Make your Comment here ASAP Thanks. Use my answers or sentences thereof if you want!
What do you think the main benefits will be, if any, for the government’s new national digital ID system?
It will be a vast and inexcusable expansion of the birth certificate fraud, by corporate government, the next unprecedented wealth extraction from the living population, as livestock for trade. So the benefits will only be to government, their shadow directors and the eugenicists Tony Blair's son who you gave the contract too to manage this data, despite his incompetence and lack of expertise in managing anything as his training company was in debt until his worth skyrocketed with sponsorship from Gates Musk, who will benefit inordinately from this data theft.
What do you think the main drawbacks will be, if any, for the government’s new national digital ID system?
The government has no right to surveil and track the people, claim their information. All the birds that were tracked in the Kingdom of Hawaii, with this digital interface died immediately. The frequency of the network is contrary to biological function/survival. You do not have consent and you intend to coerce the population again to accept this dangerous technology and bio-technology, without oversight or accountability. There will be no one and no way to correct breaches of private information, and mistakes People themselves will be shut out of their own lives, wrongly attributed criminal records, for normal activities that were not illegal the day before, will be impossible to take off the system. It will give public servants and private interests, an inappropriate and despicable remote power over the people that employ them to provide services.
We simply do not believe that the government aim to make it easier for people to prove who they are. Already there are two part verifications to authorising a payment, all dependent on technology. It is absurd to talk about easier when the biggest market it data. Governments have given all our intellectual property away already and ability to claim royalties or make a living. You have allowed the contamination of food and medicines with technology and this new market, using biological assets plays into the World Health Organisation's 'Pathogen Sharing and Benefits strategy', where diseases can be identified, rightly or wrongly, they must be disclosed, like Ragwort or other invasive species, if discovered, and dysfunctions will be created specifically to justify the roll out of whatever pharmaceutical companies and governments have a stock pile of. Consider the Post Office Scandal, where honest, competent men and women were held responsible for mistakes and glitches in a new technology that didn't work and people were bankrupted and their reputations and lives ruined.
The government proposes to use the digital ID system to enable more modern, efficient and personalised public services. Which public services would you want the government to prioritise making faster or more efficient using the system?
I think the clue is in the words 'public services'. Government should abandon digital ID, disable the foreign military technology and network, which has been erected across the country, with no planning permission and with fraudulent supporting studies from companies that were dissolved 15 years earlier and redirect the contract money to the services, paying people to provide for each other. The digital ID will only be efficient in hiding the accountability of service providers as people will never be able to prove what happened, and how we were treated and what money we had in our accounts, what doctors advised us to take, what lawyers and court systems took from our estates and evidence they took as verbatim, without any truth testing possible.
The national digital ID will be issued as a credential (or digital document) for storage on a compatible device, similar to how people already store payment cards and tickets on their smartphones. Are there technical issuance standards, beyond those already used by the GOV.UK Wallet, that we should be building the national digital ID to?
Yes
Please explain your answer and provide examples of the technical standards that should be used.
Institute For Responsible Technology would tell you in a heart beat. The government lie as to the objective of the digital ID is at the heart of the problem for building it and regulating it. There has been no interest shown to date, in rigorous standards or debate in regard to safety or efficiency. Look at the mobile phone and wifi mast safety studies. There has been only one done, 30 years ago that showed that exposure to wifi for 15 minutes created an adrenalin emergency response for 10 constant days. That study was buried and old and young carry phones now that are disrupting their ability to grow, think, recover, breathe and other functions. Government's unfounded and assumed right to 'create legislation' and cherry pick 'technical standards', while simultaneously indemnifying all corporations from adhering to regulations, let alone compensating people for damages and deaths, combine to make this government's most sinister project yet. Government has already put into legislation in April 2020 that digital health records and refusal to take experimental technology into their body, can serve as offences that can lead to inprisonment and seizure of property. The government plan is one hundred percent against the law and against international law, and the Nuremburg Code, and we reject digital ID in its entirety.
Do you think one area will be more affected than another? Yes, England.
I use the example of farmers to describe the impact of government's changing policies and positive discrimination. Government bodies and the industry giants that direct them, like Glasgow Finance for Net Zero, change each year and fund the uptake of different agricultural biotechnologies and chemicals and systems in Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, England etc. There is no continuity of funding and no saying whether what is done this year may be against new legislation brought in next year. People will be penalised, The farmer's unions say that England is being particularly targeted with these changing goal posts and with digital ID, government will not need to justify any decision just implement it. Only a few years ago, there was a policy of a 'just transition' towards the biodiversity objectives. Now you want to regulate people and deregulate the destructive corporations, for your profit.
In Malaysia, the CBDC digital currency, closely related to proving who they were by digital ID, 80 million bank accounts and all that was in them were lost. The government has weaponised the remaining values of the population, and is intentionally setting groups against each other on every pretext and ideology.In Indonesia, over a million votes were not accepted, even with a wet ink signature because of reliance on digital ID, clearly set to reject votes from people voting for the candidate the government did not want. The ID will exacerbate all these things.
Are there any ethical factors government should consider that relate to an individual deleting their digital ID?
The government cannot guarantee the safety of our data. The government has already enlisted foreign technology by an international group who have made their fortunes by selling data and conducting 'gains of function' to interface, with the human body, designing and selling the devices that will store the information, essentially recording man, woman and child's movements in real time, and giving them and the government an opportunity to block interactions, purchases, movements, however urgent, for whatever reason, from the central control, manned only by artificial intelligence, programmed for an undisclosed objective.
Are there any ethical factors government should consider that relate to revoking (i.e. cancelling) an individual’s digital ID?
It is one thing cancelling people's platforms for expression, like Facebook, but cancelling someone's ID is known to be 100% disempowering in every sense of the word. Consider all the displaced people from wars and drought, who have not been able to bring their passports or do not have one. People will not be able to live, if you claim the arbitrary power to dismantle their ability to access their independent means. Government has no 'robust' processes. The food, medicines, education, politics, everything is intentionally corrupted in order to position governments to implement a nanny state, and then a police state. It is a lie to call it an application for a digital ID, when you know very well that companies, insurance, loans, funding and job applications will all start to require the ID, under the heading One ID or something that sounds reasonable but is inextricable. Even if you do cancel someone's ID or a man or woman deletes their own, the result is the same, that all their information is still in circulation and on record, with massive unconscionable impacts. All of which government politicians know so personal liability must be considered and please consider stopping the ID before it is too late.
Do you think people should be able to choose to store their national digital ID directly in holder services (sometimes known as ‘digital wallets’) other than the GOV.UK Wallet, that are certified to meet government standards?
The use of the word choose is interesting as of course there will be no choice who the government shares our data with. Your use of the word digital wallet, gives away your plan to tie the digital ID to the banks and control our finances and ability to trade which is against the law, the UPU guarantees the people an even and fair ability to conduct business across the entire postal territory. It is also sinister, to encourage people to carry their identity as if it is a wallet, when you are re-financing, re-monetizing us, as livestock, completely trapped, surveilled and enslaved to the extent that everything we do, create, earn is immediately harvested by the government and paid off our alleged debts. It is really quite sick and may you be forgiven.
To support secure use, there needs to be a robust way to check the national digital ID presented from the GOV.UK Wallet. This will help confirm it has not been faked, tampered with or revoked. The private sector has already developed free and paid-for checking services. In addition, we are considering creating a ‘government checker’ service. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the proposed government checker service being made available for use in the private and third sectors, at low or no cost?
Strongly disagree
Your use of the words faked, tampered with or revoked shows that government is not acknowledging the situation already, which is that only the internet itself and the artificial intelligence - upon which the Digital ID would depend - are capable of faking, tampering, and revoking anything. The people, the lives of other species and all value and energy generated through human endeavour will still be people and the government will still be our employees. How can you possible leave it to technology to decide who we are?We do not consent to the digital ID or any further military infrastructure for corporate profit and control. You say the private sector has already developed free and paid-for checking services and now you pretend to ask us if we approve a government checking service. This is clearly a private sector business plan which the government has already approved but wants to get in on. Who is the ID for if it's not for the government? One question is, have you already approved the insertion of a digital ID, via bluetooth, smuggled in to many of the population through mRNA shots, as many studies are starting to show.
We are considering several limitations to the government checker service, by design. For instance, it could only be able to check government-issued credentials, like the national digital ID. This is intended to leave room for third-party checking services. Are there any specific limitations you think we should set for the government checker?
Yes
A specific limitation would be abandoning the digital ID which has been rejected in the public court of opinion and ending the birth certificate and bank fraud simultaneously. Like an amnesty, where there is an opportunity to lay down arms the government should make a statement, a mea culpa, that acknowledges that people have been exploited and have undergone intended education to make them believe there is no credit side to the ledger, only debt, regardless of all enterprise. And make a promise to facilitate restorative justice. Anything less than that, and any imposed or 'offered' digital ID, checked by whoever, whenever would bring a social credit score tyranny and conflicts of interest that would decimate the lives of the people, you are supposed to serve.
We know that people can struggle to access or claim the public services to which they are entitled. We want to identify key issues in these interactions, so that we can explore how the digital ID system could help address these, making people’s lives easier. When people are interacting with public services, some common issues could be:
- Signposting – people might not know what public services are available to them
- Privacy concerns – people might be concerned about who information about their situation will be shared with
- Time and effort – people might not find the time to complete the processes needed to access public services they are entitled to
- Proving their identity/eligibility – people might not have access to the required letters, documents, or reference numbers needed to check their eligibility for, or to, access public services
For those who opt for a digital ID, government would develop a method to securely identify and match people across different public services to simplify everyday interactions between individuals and the state.
For instance, such an approach could help ensure changes in an individual’s information are easily and quickly reflected across services, like a name change. This would reduce the need for people to update their information separately for each service. It could also let government move away from old-fashioned and bureaucratic processes, towards proactive, hassle-free services that are available at the point of need.
To most effectively respond to this consultation, we strongly advise you to read all of Chapter 4.5: Alternative Access Routes.
However, we have included a summary of this Chapter below.
To ensure everyone eligible can access the national digital ID, the government is exploring how the digital ID could be accessed in a safe, accessible way without using a device. Any alternative access route must be digitally checkable, meet the same high standards of security and be robust against fraud. Other countries with digital ID systems in place provide alternative access routes, such as a physical card with a machine-readable smart chip containing the person’s ID data. We will consider a range of approaches and are seeking views on which alternative routes would work best in the UK context.
As a reminder: please do not include information that could identify a specific individual in any free text responses.
