Dear Paschal, 18th February 2022
Wifi Masts With No Due Diligence Done -
I am writing to you in a personal capacity, to say that I am holding you personally responsible and accountable for your oversight of, participation in, and contribution to the Connect group who have allowed new technology to inundate Ireland (Map attached), with no health or environmental research or independent health studies conducted or reviewed by different bodies here. There were no risk assessments, public health studies, or cautionary principle-staggering of implementation. This meant effects could not be monitored or the roll-out stopped if there were unforeseen adverse events (as documented in the "Resonance, Beings of Frequency" documentary at this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFR5EtO_zdM, which I would hope you are familiar with. Nor was there a control group established (wifi-free area and groups) for the experiment. I am disturbed by you selling Ireland to biological, military, chemical, nuclear and any other corporate entities capable of mass destruction, to test on Ireland on account of "Ireland's small population". I hardly dare mention the animal cruelty you have sanctioned in your sale of Ireland's soul to Foreign Direct Investment, making Ireland the Animal Testing Capital of Europe. Are we the people who you were elected to serve, not the lab animals now?
Our previous personal correspondence was when we proposed public banking for Ireland, replacing debt creation with a solid golden peg of Ireland's water resources, including seaweed and food security via subsistence organic farming. Banks to fund only businesses that improved waterways, reduced waste, encouraged biodiversity and supported local productivity would have attracted EU Green Deal money because of their biodiversity and sustainability directives. Indeed, with only a relatively small government investment, public banks could have bought the mortgage portfolio from the banks and legislated to limit house prices, going forwards. Within weeks of sending us the Indecon Report on Community Banking (again) which decided Ireland didn't need any bank services acting in the public interest, the newspaper reported that you and Leo Varadkar apparently held a meeting with a bank, with no other parties represented and apparently sold Ireland's water resources for 8 billion or so? To add insult to injury, we find that the new Irish Duty to be paid on every import post Brexit, does not go to even one of our pillar banks. It goes straight to Barclay's, a UK bank. Many people are aware as well of the heroic French MEP who called for Financial Services to pay a fraction on every transaction, as they were thriving in the new card payment economy, where every small business had to buy a machine to even open. He was on hunger strike for 21 days I understand and standing against your entire budgeting core group, to recoup some money for Member States, Social Services and Citizen Supports, from the private financial institutions including banks. Why did you not act in the public interest? Or maybe you will be asked, in what way have you acted in the public interest? I think it is important to consider these questions.
All this destruction of the social fabric, health, SME, housing and food security was carried out during the lockdowns of the pandemic, making it impossible to distinguish which health issues related to which contamination or stressor.
Now there is evidence mounting that the 5G technology can interact with the bodies of the people who have had the genetically engineered vaccines. I witnessed my own father's life turned off and on again 7 times over 24 hours before his final death. His health was destroyed after the Oxford vaccine - so called to appeal to the imagined authority of Oxford University, to suggest safety and rigorous research. This matches Ireland's own 'Garnering Public Consent For The Covid Vaccines' policy, which states that 1) people are "used to" vaccines and 2) they "trust doctors", so 3) they should be administered by GPs to encourage uptake. 4) The public should only be "told what they need to know"; ie. that it is a vaccine and recommended by their doctor. The sequence of injuries in my father's case were Reversed Myelitis; chronic fatigue with weakened bones, and inability to lift his legs. Then MDS or IPT which is a sort of anaemia; radical loss of red blood cells and inability for the bone marrow to make the new cells, but no shortage of iron, so previous treatments for anaemia could not be used, as they would add a heavy metals poisoning. There were over 800 cases of MDS in the UK. Doctors in Ireland are not helping patients record adverse events. Indeed they are hostile and deny any correlation regardless of how blatant. I don't know where the Hippocratic Oath went, starting 'Do no harm'. Now they have been actively recruited to push a narrative that is extremely profitable to pharmaceutical companies and justifies emergency measures and control by government.
As finance minister, you may have to explain your part in this, as GPs who had not seen sufficient scientific evidence to suggest safety, let alone efficacy and didn't want to inject their patients have either been struck off, if they spoke publicly, or had their medical card payments taken away. You must have passed and implemented that decision even though the minutes of every NPHET meeting that I have found on line, raised the same issue of there being no data to scrutinize or discuss before any of their decisions had to be made.
There is already a criminal case for misconduct in public office, gross negligence and manslaughter, that has been accepted by the International Criminal Court: Ref 6029679/21. I have an outline of the 12 points made in their response to claims from other Irish citizens, if you would like me to forward it.
A complaint of assisted suicide applies to the vaccine technology, NPHET and Europe's Gain of Function council (also based in Ireland), but the stronger complaint of manslaughter is founded for the infrastructure and turning on of 5G, as well as earlier electromagnetic Eirgrid, ESB and Broadband radiating infrastructure. And definitely a charge of Ecocide too. Maybe most of all, misuse of public money. You may have to explain how broadband came to be considered a green technology, or smart, and why it has been able to attract so much money, when it produces nothing, protects nothing and quite possibly controls and then destroys whatever life forms live in its proximity.
We have not consented via referendum to the satellites. We have not consented to the roll out of 5G. We have definitely not consented to the continual dropping of chemicals by aeroplane, throughout the last two years. in fact we have fought hard to stop them. There was a lot of opposition that was over-ridden. Co. Clare was one county who fought a hard legal battle to remain free of 5G, as we did here in Kilkenny. Currently the radiation is causing severe coughs in dogs and high adrenalin and compromised health. That is just one of the developments. More seriously people have been moved to suicide. Using energy weapons against us, which would include new wifi and nano technologies by definition, is against the law. That is even if there is no precedent, it could fit with the rest of the charges of crimes against humanity.
There was no chance of informed consent as no information has been circulated about the pros and cons of the new technology. The manufactured consent was achieved by coupling dangerous advances in technology with terms like 'Green Technology', 'Smart Farms', 'Health' and 'Wellness' and 'Connectivity'. And most appallingly, attaching Environmental objectives and Green Deal money to technology, when it works one hundred percent against nature. We did not consent to join NATO. We did not consent to the hazards nor military agenda (http://healingbyfranc.blogspot.com/2021/06/are-so-far-unpiloted-nuclear-modular.html) agreeing a nuclear energy pipe being built from France to Ireland, or the outdated renewable energy turbines that have been made and are to employ international companies to erect. You do not have informed consent for any of the heinous give-aways you have mounted against the Irish people and I hope that you are prepared to share your reasoning if you are ever asked in a court of law. In meat trade circles, it is known that you intentionally bring supplies through the UK so that Irish consumers will have to pay higher prices to cover 'importing' food supplies. Is it a coincidence that meat plants have been allowed to stay operational despite clusters and live export, which has also been rigorously opposed on welfare grounds, has been not only allowed to go ahead but Stena Line and Irish Ferries actively subsidized by the government throughout the last two years to facilitate them?
I take this opportunity to say that if you allow gene edited seeds unlabelled as GMO (merely because lobbyists argue no second species was added in the engineering) or you allow the genetic engineering of algae "for carbon capture", which could disturb the gene pool and with it our oxygen supply (draft article attached), there may be questions asked too, like why was it allowed and what made you think it was safe? I circulated, myself, in July 2021 a white paper about the dangers of genetically modified microbes - GMO 2.0s https://protectnaturenow.com/pdfviewer/gmm-executive-summary/.
In May 2020, I shared the article below following contacting 'Connect' to talk to their health and safety department to request information on what 5G studies, risk assessments were available and to offer to put a control group together at my own organic farm and include the many other locations from the Stop 5G contingent. I was told there were no medical doctors, let alone department committed to investigating the short/medium aor long term effects of wifi, of different strengths, the masts and the satellite deployment, or to offer a control group, not exposed to electromagnetic frequencies, and monitor the health, productivity and biodiversity of participants and their protected land.
Realizing we had to do this ourselves, I also applied to manage the National Biodiversity Data Centre in 2020 to recruit citizen scientists in all universities to conduct 'before and after' data around the multitude of short-range 5G masts, to make sure that there would be evidence to stop the rollout if it was killing the wildlife or contaminating/changing the structure of water/food or air. That tender submission was also circulated, so there is no excuse that you didn't know. Indeed, a lawyer in the above case has stated categorically that not knowing the dangers will not count as a defence in court.
You may think that you will never have to formulate an answer about the Covid 19 virus, in the context of the new technology. Some studies explain how viruses emerge from poisoning, rather than transmit like bacteria between people, and how the widespread die-off of our kind, as we have seen in the last two years, is directly connected to the introduction of dangerously unhealthy frequencies and toxins that degrade our ability to survive and care for each other. They draw a parallel with historical outbreaks and give evidence for a correlation with the new technologies of those times. How will you answer, if asked whether you were following the science or the money?
I was told about 5G, by one politician in writing, 'WHO says it's safe' but imagine if you were asked in court about any of the above points and you could not prove there were dangers you had intentionally overlooked. This is your responsibility, even if only in part.
The vaccines are the first drugs to ever come on the market, let alone be widely administered, where their active ingredients are not in the public domain. Even under Freedom Of Information requests, they were protected for ‘commercial reasons’. Gain of Function research results are guarded as a matter of national security, while their 'benefits to society' are simultaneously upheld as their main justification for permits and funding (https://protectnaturenow.com/pdfviewer/gain-of-function-research-full-report/
5G, bioengineered microbes, the active ingredients in vaccines and chemicals and high voltage technologies are all protected by GDPR for commercial reasons while crossing every indefensible boundary of our privacy and safety; even our DNA and bodily integrity. Moving us, unbeknownst to many, from human to transhuman and mainly sick and dying.
This all means that we cannot test drinking water to make sure we haven’t contaminated not only our blood but also the future health of all generations. And, of course, only the companies producing them can test for and vouch for their safety, while simultaneously profiting and all with no risk. It does not matter how you re-write the Consent Process for the Vaccination Programme, our right to maintain our Bodily Integrity must still be in the Constitution - if it is not, the point was not deleted following a referendum. We do not consent and those that have could not have informed consent.
Ignorance of what the adverse effects including death and ecosystem collapse will not reduce your liability. The international criminal court confirms in their final point that “If you believe you are a victim of crime and there is no evidence to the contrary a crime must be recorded.” It is virtually impossible to report an adverse reaction to the vaccines, let alone the dangers of living close to high voltage pylons. I have recorded both in my personal experience, as a citizen and as a legal advocate.
You may or may not know that only men and women can be held responsible; corporations and pharmaceutical companies, manufacturers and governments are until now beyond liability. You must know, don't you, that all the swine flu vaccine injury claims are having to be paid out at the moment and the HPV vaccine injury as well had to be paid by the State, as the manufacturers have some law supporting exemption? Please consider all these matters and how you would defend your actions of doing so much harm, with so little justification. I have lost family and friends to financial destitution suicide and vaccine injury, yet none to the pandemic. As those NPHET meeting minutes confirmed in their 'Matters Arising': There was no data circulated on which to make those decisions they made; to kill the livelihoods, muzzle us, allow the power grab of our food and water resources and ability to sustain ourselves or manage our own health, and coerce people into invasive and dangerous testing and medical procedures.
I am submitting this email and attachments, including my account of my father's death by vaccine injury as support for the case being brought. I am also cc'ing Irish politician Ben Gilroy who is calling for the apology and stepping down of the government, on behalf of the Irish people. He is also thankfully taking an environmental interest in the biosafety of engineering both vaccines and the Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) GMO's, such as Algae. Now we are moving on to Climate Change and weather modification, I ask one more time for you to stop the chemical trails and shut down the 5G infringement from masts and satellites. We do not want it, and we do not consent. Thank you Paschal Donohoe, for addressing these matters, in the spirit of public health and public service.
Yours sincerely,
Frances
No comments:
Post a Comment