Cases to Appeal 9-25
9. Hawaii Unites - 20 years of GMO insects, no monitoring and no environmental impact report
10. Singapore accidental 3 female GM Mosquitoes replace a whole population (Gene Drive)
11. 2008 Indonesia Refuses Material Transfer of Viruses (now called pathogen-sharing)
12 Bill Bates versus the US - Manufactures consent in developing countries by funding universities.
13. Elon Musk, 180-day experimental permit to radiate people and deliver genetic modifications using electrical-pulses, plus data collection without consent.
14. George Soros vs France. Insider trading and alleged responsibility for forced migration.
15. Central bank challenge for printing bank notes using pigs blood, and losing the ‘Right to Rescue’ animals in court.
16. AUKUS nuclear partnership and UN’s
17. WEF’s Pascal Najadi case: Filed charges against the President, to remove diplomatic immunity for WEF & WHO, for Covid Crimes.
18. Director of the New York Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Craig Mokhibe Resignation Letter - the UN is party to Genocide 19. Estonia’s Parliament reject the WHO
20. Ireland’s Crotty vs the government - Won the case that there should be no International Agreements without a Referendum
21 Stopping AI because of its always-active military protocols: Deployment & Retaliation
22. Vaccine Deaths and Warnings: Pfizer Found Guilty in UK Cases
23. South African Contracts - Pfizer payment Guarantee Required, including natural resources, reserve banks and military bases.
24. Concealment of Data Case: Thailand
25. Private .. Banking is illegal and CBDCs are a tool of surveillance, control and continued fraudulent debt enslavement. Professor Richard Werner International Public Banking Alliance
9. HAWAII UNITES, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation; Tina Lia, an individual,
Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF HAWAI‘I, and DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF HAWAI‘I,
Contesting the deployment of military biotechnologies on an experimental and emergency permit, on the pretext of ‘conservation. Court proceedings to stop 775,992,000 biopesticide lab-reared Wolbachia-bacteria-infected mosquitoes per week. 807 billion over 20 years, still on an emergency permit; with no Environmental Impact Assessment, in the fragile ecosystems of East Maui.
Plaintiff Lia, on behalf of Hawaii Unites, verbally requested a contested case hearing for agenda item C-2 “Request Approval of Final Environmental Assessment and Authorization for the Chairperson to Issue a Finding of No Significant Impact for the ‘Suppression of Invasive Mosquito populations to Reduce Transmission of Avian Malaria to Threatened and Endangered Forest Birds on East Maui’”
On March 13, 2023, Plaintiff Lia filed a complaint on behalf of Hawaii Unites with the State of Hawai‘i Office of the Ombudsman, requesting an investigation into the BLNR for interference with the public’s ability to testify at the BLNR meeting on March 10, 2023. Per Tina Lia’s complaint, the BLNR Secretary emailed incorrect and inoperative information for providing video testimony at the meeting. The BLNR then rearranged the agenda items at the March 10, 2023, meeting in random order with no explanation to the public waiting to testify. Testifiers for the biopesticide mosquito project agenda item were made to sit through the entire eight-hour meeting, reduce their testimony from three minutes to two minutes each, and listen to the BLNR members joking and laughing about the postponement of the biopesticide mosquito project agenda item.
Hawaii Unites has repeatedly presented documented, compelling evidence of the risks and impacts of the biopesticide mosquito project to the BLNR. Rather than acknowledge and address the organization’s concerns, the BLNR has acted in a consistently dismissive and disruptive manner towards this testimony. The rights of Hawaii Unites, of the organization’s supporters, and of the public, to open governmental processes have been infringed upon by the BLNR in their effort to silence discussion about the risks and impacts of the project.
Hawaii Unites dispute that BLNR’s powers include the authority to “adopt rules”; “appoint hearing officers to conduct public hearings”; bring enforcement actions; and establish “restrictions, requirements, or conditions ...relating to the use of particular land being disposed of, the terms of sale, lease, license, or permit, and the qualifications of any person to draw, bid, or negotiate for public land. “Land” is defined to include “all interests therein and natural resources including water.” https://hawaiiunites.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2023/05/2023_0508_Hawaii_Unites_and_Lia_v_BLNR_and_DLNR.pdf Hawaii’s Health Minister is the only Health Minister in the World who has taken a stand against the weaponisation of health. He will give evidence again in the Appeal, but as a private citizen.
10. Singapore World Mosquito Program release only males but allow for a tiny percentage of the breeding biting females to be released. In Indonesia and Sri Lanka, the World Mosquito Program had developed their business plan to allow for a female bias - which meant that the majority of lab-born mosquitoes were born female as the males were sterile. They created false promotional material to suggest that both males and female eggs should be deployed.
The Singapore study showed that about 3 female mosquitoes accidentally released caused “total population replacement”: By definition that is a ‘gene drive’ which is a technology so dangerous that over 300,000 people and groups signed a petition for a moratorium on even gene drive research. Gene drives have never been approved for open air release, but the defendants and their agents
“Wolbachia-mediated sterility suppresses Aedes aegypti populations in the urban tropics” – The Project Wolbachia – Singapore Consortium, Ng Lee Ching
"In Tampines, where pipeline-sorted wAlbB-SG males were released, we detected wAlbB-positive adult females sporadically and at lower frequencies than in Yishun (Fig. 6B). From May 2020 onwards, however, following a year of very low wildtype Aedes aegypti population, we observed a steady increase in wAlbB-positive adult females caught (Fig. 6B) in the Tampines core, along with a rebound in the wildtype Aedes aegypti population in the same area. This suggests that even with high-
fidelity sorting, inadvertent release of a few fertile females can lead to stable establishment of Wolbachia in the field, given the lack of competition from the nearly eliminated wildtype population.”
"Our data further show that when the wildtype mosquito population is suppressed to very low levels—possibly close to elimination, as in the Tampines core—release of even a few fertile wAlbB-SG females could result in establishment of wAlbB in the field population. This threshold may be as low as three individuals, the minimum number of wAlbB-SG females we believe were released in the Tampines core during Phase 2.”
11. Indonesia’s Siti Fadilah Supari is the only one who has ever got a military laboratory shut down, who has refused to share potential pandemic pathogen samples with the WHO on biosafety grounds. Indonesia The AS NAMRU-2 Biolab that Siti Fadilah, the Minister of Health who was Imprisoned, was fighting against.
Photo of Biolab AS NAMRU-2 which was opposed by Siti Fadilah, the Minister of Health who was imprisoned.
As Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia she announced that Indonesia would no longer provide bird flu viruses to the World Health Organization
The defendant in the medical equipment corruption case Siti Fadilah Supari discusses with legal advisors during a break in the follow-up trial at the Corruption Court, Jakarta, Wednesday, June 7 2018. (Antara/ Puspa Perwitasari)
The United States Navy (US Navy) has the Naval Medical Research Unit Detachment-2 (Medical Research Unit Two/NAMRU-2).This is the Navy's biomedical research laboratory, which was established with the aim of studying infectious diseases that have potential importance from a defense perspective in Asia.NAMRU-2 is officially registered under the US Naval Medical Research Center Command, located in Silver Spring, State of Maryland, and is considered the center of a network of laboratories located in various locations around the world.NAMRU-2 operates in several countries in Southeast Asia, including Vietnam, Laos, Singapore, the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia and Cambodia.Specifically in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, NAMRU-2 was
opened, equipped and operated as a satellite laboratory to conduct research on possible infectious disease outbreaks on a regional scale, with support from the Singapore Embassy's Defense Cooperation office.Meanwhile, other laboratory locations include Peru, Kenya and Egypt. Meanwhile, NAMRU-2, which previously operated in Indonesia, was relocated to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii and officially opened as NAMRU-2 Pacific on June 17 2010, and closed in 2013.
History of NAMRU
NAMRU-2 was initiated in Guam during World War II and operated under the Rockefeller Foundation. Its primary function when founded, was to study infectious diseases, which had potential importance in military considerations in Asia. This unit was then founded in 1955 in Taipei, Taiwan, and operated for 24 years. In 1958, a classic cholera epidemic broke out in Bangkok, Thailand, for the first time in ten years. NAMRU 2 responded to the Taiwanese Government's request for assistance. Then, annual research appeared in Thailand for several years, plus the El Tor type of cholera, which appeared in 1961 in Sulawesi.This outbreak became the 7th pandemic, which quickly became the center of attention of the NAMRU-2 agenda, along with how to overcome it.In 1968, reported by Suara Pemberda from Wikipedia , the Indonesian Ministry of Health discussed starting a separate unit in Jakarta, Indonesia. This request from the Indonesian Ministry of Health was motivated by the disease that hit Boyolali Regency, namely in Selo District and Cepogo District, where 101 people fell ill, and 42 of them died with a case fatality rate (CFR] of 42 percent. This unit was then established in 1970 at the official invitation of representatives of the Indonesian Ministry of Health to investigate infectious diseases of significance to both the US Navy, and the US Department of Defense. In 1979, as a result of the recognition of the sovereignty of the People's Republic of China by the US, NAMRU-2 was asked to leave Taiwan, and move to Manila, Philippines.In 1990, due to political turmoil in the Philippines and potential threats to US personnel, the US deemed it prudent to house this command center, as there was a desire to reduce the US presence in Manila.The US Navy then began negotiating the parent unit's move to Jakarta, and discussions began between the US Department of State and the Indonesian Government.The main unit then officially moved to Jakarta in 1991, and the unit in Manila was closed in June 1994.After that, NAMRU-2 also began to formulate ways to handle
infectious disease threats for US military personnel, who were dispatched to Laos, Vietnam and Cambodia. Joint research projects were initiated with local authorities in these countries. Then, the World Health Organization (WHO) appointed NAMRU-2 as a collaboration center for new diseases for Southeast Asia.In 2002, activities in Phnom Penh were initiated by NAMRU-2, with the aim of research into regional infectious diseases, and laboratory support to diagnose them.This operation was performed from a laboratory located at the National Institute of Public Health in Pnom Penh, Cambodia. In 2007, with the priority of responding to global infectious disease threats, NAMRU-2 began carrying out separate unit preparation steps in Pnom Penh with the support of the Singapore Embassy's Office of Defense Cooperation.The main and central laboratory of NAMRU-2 was in Jakarta until 2010, when the request was closed by the Indonesian Government.Later, the central element of this unit was moved to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii and officially opened as NAMRU-2 Pacific on June 17, 2010, and closed in 2013.
Collaboration for NAMRU-2 with Indonesia
The NAMRU-2 unit in Jakarta, Indonesia, began 'playing' in 1968, between the Indonesian Ministry of Health and the US, as a separate unit from the facility in Taipei, Taiwan. This unit was then officially established in 1970 at the official invitation of representatives of the Indonesian Ministry of Health.Following political turmoil in Manila, the parent unit officially moved to Jakarta in 1991, and the Manila unit was closed in June 1994.NAMRU-2 Jakarta occupies an area of 5,670 meters, which consists of laboratories. The storage area is in three complex buildings of the Indonesian Ministry of Health (Badan LITBANGKES).The facility also features animal storage facilities, which are accredited by the American Association for the Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC).It also includes a 220 square meter BL3 laboratory that was moved from its previous location in Korea.Apart from the facilities in Jakarta, another facility which is quite modern and complete is the 418 square meter research facility in Jayapura, Irian Jaya.The NAMRU-2 staff consists of 175 Indonesian employees and 19 US employees.In 2001, a book entitled Program Evaluation: Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: a program review was published in Washington DC, USA. This book reviews the many programs carried out
by NAMRU-2 in Indonesia, including its collaboration with WHO. Among other things, influenza disease surveillance efforts in Indonesia are considered weak, because there are many uses in nasopharyngeal specimen sampling techniques .Therefore, it was considered that it would be better if this sample was carried out at an international level. The evaluation results also stated that samples sent to several places, including Australia, had a low level of coordination for reporting back.Tuberculosis (TB) surveillance in Indonesia is also assessed: Many TB cases are undiagnosed throughout the country. Laboratories in Indonesia are not equipped with the ability to diagnose and monitor germ resistance to the drugs administered, thereby threatening the population of US citizens living in Indonesia.HIV cases are starting to appear, and it is feared that if the HIV virus starts to associate with TB germs, TB cases will increase drastically. NAMRU-2 also faces resource challenges, with requests for training from the Indonesian Ministry of Health for various matters.Among the research requested to be carried out at universities in Indonesia, the problem is that research results from universities in Indonesia do not have a direct channel, which could have an impact on health management in Indonesia.In 2005, bird flu became a serious health problem for the world, and Indonesia was worst affected with 141 cases and 115 deaths.Indonesian Minister of Health Dr Siti Fadilah Supari initially complied with WHO regulations and followed all the rules.One of the vaccines, Prototype, was later developed by the Australian company CSL and supported by the Australian Government.Efforts to make this vaccine are aimed at protecting medical workers, if an outbreak occurs.But then, former Australian Health Minister Tony Abbott gave a media statement that the vaccine would only be available to Australian citizens.Although this was later denied by Robert McClelland from the Labor Party, that the party's policy of sharing the CSL vaccine with Indonesia and other countries in Southeast Asia was to spread this disease.However, this then triggered a cessation of sending samples of the bird flu virus from Indonesia to the rest of the world.
In the same year, 2007, Siti as Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia announced that Indonesia would no longer provide bird flu viruses to the World Health Organization (WHO) through the Influenza Monitoring Network Division (GISN). According to Siti, GISN does not
pay attention to the needs and interests of developing countries. Siti also argued that WHO had violated its own regulations in that the virus was transferred using double standards, received from countries affected by the virus through GISN, and handed over to commercial companies for vaccine development. Then, these vaccines became very expensive and available in countries affected by the virus, while rich industrial countries were busy using them just in case the outbreak hit. This statement was later recorded with the title It's Time for the World to Change .In her book, Siti revealed that since 1952, as many as 110 countries with flu cases have been obliged to share virus specimens without conditions. These viruses are collected by GISN, become their property, and by experts, then carry out risk considerations and research, and another side, namely making virus seeds which are then made into vaccines.Viruses that are classified as malignant are then announced at the WHO Collaborating Centers (WHO-CCs), which are laboratories that collaborate with WHO, and become reference laboratories. These reference laboratories are approved by Australia, Japan, UK and US.Then, this vaccine was then compared to oil, where he expressed his frustration that because Indonesia could not process crude oil it had to adopt ready-to-use oil.
Dangerous when Shipped to the USHis book also reviews the possibility of these viruses being developed into biological weapons, when they were sent to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA.This is because only a handful of scientists are allowed to research these derived DNA viruses.According to his book, Los Alamos is a laboratory for biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, so making vaccines or chemical weapons depends on the will and interest of the US Government.This is considered very dangerous. An internet search by Siti then revealed that this laboratory had been closed, and the virus had been sent to Bio Health Security (BHS).The results of his investigation revealed that many scientists were transferred from Los Alamos to BHS.So, his theory regarding the game of biological and chemical weapons, is still correct, then the name and location have changed.Negotiations were then initiated by Indonesia at the World Health Assembly (WHA) , which demanded a fair and transparent transfer of viruses. This effort is supported by many other countries that are members of WHO. There are two main things that Siti takes issue
with: Non-transparent distribution channels for sending viruses where she proposes standardizing naming and licensing from countries that have the virus to other countries where the virus is sent. WHO also considers WHO's pandemic warning escalation indicators to be weak and must be reviewed together. Escalating pandemic warnings affecting visits to the country, medical supplies, vaccines, masks, safety suits, all of which are big business.Siti gave the example of Mexico which is currently in a difficult position, but at the same time benefits large companies.However, this meeting was short because Minister Fadila was asked to return to Indonesia due to the outbreak, and many important discussions did not take place.Indonesia then began sending more samples of the virus based on international countries' conventions, that the Indonesian H5N1 bird flu virus is very dangerous for humans.Therefore, it is considered that it is very important to have a laboratory that has the opportunity to analyze it in detail, compare it with viruses similar to other worlds, and protect Indonesia and other countries from its spread.This was also questioned at the World Health Meeting , even though Indonesia has its own geographical area, and the spread of disease does not see national boundaries.US observer Scott McPherson, who is a US Government consultant, businessman and disaster preparation and recovery expert, stated in his blog that this issue was considered 'unreasonable' by the Indonesian Ministry of Health. Scott also reminded that Indonesia did not show any gratitude at all for what the US had done in Tangerang in eradicating Bird Flu in 2008. In addition, the communication of the bird flu virus does not need to be weaponized by humans to spread, because the birds themselves already do this. Meanwhile, another observer, Debora MacKenzie, a contributor to New Scientist , stated in her blog that Siti Fadilah's stance on the transparency of virus transfer was reasonable. Therefore, WHO responded with the development of a virus system, which went everywhere in the security system and scientific world. Total retaliation.
Discussions are also starting to be opened to discuss better procedures for sharing results.Meanwhile, biological weapons are a wrong conclusion. Debra added that between the two options of biological weapons or vaccines for profit, the second one actually shows the more likely scenario.US aid funds and NAMRU-2 Diplomatic Staff ImmunityIn October 2005, during his visit to Asian countries, the US Minister of
Health and Human Services, Mike Leavitt, stated that he had allocated funds amounting to 3.15 million US dollars to help deal with bird flu cases in Indonesia.The total assistance received by Indonesia was 25 million US dollars as initial assistance.The Japanese government also sent a team of experts, three diagnostic laboratory experts, who will start working and coordinate with the Indonesian Ministry of Health.Meanwhile, the Australian Government handed over 50 thousand Tamiflu, an anti-influenza virus drug produced by PT Roche and confirmed by the International Health Organization (WHO). Australia also stated that it would increase its assistance by 10 million Australian dollars to combat the threat of bird flu in Indonesia, as stated by Foreign Minister Alexander Downer in front of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono at that time.Thus, the aid package to Indonesia to deal with bird flu will be 15.5 million Australian dollars. This is because they had previously promised aid of five million Australian dollars.However, according to Siti in her book, It's Time For The World To Change, Indonesia has never seen any related aid money from the US Government.During US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's visit to Indonesia in 2006, Siti asked where the aid funds used by the US were, which according to Siti, could be used for referral hospitals. Siti then realized that US aid had been given to NAMRU-2, arguing that this laboratory was conducting H5N1 research, and had coordinated with the Ministry of Health, and employed 175 employees, of which 19 were US citizens.In April 2008, a telegram sent by the US Embassy Jakarta to Washington, which was leaked by the Wikileaks website, reported on developments, in which there was news announcing that the Indonesian Government had closed NAMRU-2.The US Embassy in Jakarta is aware of this closure, and requested that Washington respond to the MoU that was sent, so that talks can continue.The decision whether to close NAMRU-2 or not was postponed in June 2008, because the Indonesian side had a different opinion. The Indonesian government, including representatives of political parties in the government, is divided between wanting to maintain and close it.Meanwhile, Indonesian Health Minister Siti Fadilah in her speech at the Namru-2 US Army Laboratory dialogue in the heart of Jakarta, where is the TNI in the same month, asked for people's support to close NAMRU-2. Sentences such as 'expelled, useless', and 'colonized', are used in the argument. Negotiations from the US side continued to demand demands because their staff while the
Indonesian side refused to send virus samples.
In October 2008, Siti refused (again) to send virus samples to NAMRU-2 due to the issue of foreign intelligence, and the request that the US comply with Indonesia regarding the Material Transfer Agreement (virus). The accusation of intelligence activity was denied by the US Ambassador to Indonesia Cameron Hume, stating that everything that happened at NAMRU-2 was transparent. All research projects have been approved by the Ministry of Health, and the Indonesian Government has access to research being undertaken, so this accusation of non-transparency is strange. Hume also asked Indonesia to separate the issue of NAMRU-2 and the Material Transfer Agreement (virus) or also known as the Material Transfer Agreement, because these are two different things.In her best-selling book, It's time for the world to change, Dr. Siti Fadilah Supari wrote that after the H5N1 bird flu outbreak, which at one point was discovered in Indonesia.He also objected to the practice of mandatory local spread of the virus. samples with WHO-affiliated structures, which he said were not transparent and fair.Siti is not only concerned that the samples might end up in the hands of those responsible for making weapons of mass destruction.But also the fact that the vaccines produced by large pharmaceutical companies that use these samples will later be sold back to the country of origin of the specimens for profit.
12. Bill Gates Monopoly Precedent: 2003 Sued by the USA. Have laundered their money and agenda through philanthropies and genetic engineering, through developing countries.
The 14 Grand Challenges in Global Health:
Improve childhood vaccines:
Create effective single-dose vaccines that can be used soon after birth. Prepare vaccines that do not require refrigeration.
Develop needle-free delivery systems for vaccines.
Create new vaccines:
Devise reliable tests in model systems to evaluate live attenuated vaccines.
Solve how to design antigens for effective, protective immunity.
Learn which immunological responses provide protective immunity. Control insects that transmit agents of disease:
Develop a genetic strategy to deplete or incapacitate a disease- transmitting insect population.
Develop a chemical strategy to deplete or incapacitate a disease- transmitting insect population.
Improve nutrition to promote health:
Create a full range of optimal, bioavailable nutrients in a single staple plant species.
Improve drug treatment of infectious diseases:
Discover drugs and delivery systems that minimize the likelihood of drug resistant micro-organisms.
Cure latent and chronic infections:
Create therapies that can cure latent infections.
Create immunological methods that can cure chronic infections. Measure disease and health status accurately and economically in developing countries:
Develop technologies that permit quantitative assessment of population health status.
Develop technologies that allow assessment of individuals for multiple conditions or pathogens at point-of-care.
The mission statement to have all citizens on an average of 4 prescribed drugs from cradle to grave.
13. Elon Musk’s proliferation of radiological seasons of mass destruction.
It was just revealed that Elon Musk’s company Twitter/X has been profiting off of user data by selling it to the government for mass surveillance.1
This is exactly the type of warrantless government surveillance we’re trying to stop in the fight over Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is expected on the House Floor next week. Musk shouldn’t be allowed to sell user data to the government for surveillance AND the government shouldn’t be allowed to surveil without a warrant.
Congress must overhaul government spying powers immediately — and votes are imminent that will decide whether lawmakers will rubber-stamp mass surveillance on a UN/WHO directive.
Urge lawmakers before they vote — end mass surveillance, no more
warrantless spying on Americans!
The spying powers in Section 702 are abused by the government to spy on Americans (collecting, using, and sharing our personal data, including online communications) without a warrant. And Elon Musk shouldn’t be profiting off of our data and government surveillance.
Section 702 has been abused in ways that violate fundamental civil liberties and civil rights. FBI agents have abused this authority to search through millions of acquired communications for conversations, including thousands of protestors, racial justice activists, journalists, donors to political campaigns, and countless others. Meanwhile, more and more law enforcement and intelligence agencies are bypassing privacy rights by purchasing our sensitive location and online information from data brokers. Even though the Fourth Amendment protects our right to keep our information private, the government is collecting troves of our data without a warrant with the help of Elon Musk.
Votes on Section 702 are imminent – join us and take action now.
14.
Peace and reconciliation is possible. There are 130 million forcibly displaced people in the world. It was 70 million ten years ago. This is all United Nations-orchestrated instability, with their American shadow directors.
The charges against George Soros in regard to the migrant and refugee crises and trafficking have remained only legendary, without being upheld in courts. But this Appeal must address the causes and assign liability and the decommissioning of the corporate machines that facilitate them. The wars would stop instantly, if the Federal Supreme Court decides to empower men and women by law in our mass conscientious objection to the violence and extortion. All people yearn to return to their homes, with resources to rebuild them, a chance of living a good life on the land of their ancestors, or supporting farmers to make it productive again, knowing they are safe and protected by a world-wide acknowledgement in law, of our bodily integrity, sovereignty, resonance and equanimity with each other.
15.
There are 36 pressing animal issues, from vivisection, to farming, to a continuum of product testing, to slaughter house practices including
Halal, to save on anaesthetic, non compliance, cruelty, genetic engineering, breeding, intensive exploitation, byproducts. The introduction of animal-derived bank notes is relevant to this case as all settlements, compensation must not utilise or perpetuate animal enslavement. Gold, silver, clean un-fluoridated water ownership of the home people live in and land for organic horticulture food production. Freedom, recognition of sentience and self-determination for animals. Protection of pollinators and end the use of words like pork, beef, by- product, which remove the affinity between living organisms:
In 2020, The Bank of England faced a legal challenge over its use of animal fats in banknotes, lawyers warned after a landmark ruling on Friday.
The British five, ten, twenty and fifty pound notes are made from plastic polymer and tallow, an animal fat derived from beef, mutton, and pork.
16.
Before Aukus partnership with between UK, USA and Australia, involving the purchase of 8 nuclear submarines, breaking an agreement with France and then signing a contract with the UK and US.
Complete Nuclear Disarmament CND’s Bruce Kent, Buckey Boone, Linda Cataldo Modica and Rob Forsyth spoke at UN:
Showing the breach of Nuclear Weapons Treaties, make the case for the incongruity of calling nuclear a deterrent, and the spending of 205 billion on Trident and under-spending on National Health Service.
Bruce Kent is a British political activist and a laicised Roman Catholic priest. Active in the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), he was the organisation's general secretary from 1980 to 1985 and its chair from 1987 to 1990. He now holds the honorary title of vice-president. Bruce Kent was the first speaker to address what the Treaty For The Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, that was signed by 122 countries and ratified on the 22nd January 2021 means and what can we do to encourage the UK to sign it.
He emphasized public awareness and the power of public opinion by juxtaposing the under funding of the NHS and the huge costs of the UK’s nuclear weapons. He pointed out how many people are waiting for medical treatment and complaints about the underfunding of the NHS
are commonplace but we never see people complain about the 205 billion for the Trident replacement for example, as people just don’t know. He recommended having a simple poster or flier in the window of your house and car, to highlight the comparison with a statement “Fund the NHS. Stop Funding Nuclear Weapons”, to link them in people’s minds as a choice the government are making.
His second point was the massive risk of accident, miscalculation and the consequences of a nuclear strike. We were starkly reminded of the reality of the instruction or command to press the button to launch a nuclear missile. He told us about Stanislav Petrov, a Soviet commander general who, in 1983, received the command to send a nuclear bomb, as retaliation when Russia received faulty information that they were under nuclear attack. Petrov luckily refused but there continues to be a massive responsibility and vulnerability to catastrophic error, in information, communications and decision making.
The third point was the incongruence of calling UK nuclear weapons ‘independent’. He likened it to the claim that your car was independent transport, even when you had to borrow wheels from a neighbour to actually use it.
Buckey Boone
Appalachian Peace Education Centre (APEC) in Abingdon, Virginia.
Buckey started by telling us about the Appalachian Peace Education Centre (APEC) started in 1982 about the same time as our group, in reaction to the Nuclear Freeze Movement. (Initiatives calling for a bilateral freeze on production, deployment and testing of nuclear weapons. In 1982, nine states, 275 city governments, and 446 town hall meetings passed pro-freeze resolutions. Of the 18 million Americans who voted on the freeze policy that year, 60% voted in support of it).
Because their town is Abingdon, Virginia, they early on formed a sister relationship with us at the Abingdon Peace Group.
The group has worked since then and right up until today to eliminate nuclear weapons. However, early on, a year or two after they started, they expanded their mission to address other peace issues including
their government’s military interventions in wars as well as justice issues. They established the first environmental organization in their region. We developed a project to welcome Mexican migrants to their area. They developed the first support group for LGBTQ persons in their region and work for racial justice in the area; starting the first Martin Luther King celebration, 35 years ago. Their major focus in this last year has been on racial justice, after the murder of George Floyd. They organized a vigil and a march in Abingdon and joined with other local groups that advocate with schools, police and prosecutors, to improve their policies around equity.
They also advocated for changes in State Law, mainly in Virginia, where they had a chance. Unlike, he thought, in Tennessee where his colleague Linda was speaking from, where there are not so many opportunities. In Virginia, though, they have seen major changes in laws around racial justice and equity.
Most exciting, he felt, was the abolition of the Death Penalty in the state that is just about to happen. Over the five or so Martin Luther King celebrations, some of the events were even better attended because they were on Zoom – named as a very slight plus to the Covid restrictions.
Oakridge Environmental Peace Alliance
They have a neighbouring peace organization, the Oakridge environmental peace alliance. Oakridge is where atomic weapons were first built in World War II. OEPA has been witnessing against the building of nuclear weapons for over 20 years with weekly vigils. Three years ago, when the government restarted its manufacture of nuclear weapons and started to rebuild existing buildings in Oakridge, OEPA sued them over environmental issues and have been successful, so far, in halting construction.
The OEPA have been leaders in response to the new UN treaty: https:// orepa.org/) offering resources https://orepa.org/nuclear-ban-treaty-entry- into-force-resources/ and a national meeting to talk of next steps after ratification of the treaty on Jan 22nd https://orepa.org/a-moment-or-a- movement/ )
Linda Cataldo Modica
Linda Modica was also one of the founding members of APEC, a member of the Sierra Club and of the United Religions. She spoke at the United Nations negotiations, in New York, on anti-nuclear weapons.
She started by describing her chance to talk at the UN during negotiations on the prohibition of nuclear weapons as a privilege. She said explained how she was there to bear witness to the contamination caused by local company Nuclear Fuel Services. They have a tangible connection to our work in the UK because they are the sole provider of nuclear fuel for navy submarines, which enable nuclear missiles to be deployed, in the marine prong of the nuclear triad.
She believes she had a responsibility to work towards complete nuclear disarmament and against the destruction of the environment by Nuclear Fuel Services, who have been proven to have polluted 95 river miles downstream of their plant. Tens of thousands of people rely on that river for drinking water so they have got a lot of concern and support. This is not just local but also created a wider intent to get the United States to plan for disarmament and to abide by Article 6 of the Non Proliferation Treaty NPT. Recent actions have included a series of events for the 75th anniversary of Horishima and Nagasaki. Linda was honoured as the Hibakusha (the survivors of the blasts) made peace cranes. (The origami crane is a symbol of both peace and remembrance around the world and is closely associated with the story of the young victim of
the Hiroshima blast, Sadako Sasaki).
For the anniversary, garlands of these peace cranes were sent to elected public officials in Tennessee and Virginia, along with a letter that urged their country to disarm. They mentioned, specifically, the modernization programme for nuclear weapons which will cost about 2 trillion dollars over the next 30 years. Nuclear modernization is being planned but there is no planning yet towards disarmament – but, Linda said, they’re working on it!
Sierra Club
Linda is working with the Sierra Club as she is a long-term Sierra Club
activist and there was good news from them recently. The Sierra Club is the largest and most prestigious environmental organization with a million membership. They announced that they are going to put together a specialized expert team to work on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. This dedicated team will also work on the inividual projects that are currently being planned for new nuclear weapons, such as the 100 billion that is being planned for ICBMs. (Bulletin in chat)
One of the things she found startling was that one specialist said that many people consider American deterrents a success, pointing to the fact that no country has ever attacked the United States using nuclear weapons. She likened this to Muppets’ philosophy (as in Kermit the Frog) when Ernie tells Burt that a banana in his ear has successfully protected him from alligator attack: It relies on the same faulty logic: The absence of the alligators doesn’t prove the banana worked!
She believes that we’re seeing a fracturing of the so called logic of deterrents and it is coming to be seen as madness.
She describes all this as her ‘secular work’, however Linda sees the faith communities’ work as central too. A group she belongs to is the United Religions Initiative that has a global presence and a co-operation circle called Voices for a World Free of Nuclear Weapons.
Episcopal Bishop of the whole of California, Bishop E. Swing founded the Initiative on the request of the United Nations. So he was very well connected and Heads of State and lists of dignitaries are and have been members from the start, including Bill Perry a former defence secretary for example.
The United Religions Initiative are mobilizing those influential people from the moral standpoint, to push for disarmament, including doing a film and a vigil.
She congratulated us on the street demonstration that we had in the Town Square as a wonderful way to deliver public education and develop political will. She also recognized Ploughshares’ actions, who fund organizations that promote peace, security and work for nuclear
disarmament. https://www.plough.com/en/topics/justice/nonviolence/ blessing-the-bombs
She finished her talk with a powerful quote from the priest who blessed the bombing raids in 1945 as part of what he thought was a ‘just war’, but has dedicated the rest of his life to campaigning for non violence. Father George Zabelka said “We must all become prophets. I really mean that. We must all do something for peace. We must stop this insanity of worshiping the gods of metal. We must take a stand against evil and idolatry. This is our destiny at the most critical time of human history. But, it is also the greatest opportunity ever offered to any group of people in the history of our world to save our world from complete annihilation.“
Linda had emphasized how we must use all our networks, plus individual action and the faith communities to move our governments and create the groundswell to make it happen – make them sign the treaty.
Rob Forsyth
Rob Forsyth is a former Polaris Commander, who served in the submarine service from 1961 – 1981
including command of a nuclear-powered attack submarine and teaching the Submarine CO’s Command Course.
When introducing himself, Rob described himself to those who didn’t know him, as a bit of a ‘cuckoo in the nest’ as he had two years as second in command of a Polaris submarine including 2 periods in command. He described how he regrets it and has spent his latter years studying the very complex ‘deterrents problem’. He said he is now, firmly, not a deterrer!
Rob has a website www.whytrident.uk that explains why he has concluded that the UK should give up its nuclear deterrent.
When he set out, he found out so many facts that he didn’t know, which changed his mind that he tested them out on people. Dedington is a very blue, Conservative territory, full of very strong deterrers but many were surprised by the facts he gave them.
He recommends spreading some real information to counter the misinformation that the government puts out. As well as the website, he talks and writes articles for naval magazines.
You need to win the battle of politics. People vote with their feet and money moves feet. The one thing a politician responds to, is a loss of votes. If people think their money is being spent wrongly then they start to think otherwise about voting for a party. What you have to do is undermine people’s confidence in the message that the government is putting out.
One fact that is good to start with is that the government say all the time that the Dreadnought will cost 32 billion, for delivery some time in the 2030s. So they’ve given themselves a 10-year window and added a 10 billion contingency, so it’s actually 42 billion. There’s another 20 billion at least on the warhead and all the ancillary work that we know from Trident. So, actually, 32 billion is actually 60-70 billion. That’s the first fact people find interesting.
The second fact he poses to people as a question: Do you realize that the submarines - on patrol 7 days a week, 365 days a year, keeping you safe - have not been targeted for 25 years? There has been no nuclear threat. The missiles are at about 3 days notice to fire. This fact causes interest as nobody knows that. The information is on a government website but you have to know where to look. He continues; if they’re at 3 days’ notice to fire, why are they at sea continually? Why are they not operating like another naval ship, coming in to harbour and being deployed when there’s a crisis?
He told us how a submarine has just come off patrol having had quite a serious Covid problem on board and having to isolate people. He dreads to think how they went about that. Before they sailed, they had landed a female sailor who had Covid. You have to say, what is the aim? There is no threat, missiles are stood down, no nuclear warfare in the offing. No possibility of an instant strike – as we were told would happen, back in the Cold War, though he didn’t believe it. The submarine could easily have not gone back on patrol.
The third fact he is inclined to deliver is that we’re developing a 20 billion pound programme for a new warhead, 90% of which will be American and only 10% will be British. So we are spending billions on setting up the Admiralty Weapons Establishment (The Admiralty Surface Weapons Establishment is just the defence research agency). This also reiterated Bruce Kent’s point that UK nuclear weapons are not independent, very few of the parts are British made or owned.
Rob concludes that facts are quite a good way to undermine trust in the government and once you can start to undermine trust in the government, then perhaps they’ll start to listen to the bigger picture. And if you tell people that both Kennedy and Mountbatten, who were both big-featuring people in the nuclear world, were convinced that actually nuclear weapons were not the way to go, that is of interest too. Rob believes that had Kennedy not died, he would have embarked on a disarmament programme. Mountbatten, as well, in his last years spoke openly in the House of Lords about how we should be disarming.
Finally, he suggested we turn to the open letter that ICAN generated. 56 statesmen, from 20 NATO countries, 2 NATO Secretary Generals, all are saying Sign the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, because the NPT has been in force for 58 years and not a single disarmament measure has taken place underneath it. (The NPT is the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which entered into force in March 1970, seeking to inhibit the spread of nuclear weapons.
The NPT has become the ‘big five’s’ way of lawfully carrying on with nuclear weapons as nobody can say it doesn’t say they will get rid of them. They just have a way of not doing it. (The big five are the countries with big nuclear weapons power, including the UK) who have not yet signed the treaty.
In conclusion Rob finds that distributing simple facts like this carries quite a lot of weight.
Stop the AUKUS partnership, spending and proliferation of nuclear submarines in Asian waters.
Keep AI out of Nuclear Weapons Decisions - Report for the Indonesia
Government on AUKUS, by Frances “Unrecoverable Error”
It’s hard to remember what the public used to to be told about nuclear power. We knew nuclear reactors were dangerous because the processes of fission and fusion require extreme compression and extreme heat; temperatures twice as hot as the core of the sun. Sometimes nuclear power stations would “melt-down”, releasing radioactive waste. We were told that nuclear waste never degrades. Hundreds of millions of cubic metres, of the toxic waste, sit in each country, including Indonesia, while ways to store it ‘for longer than expected’ are explored. Sometimes nuclear waste was piped to other countries, or dumped little-by-little into the sea. More recently, the nuclear industry were in negotiations with gas and oil companies to bury the waste in empty wells. In the past, most men and women associated nuclear power with war and inevitable mass destruction, by accident or by design.
Then there was the danger of “a maniac” “pressing the button”, detonating a nuclear bomb. We hoped leaders would know of the “nuclear winter” that would follow, where nothing will grow and so much radiation in the air would make our hair fall out, and quickly humans, along with the other animal and plant life would wither and die.
People imagined that military personnel would wait nervously for the leader of their country to give the command to fire. We hoped the threat of nuclear war would only ever escalate following many months and years of peace negotiations, and efforts to find other resolutions. If we had thought about using nuclear weapons logically, we would have remembered that there is only ever a “4-minute warning”. Four minutes is not enough time to ring
the President, or even discuss with a colleague, so whoever is on duty must rely on the notification from that computer system and follow protocol. Military protocol requires immediate retaliation.
This procedure, upon which the safety of the whole world rests, was eventually tested: A transmission came in, to an Early Warning data centre, that the US had launched six nuclear missiles on Russia. By great chance, a man by the name of Stanislav Petrov was on duty. Feeling the responsibility for the action he had to take, he recognised he still had a choice. “An erroneous retaliatory nuclear attack on the United
States and its NATO allies could have wiped out half of the population”. But what else did he have, in addition to the computer reports and protocol? He had the depth of his experience; his reasoning; his observations of the political landscape; his care for life and trust in his own inner authority. Petrov made “a judgement call” and decided the reports must be a false alarm. “An investigation later confirmed that the satellite warning system had indeed malfunctioned”.
In the upcoming election debate, candidates should discuss their understanding and stance on commercial and military nuclear power and how they will lead with discernment and concern for the cost to life. The cost to life is not just if there’s a war or disaster. The replacement Trident nuclear submarine for the UK cost the same as providing an upgraded National Health Service for free, for the whole population, for 45 years. Somehow the decision to finance the submarine instead of the National Health Service, got passed in their parliament.
Thankfully, President Joko Widodo already sent a clear message to the world that “the possession and use of nuclear weapons cannot be justified for any reason”, when he ratified the Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) in November 2023. But was Indonesia informed by its “Plenipotentiary ambassadors” abroad (These are delegates to foreign countries who have independent, executive powers to act on behalf of Indonesia) about the Arkus Partnership between the UK, US and Australia; to arm Australia with eight nuclear submarines? China have called the plan “a return to a Cold War mentality”. France are calling it a “stab in the back”, as a French company was going to manufacture the submarines and Australia had to pay France 555 million euro compensation, just to get out of the deal. With that level of international bad feeling about the Arkus partnership, only formed in 2021, ministerial candidates must ask whether the submarines could make Indonesia more of a military target, than act as a ‘deterrent’ - which is what some governments are calling nuclear weapons now - or serve on the Pandemic Preparedness fast-response supply chain to international health and security crises, where the UN say they would like to maximise the use of nuclear submarines.
Following recent agreements with the US and the upcoming WHO Pandemic Treaty, already signed, can Indonesia put the brakes on and say ‘No’ to nuclear weapons in Indonesian waters or the use of Indonesian resources to fuel and arm them? The submarines, like the
other smart technologies are to use artificial intelligence extensively in their operation.
Gladiator Bangsa have also been considering, when did competent authorities, regulators and decision- makers start trusting technology and being digitally-assisted, more than trusting our own experience and knowledge and trusting each other?
Most people have sat in front of a computer screen for a lot longer than four minutes, in frustration and powerlessness, unable to even verify their own identity to access their own accounts. In the past, a computer screen would often read ‘Unrecoverable Error”. Imagine the artificial intelligence in these nuclear submarines, executing their programmed protocols without hesitation, while the Naval Commander frantically tries to get clearance to stop the ballistic missiles being fired. The computer may require a retina scan; facial recognition; a finger print, and may an OTP - a One Time Password. Picture all these being asked for at once in order to return the computer system to manual controls. Too late. “Unrecoverable error”.
References https://ccfe.ukaea.uk/uk-takes-major- step-towards-near-limitless-low-carbon-energy/ https:// healingbyfranc.blogspot.com/2021/05/ civil-nuclear-in-military- service.html https://healingbyfranc.blogspot.com/ 2015/10/they-are- trying-to-militarize- space.html https://www.icanw.org/indonesia https:// www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/ 2022/may/05/meltdown-three-mile- island- netflix-us-nuclear-accident https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/ opinion/ article/3211380/indonesia-looks-set- solidify-long-term-plans- nuclear-energy- generation https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/ iaea- delivers-final-peer-review-report-to- indonesia-on-decommissioning-and- radioactive-waste-management https://ccfe.ukaea.uk/uk-takes-major- step- towards-near-limitless-low-carbon-energy/ https://www.ucsusa.org/ resources/how- nuclear-weapons-work https://www.iaea.org/bulletin/ what-is- fusion-and-why-is-it-so-difficult-to-achieve
https://www.dailynewsegypt.com/ 2022/12/10/swiss-banker-pascal- najadi- files-criminal-charges-against-new-swiss- president-alain-berset/ https://thebulletin.org/2022/10/nowhere-to- hide-how-a-nuclear-war- would-kill-you- and-almost-everyone-else/ https:// www.eurasiareview.com/05012024- the-nuclear-energy-dilemma-
climate- savior-or-existential-threat-analysis/? fbclid=IwAR3KX- QxvKTMOCburKEg5GHdz6B4uqLxj82FU Hp7lpwLtOIVnzeFA82nkrY http://factorgmo.com/public-board/ https://ukinventory.nda.gov.uk/wp- content/ uploads/2014/01/Understanding-activities- that-produce- radioactive-wastes-in-the- UK.pdf
Conflict of Interests Nuclear PDF slides - attached.
Professor Richard Claproth, Gladiator Bangsa, The WHO and the Armed Forces, implemented by a front provided by Save The Children Fund UK.
Professor Richard Claproth Why Indonesia Should Exit the WHO
17.
Pascal Najadi: The WEF is not eligible anymore for diplomatic immunity. I call on the Swiss authorities and security to arrest those people immediately.
Pascal Najadi and Dr Astrid Stuckelberger discuss the dark underbelly of global organizations headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland.
“Everything evil in the world related to democide unfortunately comes from Geneva,” Najadi says. “You have WHO in Geneva, you have GAVI, then you have the WEF...that has diplomatic immunity.
“I, as a Swiss citizen right here, now declare that the WEF is not eligible anymore for diplomatic immunity. I call on the Swiss authorities and security to arrest those people immediately.”
“Why? The WEF, WHO, GAVI, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Bill Gates all advocated a global humanity injection by a bioweapon injecting nanolipids into 5.7 billion people. And we Swiss are hosting them. That’s terrible. We cannot tolerate any entity that promotes poison to be injected into humanity. But you have done it. I’m the victim. I’m dying from it, and my mother, too. It’s a democide and will be judged. It will be corrected in the name of humanity.”
At the beginning of this year, Pascal Najadi, a retired banker from Switzerland filed criminal charges of Abuse of Office under Article 310 of the Swiss Criminal Code against Swiss President Alain Berset, who was also that country’s former Minister of Health. To everyone’s surprise, the Attorney General of Switzerland launched an investigation into the
President – the first, of a sitting head of state over their “vaccine” policies – causing Berset to resign!
Pascal was born in Switzerland and his Swiss mother, Heidi Anderhub- Minger is the grandniece of Rudolf Minger, who was the President of Switzerland before World War II. Pascal’s father, Hussain Najadi was the renowned Persian-Bahraini international banker and business developer who became a founding member of the European Management Forum, before he broke off with Klaus Schwab in 1987 and the Davos meeting was renamed the World Economic Forum.
Pascal says his father broke off with Klaus Schwab but he says that the early European Management Forum was a small gathering of no more than 100 people that was held at a 4-star hotel that he describes as “clever” and “benign”. It was basically a schmoozefest for leaders from “emerging markets” mainly in Asia, where Hussain had founded banks to develop Middle Eastern capital. In 2013, Hussain was fatally shot in Kuala Lumpur, alongside his wife, who was seriously injured. Pascal believes his father was assassinated for reporting corruption within Malaysia.
In the meantime, the World Economic Forum was taken over by the same group that is pushing Agenda 2030 at the UN, which Pascal calls “The end of humanity.”
Last February, Pascal said of the International Health Regulations, “Exit the WHO. If you can do that, that’s the smartest thing to do. Just exit...It is a Fascist declaration.”
18) A Text Book Case of Genocide ignored.
Director of the New York Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Craig Mokhibe Resignation Letter - Peace https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24103463-craig-mokhiber- resignation-letter
HEADQUARTERS | SIEGE | NEW YORK, NY 10017 TEL.: + 212 963 5931 | craig.mokhiber@un.org 28 October 2023
Dear High Commissioner,
This will be my last official communication to you as Director of the New York Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
I write at a moment of great anguish for the world, including for many of our colleagues. Once again, we are seeing a genocide unfolding before our eyes, and the Organization that we serve appears powerless to stop it. As someone who has investigated human rights in Palestine since the 1980s, lived in Gaza as a UN human rights advisor in the 1990s, and carried out several human rights missions to the country before and since, this is deeply personal to me.
I also worked in these halls through the genocides against the Tutsis, Bosnian Muslims, the Yazidi, and the Rohingya. In each case, when the dust settled on the horrors that had been perpetrated against defenseless civilian populations, it became painfully clear that we had failed in our duty to meet the imperatives of prevention of mass atrocites, of protection of the vulnerable, and of accountability for perpetrators. And so it has been with successive waves of murder and persecution against the Palestinians throughout the entire life of the UN. High Commissioner, we are failing again.
As a human rights lawyer with more than three decades of experience in the field, I know well that the concept of genocide has often been subject to political abuse. But the current wholesale slaughter of the Palestinian people, rooted in an ethno-nationalist settler colonial ideology, in continuation of decades of their systematic persecution and purging, based entirely upon their status as Arabs, and coupled with explicit statements of intent by leaders in the Israeli government and military, leaves no room for doubt or debate. In Gaza, civilian homes, schools, churches, mosques, and medical institutions are wantonly attacked as thousands of civilians are massacred. In the West Bank, including occupied Jerusalem, homes are seized and reassigned based entirely on race, and violent settler pogroms are accompanied by Israeli military units. Across the land, Apartheid rules.
This is a text-book case of genocide. The European, ethno-nationalist, settler colonial project in Palestine has entered its final phase, toward the expedited destruction of the last remnants of indigenous Palestinian life in Palestine. What’s more, the governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, and much of Europe, are wholly complicit in the horrific
assault. Not only are these governments refusing to meet their treaty obligations “to ensure respect” for the Geneva Conventions, but they are in fact actively arming the assault, providing economic and intelligence support, and giving political and diplomatic cover for Israel’s atrocities.
Volker Turk, High Commissioner for Human Rights Palais Wilson, Geneva
Craig Mokhiber resignation letter
Contributed by ISHMAEL DARO (Democracy Now!)
Craig Mokhibe - Human Rights Lawyer continues:
In concert with this, western corporate media, increasingly captured and state-adjacent, are in open breach of Article 20 of the ICCPR, continuously dehumanizing Palestinians to facilitate the genocide, and broadcasting propaganda for war and advocacy of national, racial, or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility, and violence. US-based social media companies are suppressing the voices of human rights defenders while amplifying pro-Israel propaganda. Israel lobby online-trolls and GONGOS are harassing and smearing human rights defenders, and western universities and employers are collaborating with them to punish those who dare to speak out against the atrocities. In the wake of this genocide, there must be an accounting for these actors as well, just as there was for radio Milles Collines in Rwanda.
In such circumstances, the demands on our organization for principled and effective action are greater than ever. But we have not met the challenge. The protective enforcement power Security Council has again been blocked by US intransigence, the SG is under assault for the mildest of protestations, and our human rights mechanisms are under sustained slanderous attack by an organized, online impunity network. Decades of distraction by the illusory and largely disingenuous promises of Oslo have diverted the Organization from its core duty to defend international law, international human rights, and the Charter itself. The mantra of the “two-state solution” has become an open joke in the corridors of the UN, both for its utter impossibility in fact, and for its total failure to account for the inalienable human rights of the Palestinian
people. The so-called “Quartet” has become nothing more than a fig leaf for inaction and for subservience to a brutal status quo. The (US- scripted) deference to “agreements between the parties themselves” (in place of international law) was always a transparent slight-of-hand, designed to reinforce the power of Israel over the rights of the occupied and dispossessed Palestinians.
High Commissioner, I came to this Organization first in the 1980s, because I found in it a principled, norm- based institution that was squarely on the side of human rights, including in cases where the powerful US, UK, and Europe were not on our side. While my own government, its subsidiarity institutions, and much of the US media were still supporting or justifying South African apartheid, Israeli oppression, and Central American death squads, the UN was standing up for the oppressed peoples of those lands. We had international law on our side. We had human rights on our side. We had principle on our side. Our authority was rooted in our integrity. But no more.
In recent decades, key parts of the UN have surrendered to the power of the US, and to fear of the Israel Lobby, to abandon these principles, and to retreat from international law itself. We have lost a lot in this abandonment, not least our own global credibility. But the Palestinian people have sustained the biggest losses as a result of our failures. It is a stunning historic irony that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted in the same year that the Nakba was perpetrated against the Palestinian people. As we commemorate the 75th Anniversary of the UDHR, we would do well to abandon the old cliché that the UDHR was born out of the atrocities that proceeded it, and to admit that it was born alongside one of the most atrocious genocides of the 20th Century, that of the destruction of Palestine. In some sense, the framers were promising human rights to everyone, except the Palestinian people. And let us remember as well, that the UN itself carries the original sin of helping to facilitate the dispossession of the Palestinian people by ratifying the European settler colonial project that seized Palestinian land and turned it over to the colonists. We have much for which to atone.
But the path to atonement is clear. We have much to learn from the principled stance taken in cities around the world in recent days, as
masses of people stand up against the genocide, even at risk of beatings and arrest. Palestinians and their allies, human rights defenders of every stripe, Christian and Muslim organizations, and progressive Jewish voices saying “not in our name”, are all leading the way. All we have to do is to follow them.
UNITED NATIONS | PAGE 3
Yesterday, just a few blocks from here, New York’s Grand Central Station was completely taken over by thousands of Jewish human rights defenders standing in solidarity with the Palestinian people and demanding an end to Israeli tyranny (many risking arrest, in the process). In doing so, they stripped away in an instant the Israeli hasbara propaganda point (and old antisemitic trope) that Israel somehow represents the Jewish people. It does not. And, as such, Israel is solely responsible for its crimes. On this point, it bears repeating, in spite of Israel lobby smears to the contrary, that criticism of Israel’s human rights violations is not antisemitic, any more than criticism of Saudi violations is Islamophobic, criticism of Myanmar violations is anti- Buddhist, or criticism of Indian violations is anti-Hindu. When they seek to silence us with smears, we must raise our voice, not lower it. I trust you will agree, High Commissioner, that this is what speaking truth to power is all about. But I also find hope in those parts of the UN that have refused to compromise the Organization’s human rights principles in spite of enormous pressures to do so. Our independent special rapporteurs, commissions of enquiry, and treaty body experts, alongside most of our staff, have continued to stand up for the human rights of the Palestinian people, even as other parts of the UN (even at the highest levels) have shamefully bowed their heads to power. As the custodians of the human rights norms and standards, OHCHR has a particular duty to defend those standards. Our job, I believe, is to make our voice heard, from the Secretary- General to the newest UN recruit, and horizontally across the wider UN system, insisting that the human rights of the Palestinian people are not up for debate, negotiation, or compromise anywhere under the blue flag. What, then, would a UN- norm-based position look like? For what would we work if we were true to our rhetorical admonitions about human rights and equality for all, accountability for perpetrators, redress for victims, protection of the
vulnerable, and empowerment for rights-holders, all under the rule of law? The answer, I believe, is simple—if we have the clarity to see beyond the propagandistic smokescreens that distort the vision of justice to which we are sworn, the courage to abandon fear and deference to powerful states, and the will to truly take up the banner of human rights and peace. To be sure, this is a long-term project and a steep climb. But we must begin now or surrender to unspeakable horror. I see ten essential points:
Legitimate action: First, we in the UN must abandon the failed (and largely disingenuous) Oslo paradigm, its illusory two-state solution, its impotent and complicit Quartet, and its subjugation of international law to the dictates of presumed political expediency. Our positions must be unapologetically based on international human rights and international law.
Clarity of Vision: We must stop the pretense that this is simply a conflict over land or religion between two warring parties and admit the reality of the situation in which a disproportionately powerful state is colonizing, persecuting, and dispossessing an indigenous population on the basis of their ethnicity.
One State based on human rights: We must support the establishment of a single, democratic, secular state in all of historic Palestine, with equal rights for Christians, Muslims, and Jews, and, therefore, the dismantling of the deeply racist, settler-colonial project and an end to apartheid across the land.
Fighting Apartheid: We must redirect all UN efforts and resources to the struggle against apartheid, just as we did for South Africa in the 1970s, 80s, and early 90s.
Return and Compensation: We must reaffirm and insist on the right to return and full compensation for all Palestinians and their families currently living in the occupied territories, in Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, and in the diaspora across the globe.
Truth and Justice: We must call for a transitional justice process, making full use of decades of accumulated UN investigations, enquiries, and reports, to document the truth, and to ensure accountability for all
perpetrators, redress for all victims, and remedies for documented injustices.
Protection: We must press for the deployment of a well-resourced and strongly mandated UN protection force with a sustained mandate to protect civilians from the river to the sea.
Disarmament: We must advocate for the removal and destruction of Israel’s massive stockpiles of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, lest the conflict lead to the total destruction of the region and, possibly, beyond.
Mediation: We must recognize that the US and other western powers are in fact not credible mediators, but rather actual parties to the conflict who are complicit with Israel in the violation of Palestinian rights, and we must engage them as such.
Solidarity: We must open our doors (and the doors of the SG) wide to the legions of Palestinian, Israeli, Jewish, Muslim, and Christian human rights defenders who are standing in solidarity with the people of Palestine and their human rights and stop the unconstrained flow of Israel lobbyists to the offices of UN leaders, where they advocate for continued war, persecution, apartheid, and impunity, and smear our human rights defenders for their principled defense of Palestinian rights.
This will take years to achieve, and western powers will fight us every step of the way, so we must be steadfast. In the immediate term, we must work for an immediate ceasefire and an end to the longstanding siege on Gaza, stand up against the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, Jerusalem, and the West Bank (and elsewhere), document the genocidal assault in Gaza, help to bring massive humanitarian aid and reconstruction to the Palestinians, take care of our traumatized colleagues and their families, and fight like hell for a principled approach in the UN’s political offices.
The UN’s failure in Palestine thus far is not a reason for us to withdraw. Rather it should give us the courage to abandon the failed paradigm of the past, and fully embrace a more principled course. Let us, as
OHCHR, boldly and proudly join the anti-apartheid movement that is growing all around the world, adding our logo to the banner of equality and human rights for the Palestinian people. The world is watching. We will all be accountable for where we stood at this crucial moment in history. Let us stand on the side of justice. I thank you, High Commissioner, Volker, for hearing this final appeal from my desk. I will leave the Office in a few days for the last time, after more than three decades of service. But please do not hesitate to reach out if I can be of assistance in the future. Sincerely, Craig Mokhiber
Senate Opposition to WHO moving from advisory agency to governing body.
The Fundamental Transformation of the W.H.O.
From Health Advisor to Global Dictator
Wednesday, November 8th 2023 Capitol Visitors Briefing for Senators, Representatives and staff on what the WHO is doing to transition from an advisory agency to a governing body. Our organizations are united in an effort to educate elected officials and the public about the World Health Organization's proposed pandemic treaty and International Health Regulation amendments in order to work together to retain our national sovereignty over issues relating to health
and other matters.
SPEAKERS
• Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI)
• The Honorable Michele Bachman, Dean, Robertson School of Government, Regent University
• Reggie Littlejohn, Esq., President of Women's Rights Without Frontiers • Dr. Meryl Nass, M.D., Founder, Door to Freedom; Scientific Adviser, Children's Health Defense
• Dr. David Bell, M.D., Ph.D., Sr Scholar at Brownstone Institute; fmr medical officer and scientist at the WHO
• Dr. Kat Lindley, Co-founder, Global Health Project
• Valerie Borek, Esq., Associate Director and Lead Policy Analyst for Stand for Health Freedom
• Kristen Ullman, Esq., President, Eagle Forum
• Catherine Austin Fitts, Fmr Assistant Secretary of Housing & Urban Development, Founder, Solari, Inc.
MODERATOR
• Frank Gaffney, Founder and Executive Chairman, Center for Security
Policy
19. Estonia reject the COP28 financing, as well as IHR Amendments and Treaty
Estonian Parliament Rejects the financing of the WHO, as well as their Amendments to the International health Regulations and the International Agreement on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response
On November 22nd, 2023, eleven members of the Estonian Parliament sent a letter to the WHO Director General providing notification of Estonia’s rejection of the International Health Regulation (2005) Amendments, as well as the International Agreement on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response. They also noted they rejected changes to financing of the WHO. They note that the full Estonian Parliament did not authorize such negotiations, as required by Estonian law.
20.
Lawyer Eddie Hobbs,: the Treaty cannot be accepted in Ireland. Crotty personally took the government to court and ruled that cooperation on foreign policy could not be codified into law as it would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of the state’s external sovereignty
Crotty v. An Taoiseach was a landmark 1987 decision of the Irish Supreme Court which found that Ireland could not ratify the Single European Act unless the Irish Constitution was first changed to permit its ratification. The case, taken by Raymond Crotty formally against the Taoiseach (then Garret FitzGerald), directly led to the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland (which authorised the ratification of the Single Act) and established that significant changes to European Union treaties required an amendment to the Irish constitution before they could be ratified by Ireland. As a consequence, Ireland, uniquely in the EU, requires a plebiscite for every new, or substantive change to a, European Union Treaty.
The substantive issues in the case revolved around the interpretation of Part III of the Single European Act which codified cooperation on foreign policy matters between the governments of the then twelve member states of the European Economic Community – referred to as European
Political Cooperation – into an international agreement. The majority of the Court ruled that if the state ratified Part III, it would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of the state's external sovereignty. The dissenting judges argued that the provisions only constituted a requirement to listen and consult.
21.
Vaccine deaths and fraudulent misrepresentation
In a ruling under the UK’s code of conduct Pfizer has been found GUILTY of ‘bringing discredit to the pharmaceutical industry’ in the UK, the most serious breach there is under the UK Code of Practice rules.
A ruling by the UK’s @PMCPAUK ound pfizer had breached the UK’s regulatory code of conduct FIVE times including misleading the public about the safety and efficacy of its Covid vaccine AND unlawfully promoting an unlicensed medicine.
This comes after Pfizer was found GUILTY in November 2022 of misleading UK parents over the safety of the Covid vaccine for kids.
22.
Cases against Artificial Intelligence and Patents
Bill Gates AI technology secretly smuggled into the billions of mosquitoes engineered to carry the Wolbachia Bacteria IP Technology. The capacity is unknown but at very least can transmit data as to where the mosquitoes are, who they bite and can receive instructions too, including electrical pulse-relayed genetic modification and directions, activations, and a kill switch, all operated through the 5G network and smart infrastructure. Outside Indonesia’s control. AI also mapped the deployment of the eggs and was used to produce a risk assessment that concluded negligible risk for over 50 risks that were all guaranteed to be a high risk and guaranteed to happen.
Artificial Intelligence is a military technology, that follows a retaliatory protocol.
Following requests for due diligence, before the release of 200 million vectors carrying Wolbachia IP Technology coupled with Microsoft CNN AI ,in Indonesia, we achieved a postponement on the WHO-approved release. That same night an Indonesian maternity Hospital, in Gaza was bombed and destroyed. Then I discovered that the https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/tech-and-start-ups/
article-760280 AI-Driven Conflict.
Through the upcoming WHO's Pandemic Treaty, and Sustainability treaties, Microsoft AI will seize control of all data and exercise a heinous credit-scoring surveillance but mainly bring Bill Gates’ patents to fruition. Exclusive rights to the Computerisation of the Human Body and all energy derived from it. All the patents and licenses have to be revoked and the technologies contained and destroyed or decommissioned. Microsoft laid off their entire Ethics team, employed to ensure good practice in the implementation of artificial intelligence.. over 10,000 were sacked and not replaced.
Microsoft has offered to pay all legal costs arising for their Artificial Intelligence customers. Microsoft will protect their customers from being sued however evidenced and extensive the infringement is.
Artificial intelligence employed to generate thousands of targets, by using data gathered from people’s social media interests.
1. President Obama changed strike targets from actual terrorist targets to 'signature groups', allowing any man woman or child with sympathy for the occupied nation or having lost a friend in the violence to become a legitimate target themselves.
2. Drones were brought to Djbouti in 2010 for stirkes in the Yemen. Obama’s covert drone war in numbers: ten times more strikes than Bush 563 rather than 57 in whole Bush term.
23.
South African Cases:
a) Clause in Pfizer government contracts - some countries had to sign
it and some were able to refuse, where guarantee was required: Natural resources, reserve banks and military bases.
South African War Crimes charges: on UK, US and Israel. Charges filed by an ex-policemen in Great Britain and Childrens Health Defence Africa Lawyers.
b) Analysis of The Sex Matters Bill as Crucial For Peace by Frances sent March 2024
“Please support the Bill forbidding the social transitioning in school of children from boys to girls and girls to boys. The Bill thankfully further
demands that no child is given puberty blockers or hormonal treatment (irreversible or otherwise-promoted) or surgery to change their sex. You can support the Bill by joining the debate tomorrow. I have also sent this to the Mayor of Abingdon, a member of Mayors for Peace. This is because the sterilzing of children, by a foreign entity, however it is achieved, is a crime. (https://infertilitymovie.org/ This is how they're doing it in Africa. (The Diabolical Agenda case of sterilising a whole population with vaccines administered as ‘Tetanus’ vaccines.
Social and Genetic Engineering. Allowing the social and genetic engineering of children is part of a wider war against men and women. Many children experience mortification and shame about their bodies and question the value of who they are, as they are, when they go through puberty and beyond. That is an emotional and mental response to failures of our education and society. We would go as far as to say that they were not even failures, but a premeditated and protracted attack on humanity, deployed by foreign and novel technologies. Please explain at the debate that it is a crime to exploit this vulnerable age group by validating the self-rejection of the healthy body they are born with.
Elon Musk (AI, 5G/6G Satellite Permit)
"Teach a people to hate themselves and their history and they are defenceless against mind viruses. They can be reprogrammed with ease."
To represent peaceful men and women in your constituency please raise the context of this bill, where the rollout of MMWave and 5G towers (and Elon Musk's satellite capacity) with an artificial intelligence interface is happening, without public consultation, consent or even planning permission. We do not consent. The capacity of this wifi technology and so-called smart infrastructure is to further 'groom' the next generation for exploitation. It is a radiological weapon of mass destruction. The internet triggers a permanent adrenalin response and intentionally spreads fear and a narrative devoid of emotional intelligence and truth. Following a Freedom of Information request into the safety of the 5G infrastructure and shortwave frequency before the rollout, I received only one sentence. “WHO says it’s safe”
Microsoft's Bill Gates is implicated in an International Criminal Court Proceedings, with thousands of cases against him and his fraudulent misrepresentation as 'philanthropic’.His original business was The Institute for Population Control, which makes the vector and vaccine program adverse events premeditated harms.
The neurotoxin fluoridation also must not be allowed into the water supply in Great Britain. It is an industrial waste product and must be stopped in areas where it has already been put in drinking water, and is already poisoning people and dumbing them down, to stages 1,2, and 3 dementia. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/epa-final- witnesses-neurotoxicity-fluoride-trial/
Men and women stand above public servants, government and obviously above corporations, in Constitiutonal law and we ask you to make sure we and our bodily integrity are not undermined further.
The updated version of the WHO and UN Treaties were not shared but leaked to the public. You may not have time to read them, and they are still being amended and so remain a ‘moving target’ in terms of meaningful analysis. You will have to trust these cases for appeal that they will bring carnage if nations aquiesce, via their “silent process”. In fact, nations haven’t kept silent at all but still the threats of profitable protracted crises (Declarations of pandemics that never end), lockdowns, forced medical procedures and surveillance down to biological data collection and replication, could still be written into legally binding agreements, unless we speak up and make the UN and WHO step down.
c) This was my communication with the South African firm of lawyers who have filed charges against the UK, US and Israel governments, for War Crimes.
In retaliation, the US have put sanctions on South Africa for filing these charges. All these hostile actions can still be defused and refused but not if the WHO come into power in May.
The WHO will also put sanctions on member states if they do not comply with the agreement in terms of reporting on their surveillance of the people, and the purchase, mandating and administering of drugs.
Most people know that the reported Hammas attacks were likely a psychological operation again, using AI to generate an event that would justify the involvement of US and UK in the bombardment of Palestine. The men and women of Great Britain do not agree or consent to the actions of the Corporation of the United Kingdom on any front and intend for our children to grow up with freedom of choice and sovereignty.
The AI machine directing Israel’s bombing spree in Gaza
The Israeli army has marked tens of thousands of Gazans as suspects for assassination, using an AI targeting system with little human oversight and a permissive policy for casualties, In 2021, a book titled “The Human-Machine Team: How to Create Synergy Between Human and Artificial Intelligence That Will Revolutionize Our World” was released in English under the pen name “Brigadier General Y.S.” In it, the author — a man who we confirmed to be the current commander of the elite Israeli intelligence unit 8200 — makes the case for designing a special machine that could rapidly process massive amounts of data to generate thousands of potential “targets” for military strikes in the heat of a war. Such technology, he writes, would resolve what he described as a “human bottleneck for both locating the new targets and decision-making to approve the targets.”
From: Franc Micklem
To: admin@wvratt.co.za <admin@wvratt.co.za The Law Firm That Will Give Evidence on War Crimes.
Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2024 at 19:30:54 GMT
Subject: For Attn: Cherise. Please add the extraction of Palestine's natural resources, bioweapons, and use of AI as a retaliatory military protocol
Thank you for your time on the telephone today and for addressing the war crimes.
I am grateful for this opportunity to add
1) the use of artificial Intelligence, a military technology weaponized by its retaliation protocol.
2) the extraction of Palestine's natural gas and other resources and 3) the contravening of the Non proliferation of weapons of mass destruction treaty to the crimes and, I'm afraid,
4) Please add the United Nations to the parties committing these war crimes.
We will need four at least of the men who have made Protected Disclosures who are in custody and not at all protected, to give evidence and win their freedom.
Julian Assange was the first to reveal the UN's perpetuation of conflict. Richard Boyle who worked towards the end of Usury and could confirm malpractice in the WEF.
David McBride who blew the whistle on War Crimes in Afghanistan, confirmed by the Brereton Report.
Reiner Fuellmich who was imprisoned as he took the pharmaceutical industry and governments to court for genocide during the pandemic.
The precedent in law we have is the woman I volunteer for, previous Health Minister of Indonesia who is the only political leader we have in the world, I believe, who has been to prison for trying to avoid a biological disaster. The only person who has been able to shut down a military laboratory, on biosafety and corruption grounds. She also hid a deadly pathogen from the WHO and refused to share samples. It was gone when got out of prison. When she was finally able to track it down, it was in Ukraine, where there are reports of terrible experiments and noncompliance in American-funded military laboratories there. https://www-suarapemredkalbar-com.translate.goog/read/nasional/ 30052022/biolab-as-namru-2-yang-dilawan-siti-fadilah-menkes-yang- dipenjarakan?_x_tr_sl=id&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp This is the problem of Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) it is justified and pulbily funded on health terms but then patented for vaccine profits and the findings withheld on defence grounds. I will share a bioweapons paper, that was drafted in 2021. It talks about non-invasive gene therapy. This relates to Elon Musk's 180 day experimental permit to use his satellites for undisclosed purposes but in connection with T Mobile devices and 5 and 6G smart infrastructure and networks to collect and transmit data and degradation of human health, without any regulatory oversight.
157 of 194 UN Member states have lodged formal reservations, rejections, and some even withdrawn formally from the WHO Treaty and
the IHR Amendments. All the African states have been used for biological experiments on whole communities of children. I attach my presentation on the recent live GMO plasmodium parasite- Malaria 'vaccines' being administered to children.
Please don't overlook the biological and radiological war crimes as they are a big contender.
First notice served on WHO for Pandemic Preparedness https://healingbyfranc.blogspot.com/2023/12/questions-to-ask-before- you-sign-treaty.html
Second notice served on WHO for Retaliatory Protocol https://healingbyfranc.blogspot.com/2023/12/whos-thin-veneer-of-health- strategy.html
UN, WHO, US Military, US Philantrhopic Funding Gates and Musk, Weapons of Mass Destruction. https://healingbyfranc.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-un-both-want-and-dont- want-nuclear.html
Analysis of WHO and Military Relations https://healingbyfranc.blogspot.com/2023/12/analysis-of-who-and- military-relations.html
Assault on the Kingdom of Hawai: Scorch of Maui attributed to Musk's Space X army.
The only way to decontaminate a gene edited microbes and gene drives outside a laboratory is to scorch the land.
Attached: EPA Testimony from speaker for national security expert from Hawai Unites.
Bioweapons are Offensive and Defensive - https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/ mosquito-bio-warfare--who-desperation-grows/
This is me being interviewed by Children's Health Defense Africa https://www.freedomalliancesa.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2023/12/4_5782709465862116422.pdf
Unxploited gas reserves in Palestine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Energy_in_the_State_of_Palestine#:~:text=Palestine%20produces%20n o%20oil%20or,Corporation%20(IEC)%20for%20electricity.
United Nations double agents. Herding women and children into schools for sanctuary but then informing Israel, since 2010
An email I wrote in 2010 describing how the UN had placed Palestinian women and children in schools for sanctuary but then notified Israeli who obliterated them with two scatterbombs - weapons on trial from the US - where the shards reignited when they entered the body:
Thu February 4, 2010 at 11:13
From: fmicklem8@yahoo.co.uk
To: bmicklem@googlemail.com
The exhibition clearly showed the consequences of the attack on Gaza last year. The first half consisted of striking cell phone photos from many people in schoolyards with hundreds of phosphorous rays landing everywhere. The second half was an exhibition of drawings made by surviving children
as part of a project aimed at remedying the mental trauma suffered.
Gaza was bombed from December 27, 2008 to January 18, 2009. The UN then offered their schools as refuge to the Palestinians but the UN informed the Israelis. This made schools a target and hundreds of children and entire families were killed. Eighteen schools were fully destroyed, two hundred and fifty schools bombed.
The two types of bombs used were both developed by the United States and given to Israel for testing.
White phosphorus bombs rained down on large areas, burning whatever they landed on. New technology adding gel to the composition of the bombs meant that they
remained lit and burned people as they tried to escape. Phosphorus fallout also reignites, making the place unsafe for days. Anyway, there was nowhere to go -
the entire area is only 7 miles by 22 miles.
The second type of bomb has been described as genotoxic. Thousands of toxic metal rods break off and remain in the body undetected. They are invisible to the naked eye
cannot be removed. Their toxicity will cause cancer and cancer in the next generation.
The drawings showed more destruction. Several showed bulldozers
destroying apartments full of people. Many showed that the attack was carried out
by machines rather than soldiers. Drones were used - remotely controlled bombers, operated from the base camp. The observations written alongside these images
included a question aimed at children. “Should people be allowed to kill real people with a video game?
Some school groups were also present
at the exhibition, with one of them drawing pictures in response to the images in the exhibition. An older foreign group studied the exhibits. Some of our fellow Fas Lane
protesters had put together the exhibit with a man who had worked with Palestinian children for years, originally trying to create a soccer team and program
exchange with Great Britain. He was also there in March last year to carry out the art therapy project with the young survivors. All photos were both
beautiful and horrible. There was no hatred but a lot of blood, tears, bombs, houses destroyed and symbols of Gaza as a whole destroyed.
Since the exhibition, I have heard on the radio that a British brigadier had been reprimanded for his role in the tragedy, linked to the bombing of a UN ship.
warehouse. It was said only last week that the Israelis had finally admitted to the use of white phosphorous bombs. We fear that the
the bombings will have marked another generation of fear and hatred. From the photos it looked like fear and grief, yes, but hatred, no. Perhaps this is
something that will follow though.
Love Frances
Netanyahu described his relationship with Microsoft as a marriage made in heaven and here there is discussed the uses including biological of AI. Bear in mind, Bill Gates holds a patent for exclusive rights to generate energy by computerizing the human body. https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/tech-and-start-ups/ article-760280 "For example, researchers harnessed drug-development AI last year to generate 40,000 potentially deadly molecules, some
closely resembling VX, the most potent nerve agent ever developed.
The reason I think we can achieve world peace and a restoration of nature to its balance state of organic productivity, is because all the current leaders have to step down. If redress and compensateion to men and women is possible, then it can be in the jurisdiction of land and soil, to a sovereign bank.
Indonesia is known as the burning bridge and is earmarked for a remote battle ground between the US and Russia. US is winning on most accounts by being welcomed in with its smart cities and data-collecting surveillance control mechanism, while pretending to co-chair a working group with Indonesia. The WHO has not responded to one of the withdrawals or rejections openly yet but has shown it's anger at Russia, Iran, Palestine, Brazil , Philippines, and Africa for their reservations and questioning of the legitimacy of the IHR and Treaties by strikes and undeclared releases.
The retaliation against Indonesia after we got the mass mosquito release postponed in November 2023 https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/25/gazas-indonesian-hospital- in-ruins-after-israeli-raid-days-long- siege#:~:text=Nurses%20recall%20horror%20of%20Israeli,refused%20t o%20leave%20patients%20behind.&text=The%20Indonesian%20Hospit al%2C%20one%20of,it%20may%20never%20open%20again.
d) Congratulations of South Africa being the first African Country to host a debate about the WHO Treaty. Please do your best as the crimes against humanity are unspeakable at this stage,
24. Thailand: Doctors file a case of concealment of data rather than investigate novel regimens.
Thai Medical Experts Issue 7-Point Statement Concerning Long COVID & Vax Injuries, Point to Public Health Concealment of Data
January 17 2024
In what can be described as a medical bombshell revelation--well- respected academic medical experts in Thailand employed at the nation’s number one academic medical center and a separate respected research university -- raise the alarm about the implications of both long
COVID and COVID-19 vaccination-related injury (long VAX) via a seven- point statement. Of serious concern are the implications of the observations and data from a study pointing to disturbing observations of cardiorespiratory, neuropsychiatric, neuromuscular and pro-inflammatory conditions linked to both instances of long COVID-19 and symptoms arising from COVID-19 countermeasures (vaccines). Ominously, the statement’s authors have gone on the record that the government continues to conceal the adverse impacts of the COVID-19 vaccines. With the recently announced statement, the authors also announce a research collaboration between Chulalongkorn University and Rangsit University College of Oriental Medicine, the formation of a network to collect, collate and study patient data linked to long COVID and long Vax. The goal, to better understand the underlying unfolding medical problems, leveraging existing medical treatments, investigate novel regimens and even embrace alternative courses, such as Traditional Chinese and Traditional Thai medicine.
A highly regarded neurologist-scientist, Prof Dr Thiravat Hemachudha, director of the Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre at Chulalongkorn University, among other accomplishments establishing a World Health Organization research unit at a major Thai hospital, along with Panthep Puapongphan, dean of Rangsit University’s College of Oriental Medicine, and a psychiatrist on the Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine Dr. Atapol Sughondhabirom issued an ominous joint statement—a call to action to healthcare professionals. Their concern? The accumulation of their observations, manifestation of hidden disease, weakened immunity as potential pathway to neurological disorders and even cancer as well as shining light on nefarious efforts to conceal public health data as to the true volume of people across Thailand facing health issues linked to either long COVID or the COVID-19 vaccines.
In this case, the WHO’s own Constitution says that Amendments must be circulated at least 4 months before voting. And the 80 pages of the International Health Amendments giving “aggregious powers to force vaccinations, force medical procedures, force lockdowns and border closures and allow detention without due process”, are still being worked out, FOI 4941 revealed.
25. “Banking is slightly illegal,” says world-renowned economist Richard Werner, who is leading the charge against CBDCs. In this episode of "The Glenn Beck Podcast," Richard teaches Glenn that “banks don’t take deposits, and banks don’t lend money.” That begs the question, “What do banks actually do?” This discussion may make you realize that all you think you know about money is wrong. That’s not all we don’t know about the economy. We also have no clue which banks make up the Federal Reserve, who created Bitcoin, or the real relationship between inflation and interest rates. But we do know that COVID-19 revealed a global concentration of power and probably paved the way for the tool dictators of old could have only dreamt of: CBDC. Before the appeal of Universal Basic Income lures you into implanting a chip under your skin, it may be time to consider whether or not America should follow the China-inspired path to one central bank. Perhaps, it’s time to consider what Glenn says about the central planners of our economy: “You’re in Vegas, and the house always wins.”
No comments:
Post a Comment