Pages

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Federal Supreme Court Irish Submission

Cutting to a Good Bit in An Baunracht 


Irish evidence sent: This notice is to confirm my support for the Appeal and the reference as item 20 connected to the Raymond Crotty vs An Taoiseach Irish Supreme Court Ruling 1987. Justice Hederman ruled that the Irish Government (the Cabinet) cannot fetter parts of the Irish Constitution given unfettered to the Irish People in international treaties, that the Government was the guardian of, not the disposer of the Constitution. It is quite concise and clear.


This is a central part of the legal endowment of the Irish People. The majority ruling in favour of Crotty requires the Irish Government to go to the Irish People by way of referendum on any international treaty that would otherwise diminish the rights of the Irish People given to them under the Irish Constitution. It is the intention however of the Cabinet not to do so.
Taken together the WHO plans to give itself unilateral authority to declare early emergencies and pandemic health emergencies of international concern through its Director General and advised by its Chief Scientific Officer, without reference to members and treaty signatories.

In connection with the IHR the amendments already the term ‘non-binding’ has been replaced over 160 times with the word ‘Shall’ featuring prominently. It requires members to restrict free speech and counter science under the guise of policing the WHO definition of misinformation.
It requires nations to treat pathogens as national assets for gain of function enhancements for which vaccines can be rushed from Labs to Arms in under 100 days, with full indemnity to pharmaceutical manufacturers many of which directly or indirectly fund the WHO, this includes its biggest private funder the ‘Gates Foundation’.

The Covid Pandemic makes clear that the WHO is captive to a powerful nexus of Pharma and compromised Regulators, establishing a model that bypasses national democratic chambers and representative democracies in favour of the WHO as the centralised control, heralding an assembly line of PHEICS and ‘Vaccines’ issued under Emergency Use Authorisation and which pose an existential threat to public health and must be challenged. In particular the WHO abandoned its policy not to lockdown societies for respiratory viruses due to the greater collateral health damage created by lockdowns and, furthermore it promoted the use of PCR tests set at greatly elevated amplification that created a phantom pandemic constructed on false positive data that the WHO extended into reporting false deaths from Covid.

It further proposes to extend its remit over Animal and Plant health involving air, water and climate change, which effectively is the whole pot.

It must be stopped.

The Court can be supplied with copious proofs that support the above from eminent health scientists, doctors and lawyers, including from Irish constitutional experts

No comments:

Post a Comment