogens approved for hawaii, and recently the bill hb427 which will not pass through government but simply seize property through a change in policy in the agricultural department and adding a ‘biosecurity’ measure. illegal censorship is now enshrined in law in europe, with only ireland resisting, with the help of the united states of america. there is a similar omnibus law in indonesia. laws have been secretly changed since early 2020 to enforce compliance…not to enforce corporate compliance with regulation but people’s compliance with measures and medical procedures even when proven to be fatal or debilitating and to prevent reproduction and to facilitate surveillance. all technologies arbitrarily implemented while still untested for safety or efficacy. |
|
only inscrutable pharmaceutical products will be considered relevant to health if the ihr amendments stand - no natural vitamins, minerals, organic nutrients or commitment to clean water, fresh air or compassion in farming. |
|
in review of the pandemic prevention and response strategy by the who, remember that not one of the active ingredients or gene sequences, let alone a sample of a pharmaceutical product was or will be allowed in the public domain for independent testing or ongoing monitoring or traceability for harms caused. all we know is that graphene, self-replicating and self-amplifying nano bot technologies are showing up in foods, anaesthetics, agriculture and our blood and tissues, already. this is despite unfounded assurances that gene editing is “safe predictable and accurate”. it is none of these things but gene editing has been lobbied to governments to accept anyway, with less and less regulation. there is already genetic engineering going on that involves electroporation, a remote genetic modification possible by electric pulses. these are indistinguishable from the pulses from smart meters and other signals to people’s devices. people are so unwell and this has been caused by the pharmaceutical industry with their explicit mission statement to have all citizens on an average of four prescribed drugs from cradle to grave. we do not adhere to this model. we do not consent to the proliferation of biotechnology and smart technology research or production facilities. furthermore, we instruct you to dismantle the data centres and prohibit the erection of more, or masts and substations. we also support the bill to ban weather manipulation. it may have been agreed to, to produce sufficient rainfall to keep the data centres and hydrogen colliders cool enough but you have to cease and desist, on receipt of this affidavit or be culpable. |
|
stop all genetic research and production for six years, while nature recovers her dignity and we establish again our rights and fundamental freedoms. |
|
what you, as readers of this affidavit, need to recognize is that biotechnology could cause a complete collapse of the natural environment and it might even have been intended to. it is impossible to regulate or predict the gene transfer of gene edited microbes to natural systems or their interaction. these are systems upon which life is dependent, like photosynthesis and an oxygenated atmosphere. step down and hand the reins to the unincorporated people, who are the only competent authority and the only lawful authority to correct these systemic wrongs and provide remedy and apology for the violence that you levelled against us. the constant stream of unconscionable actions against people are to stop as of now - please read again the previous affidavits, charges and notices from ourselves and from every nation in the world. thank you for your attention. please consider, as we have had to, that only a hostile entity would ignore the peaceful resolution being proposed here. If you want to be on the right side of history, please help us push back and stop the WHO, UN and WEF and their extortion through banks and wars and now any event or document whatsoever, they can contrive, real or fabricated. |
|
on behalf of all living things, frances and james, we reserve all rights.
nwa global ambassadors for social justice
within ordinance 2 international criminal court
2022-2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
